Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes

Richard D. Hartley, Holly Ventura Miller, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the Sixth Amendment of the constitution guarantees assistance of counsel to indigent criminal defendants, questions exist about the quality of this representation. Critics assert that 'you get what you pay for' and that public defenders are less effective than privately retained counsel regarding criminal justice outcomes. Some research, however, reveals that public defenders are as effective as privately retained counsel because of their working relationships with prosecutors and judges, the so-called courtroom workgroup. The current study tested the assertion that 'you get what you pay for' by examining the effect of type of counsel (public defenders versus private attorneys) on four different case processing outcomes for a large mid-western jurisdiction. Results generally show that type of counsel has no significant direct effect. Tests for interaction, however, suggest that for some defendants, type of counsel interacts with other key variables to influence certain outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1063-1070
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Lawyers
amendment
jurisdiction
critic
guarantee
constitution
assistance
justice
Criminal Law
Constitution and Bylaws
Poverty
interaction
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. / Hartley, Richard D.; Miller, Holly Ventura; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 38, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 1063-1070.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hartley, Richard D. ; Miller, Holly Ventura ; Spohn, Cassia. / Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. In: Journal of Criminal Justice. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 5. pp. 1063-1070.
@article{c50203924a904f83a6927da27638debb,
title = "Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes",
abstract = "Although the Sixth Amendment of the constitution guarantees assistance of counsel to indigent criminal defendants, questions exist about the quality of this representation. Critics assert that 'you get what you pay for' and that public defenders are less effective than privately retained counsel regarding criminal justice outcomes. Some research, however, reveals that public defenders are as effective as privately retained counsel because of their working relationships with prosecutors and judges, the so-called courtroom workgroup. The current study tested the assertion that 'you get what you pay for' by examining the effect of type of counsel (public defenders versus private attorneys) on four different case processing outcomes for a large mid-western jurisdiction. Results generally show that type of counsel has no significant direct effect. Tests for interaction, however, suggest that for some defendants, type of counsel interacts with other key variables to influence certain outcomes.",
author = "Hartley, {Richard D.} and Miller, {Holly Ventura} and Cassia Spohn",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1063--1070",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes

AU - Hartley, Richard D.

AU - Miller, Holly Ventura

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Although the Sixth Amendment of the constitution guarantees assistance of counsel to indigent criminal defendants, questions exist about the quality of this representation. Critics assert that 'you get what you pay for' and that public defenders are less effective than privately retained counsel regarding criminal justice outcomes. Some research, however, reveals that public defenders are as effective as privately retained counsel because of their working relationships with prosecutors and judges, the so-called courtroom workgroup. The current study tested the assertion that 'you get what you pay for' by examining the effect of type of counsel (public defenders versus private attorneys) on four different case processing outcomes for a large mid-western jurisdiction. Results generally show that type of counsel has no significant direct effect. Tests for interaction, however, suggest that for some defendants, type of counsel interacts with other key variables to influence certain outcomes.

AB - Although the Sixth Amendment of the constitution guarantees assistance of counsel to indigent criminal defendants, questions exist about the quality of this representation. Critics assert that 'you get what you pay for' and that public defenders are less effective than privately retained counsel regarding criminal justice outcomes. Some research, however, reveals that public defenders are as effective as privately retained counsel because of their working relationships with prosecutors and judges, the so-called courtroom workgroup. The current study tested the assertion that 'you get what you pay for' by examining the effect of type of counsel (public defenders versus private attorneys) on four different case processing outcomes for a large mid-western jurisdiction. Results generally show that type of counsel has no significant direct effect. Tests for interaction, however, suggest that for some defendants, type of counsel interacts with other key variables to influence certain outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957024924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957024924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957024924

VL - 38

SP - 1063

EP - 1070

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 5

ER -