Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning

Emily Talen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

157 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The planning community has shown a curious lack of interest in developing methods to evaluate how successfully plans are implemented. Evaluation in planning has centered primarily on methods of comparing the impacts of alternative proposed plans. The methodological problems with evaluating implementation success are many, but they are not insurmountable. A typology of planning evaluation is offered here. The need to establish a separate, distinctive form of planning evaluation focused exclusively on evaluating the implementation success of plans is discussed. This call to develop and refine methods to evaluate plan implementation success coin-cides with the call by many theorists to develop better theories of planning based on a keener understanding of the realities of planning practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-259
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Planning Literature
Volume10
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

planning
evaluation
planning practice
typology
plan
lack
community
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development

Cite this

Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. / Talen, Emily.

In: Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 10, No. 3, 02.1996, p. 248-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c80affa97b2e4d22bc622c7122e6db09,
title = "Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning",
abstract = "The planning community has shown a curious lack of interest in developing methods to evaluate how successfully plans are implemented. Evaluation in planning has centered primarily on methods of comparing the impacts of alternative proposed plans. The methodological problems with evaluating implementation success are many, but they are not insurmountable. A typology of planning evaluation is offered here. The need to establish a separate, distinctive form of planning evaluation focused exclusively on evaluating the implementation success of plans is discussed. This call to develop and refine methods to evaluate plan implementation success coin-cides with the call by many theorists to develop better theories of planning based on a keener understanding of the realities of planning practice.",
author = "Emily Talen",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "248--259",
journal = "Journal of Planning Literature",
issn = "0885-4122",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning

AU - Talen, Emily

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - The planning community has shown a curious lack of interest in developing methods to evaluate how successfully plans are implemented. Evaluation in planning has centered primarily on methods of comparing the impacts of alternative proposed plans. The methodological problems with evaluating implementation success are many, but they are not insurmountable. A typology of planning evaluation is offered here. The need to establish a separate, distinctive form of planning evaluation focused exclusively on evaluating the implementation success of plans is discussed. This call to develop and refine methods to evaluate plan implementation success coin-cides with the call by many theorists to develop better theories of planning based on a keener understanding of the realities of planning practice.

AB - The planning community has shown a curious lack of interest in developing methods to evaluate how successfully plans are implemented. Evaluation in planning has centered primarily on methods of comparing the impacts of alternative proposed plans. The methodological problems with evaluating implementation success are many, but they are not insurmountable. A typology of planning evaluation is offered here. The need to establish a separate, distinctive form of planning evaluation focused exclusively on evaluating the implementation success of plans is discussed. This call to develop and refine methods to evaluate plan implementation success coin-cides with the call by many theorists to develop better theories of planning based on a keener understanding of the realities of planning practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029846679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029846679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029846679

VL - 10

SP - 248

EP - 259

JO - Journal of Planning Literature

JF - Journal of Planning Literature

SN - 0885-4122

IS - 3

ER -