Do the ideological beliefs of peers predict the prejudiced attitudes of other individuals in the group?

V. Paul Poteat, Lisa Spanierman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors used multilevel modeling to examine whether peer group ideological beliefs (n = 109 friendship groups) predicted the homophobic and racist attitudes of other individuals within the group (n = 395 college students). Results indicated that the social dominance orientation (SDO), right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and universal-diverse orientation (UDO) ideological beliefs of peers predicted the prejudiced attitudes of other group members, over and above individuals' own ideological views. Additionally, the strength with which individuals' own ideological beliefs predicted their prejudiced attitudes varied systematically across peer groups. Affiliations with high-RWA peers strengthened the extent to which individuals' own SDO and RWA predicted their prejudiced attitudes. Results suggest the ideological beliefs of peers are relevant to predicting the prejudiced attitudes of the individuals with whom they affiliate. Although specific peer ideologies differentially predicted forms of prejudice, the overall contribution of these peer ideology beliefs to the prediction of individuals' prejudiced attitudes was comparable for both homophobic and racist attitudes. Attention to proximal social networks and the social dynamics within these networks can contribute to better explanations of individual differences in prejudiced attitudes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-514
Number of pages20
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
authoritarianism
Group
Social Dominance
Peer Group
peer group
Students
friendship group
Peers
Individuality
group membership
prejudice
Social Support
Ideologies
social network
ideology
Racist
Ideology
student
Individual Differences

Keywords

  • authoritarianism
  • homophobia
  • ideology
  • peer groups
  • prejudice
  • racism
  • social dominance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Do the ideological beliefs of peers predict the prejudiced attitudes of other individuals in the group? / Poteat, V. Paul; Spanierman, Lisa.

In: Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Vol. 13, No. 4, 07.2010, p. 495-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff6c93a68b3c4b97ac421412d11e8ed9,
title = "Do the ideological beliefs of peers predict the prejudiced attitudes of other individuals in the group?",
abstract = "The authors used multilevel modeling to examine whether peer group ideological beliefs (n = 109 friendship groups) predicted the homophobic and racist attitudes of other individuals within the group (n = 395 college students). Results indicated that the social dominance orientation (SDO), right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and universal-diverse orientation (UDO) ideological beliefs of peers predicted the prejudiced attitudes of other group members, over and above individuals' own ideological views. Additionally, the strength with which individuals' own ideological beliefs predicted their prejudiced attitudes varied systematically across peer groups. Affiliations with high-RWA peers strengthened the extent to which individuals' own SDO and RWA predicted their prejudiced attitudes. Results suggest the ideological beliefs of peers are relevant to predicting the prejudiced attitudes of the individuals with whom they affiliate. Although specific peer ideologies differentially predicted forms of prejudice, the overall contribution of these peer ideology beliefs to the prediction of individuals' prejudiced attitudes was comparable for both homophobic and racist attitudes. Attention to proximal social networks and the social dynamics within these networks can contribute to better explanations of individual differences in prejudiced attitudes.",
keywords = "authoritarianism, homophobia, ideology, peer groups, prejudice, racism, social dominance",
author = "Poteat, {V. Paul} and Lisa Spanierman",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1368430209357436",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "495--514",
journal = "Group Processes and Intergroup Relations",
issn = "1368-4302",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do the ideological beliefs of peers predict the prejudiced attitudes of other individuals in the group?

AU - Poteat, V. Paul

AU - Spanierman, Lisa

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - The authors used multilevel modeling to examine whether peer group ideological beliefs (n = 109 friendship groups) predicted the homophobic and racist attitudes of other individuals within the group (n = 395 college students). Results indicated that the social dominance orientation (SDO), right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and universal-diverse orientation (UDO) ideological beliefs of peers predicted the prejudiced attitudes of other group members, over and above individuals' own ideological views. Additionally, the strength with which individuals' own ideological beliefs predicted their prejudiced attitudes varied systematically across peer groups. Affiliations with high-RWA peers strengthened the extent to which individuals' own SDO and RWA predicted their prejudiced attitudes. Results suggest the ideological beliefs of peers are relevant to predicting the prejudiced attitudes of the individuals with whom they affiliate. Although specific peer ideologies differentially predicted forms of prejudice, the overall contribution of these peer ideology beliefs to the prediction of individuals' prejudiced attitudes was comparable for both homophobic and racist attitudes. Attention to proximal social networks and the social dynamics within these networks can contribute to better explanations of individual differences in prejudiced attitudes.

AB - The authors used multilevel modeling to examine whether peer group ideological beliefs (n = 109 friendship groups) predicted the homophobic and racist attitudes of other individuals within the group (n = 395 college students). Results indicated that the social dominance orientation (SDO), right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and universal-diverse orientation (UDO) ideological beliefs of peers predicted the prejudiced attitudes of other group members, over and above individuals' own ideological views. Additionally, the strength with which individuals' own ideological beliefs predicted their prejudiced attitudes varied systematically across peer groups. Affiliations with high-RWA peers strengthened the extent to which individuals' own SDO and RWA predicted their prejudiced attitudes. Results suggest the ideological beliefs of peers are relevant to predicting the prejudiced attitudes of the individuals with whom they affiliate. Although specific peer ideologies differentially predicted forms of prejudice, the overall contribution of these peer ideology beliefs to the prediction of individuals' prejudiced attitudes was comparable for both homophobic and racist attitudes. Attention to proximal social networks and the social dynamics within these networks can contribute to better explanations of individual differences in prejudiced attitudes.

KW - authoritarianism

KW - homophobia

KW - ideology

KW - peer groups

KW - prejudice

KW - racism

KW - social dominance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049325244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049325244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368430209357436

DO - 10.1177/1368430209357436

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78049325244

VL - 13

SP - 495

EP - 514

JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

SN - 1368-4302

IS - 4

ER -