Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City

Amy Ellen Schwartz, Leanna Stiefel, Matthew Wiswall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluate the effectiveness of small high school reform in the country's largest school district, New York City. Using a rich administrative dataset for multiple cohorts of students and distance between student residence and school to instrument for endogenous school selection, we find substantial heterogeneity in school effects: newly created small schools have positive effects on graduation and some other education outcomes while older small schools do not. Importantly, we show that ignoring this source of treatment effect heterogeneity by assuming a common small school effect yields a misleading zero effect of small school attendance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-40
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Urban Economics
Volume77
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

district
school
performance
evidence
school attendance
student
school reform
city
School performance
effect
education

Keywords

  • Education reform
  • Heterogeneous treatment
  • Instrumental variables
  • Small schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City. / Schwartz, Amy Ellen; Stiefel, Leanna; Wiswall, Matthew.

In: Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 77, 09.2013, p. 27-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwartz, Amy Ellen ; Stiefel, Leanna ; Wiswall, Matthew. / Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City. In: Journal of Urban Economics. 2013 ; Vol. 77. pp. 27-40.
@article{e0d88eff810c4b2a9fdef17481db4ece,
title = "Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City",
abstract = "We evaluate the effectiveness of small high school reform in the country's largest school district, New York City. Using a rich administrative dataset for multiple cohorts of students and distance between student residence and school to instrument for endogenous school selection, we find substantial heterogeneity in school effects: newly created small schools have positive effects on graduation and some other education outcomes while older small schools do not. Importantly, we show that ignoring this source of treatment effect heterogeneity by assuming a common small school effect yields a misleading zero effect of small school attendance.",
keywords = "Education reform, Heterogeneous treatment, Instrumental variables, Small schools",
author = "Schwartz, {Amy Ellen} and Leanna Stiefel and Matthew Wiswall",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "27--40",
journal = "Journal of Urban Economics",
issn = "0094-1190",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City

AU - Schwartz, Amy Ellen

AU - Stiefel, Leanna

AU - Wiswall, Matthew

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - We evaluate the effectiveness of small high school reform in the country's largest school district, New York City. Using a rich administrative dataset for multiple cohorts of students and distance between student residence and school to instrument for endogenous school selection, we find substantial heterogeneity in school effects: newly created small schools have positive effects on graduation and some other education outcomes while older small schools do not. Importantly, we show that ignoring this source of treatment effect heterogeneity by assuming a common small school effect yields a misleading zero effect of small school attendance.

AB - We evaluate the effectiveness of small high school reform in the country's largest school district, New York City. Using a rich administrative dataset for multiple cohorts of students and distance between student residence and school to instrument for endogenous school selection, we find substantial heterogeneity in school effects: newly created small schools have positive effects on graduation and some other education outcomes while older small schools do not. Importantly, we show that ignoring this source of treatment effect heterogeneity by assuming a common small school effect yields a misleading zero effect of small school attendance.

KW - Education reform

KW - Heterogeneous treatment

KW - Instrumental variables

KW - Small schools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877674586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877674586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877674586

VL - 77

SP - 27

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Urban Economics

JF - Journal of Urban Economics

SN - 0094-1190

ER -