Does an aggressor's target choice matter? Assessing change in the social network prestige of aggressive youth

Naomi C Z Andrews, Laura Hanish, Carlos E. Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on a social dominance approach, aggression is conceptualized as a strategy used to gain position, power, and influence within the peer network. However, aggression may only be beneficial when targeted against particular peers; both victims' social standing and the number of victims targeted may impact aggressors' social standing. The current study examined associations between aggressors' targeting tendencies (victims' social standing and number of victims) and aggressors' own social standing, both concurrently and over time. Analyses were conducted using three analytic samples of seventh and eighth grade aggressors (Ns ranged from 161 to 383, 49% girls; 50% Latina/o). Participants nominated their friends; nominations were used to calculate social network prestige. Peer nominations were used to identify aggressors and their victim(s). For each aggressor, number of victims and victims' social network prestige were assessed. Aggressors with more victims and with highly prestigious victims had higher social network prestige themselves, and they increased more in prestige over time than aggressors with fewer victims and less prestigious victims (though there were some differences across analytic samples). Findings have implications for the need to extend the social dominance approach to better address the links between aggressors and victims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAggressive Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Social Support
Social Dominance
Aggression
Hispanic Americans
Prestige
Social Networks
Peer Influence
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Social dominance
  • Social network prestige
  • Social standing
  • Victimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Does an aggressor's target choice matter? Assessing change in the social network prestige of aggressive youth. / Andrews, Naomi C Z; Hanish, Laura; Santos, Carlos E.

In: Aggressive Behavior, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c524b9eb4964147a4877dff644ac50c,
title = "Does an aggressor's target choice matter? Assessing change in the social network prestige of aggressive youth",
abstract = "Based on a social dominance approach, aggression is conceptualized as a strategy used to gain position, power, and influence within the peer network. However, aggression may only be beneficial when targeted against particular peers; both victims' social standing and the number of victims targeted may impact aggressors' social standing. The current study examined associations between aggressors' targeting tendencies (victims' social standing and number of victims) and aggressors' own social standing, both concurrently and over time. Analyses were conducted using three analytic samples of seventh and eighth grade aggressors (Ns ranged from 161 to 383, 49{\%} girls; 50{\%} Latina/o). Participants nominated their friends; nominations were used to calculate social network prestige. Peer nominations were used to identify aggressors and their victim(s). For each aggressor, number of victims and victims' social network prestige were assessed. Aggressors with more victims and with highly prestigious victims had higher social network prestige themselves, and they increased more in prestige over time than aggressors with fewer victims and less prestigious victims (though there were some differences across analytic samples). Findings have implications for the need to extend the social dominance approach to better address the links between aggressors and victims.",
keywords = "Aggression, Social dominance, Social network prestige, Social standing, Victimization",
author = "Andrews, {Naomi C Z} and Laura Hanish and Santos, {Carlos E.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/ab.21695",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Aggressive Behavior",
issn = "0096-140X",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does an aggressor's target choice matter? Assessing change in the social network prestige of aggressive youth

AU - Andrews, Naomi C Z

AU - Hanish, Laura

AU - Santos, Carlos E.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Based on a social dominance approach, aggression is conceptualized as a strategy used to gain position, power, and influence within the peer network. However, aggression may only be beneficial when targeted against particular peers; both victims' social standing and the number of victims targeted may impact aggressors' social standing. The current study examined associations between aggressors' targeting tendencies (victims' social standing and number of victims) and aggressors' own social standing, both concurrently and over time. Analyses were conducted using three analytic samples of seventh and eighth grade aggressors (Ns ranged from 161 to 383, 49% girls; 50% Latina/o). Participants nominated their friends; nominations were used to calculate social network prestige. Peer nominations were used to identify aggressors and their victim(s). For each aggressor, number of victims and victims' social network prestige were assessed. Aggressors with more victims and with highly prestigious victims had higher social network prestige themselves, and they increased more in prestige over time than aggressors with fewer victims and less prestigious victims (though there were some differences across analytic samples). Findings have implications for the need to extend the social dominance approach to better address the links between aggressors and victims.

AB - Based on a social dominance approach, aggression is conceptualized as a strategy used to gain position, power, and influence within the peer network. However, aggression may only be beneficial when targeted against particular peers; both victims' social standing and the number of victims targeted may impact aggressors' social standing. The current study examined associations between aggressors' targeting tendencies (victims' social standing and number of victims) and aggressors' own social standing, both concurrently and over time. Analyses were conducted using three analytic samples of seventh and eighth grade aggressors (Ns ranged from 161 to 383, 49% girls; 50% Latina/o). Participants nominated their friends; nominations were used to calculate social network prestige. Peer nominations were used to identify aggressors and their victim(s). For each aggressor, number of victims and victims' social network prestige were assessed. Aggressors with more victims and with highly prestigious victims had higher social network prestige themselves, and they increased more in prestige over time than aggressors with fewer victims and less prestigious victims (though there were some differences across analytic samples). Findings have implications for the need to extend the social dominance approach to better address the links between aggressors and victims.

KW - Aggression

KW - Social dominance

KW - Social network prestige

KW - Social standing

KW - Victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009454785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009454785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ab.21695

DO - 10.1002/ab.21695

M3 - Article

C2 - 28093765

AN - SCOPUS:85009454785

JO - Aggressive Behavior

JF - Aggressive Behavior

SN - 0096-140X

ER -