Do Performance-Safety Tradeoffs Cause Hypometric Metabolic Scaling in Animals?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypometric scaling of aerobic metabolism in animals has been widely attributed to constraints on oxygen (O2) supply in larger animals, but recent findings demonstrate that O2 supply balances with need regardless of size. Larger animals also do not exhibit evidence of compensation for O2 supply limitation. Because declining metabolic rates (MRs) are tightly linked to fitness, this provides significant evidence against the hypothesis that constraints on supply drive hypometric scaling. As an alternative, ATP demand might decline in larger animals because of performance-safety tradeoffs. Larger animals, which typically reproduce later, exhibit risk-reducing strategies that lower MR. Conversely, smaller animals are more strongly selected for growth and costly neurolocomotory performance, elevating metabolism. Animal size does not affect limiting O2 levels, based on physiological tests.Larger animals show no evidence of attempting to compensate for O2 supply limits.Smaller animals have more expensive neuromuscular and anabolic systems.Larger animals have characteristics that reduce risk and energy use.Declining mass-specific ATP demand might cause hypometric scaling of MR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

safety
animal
animals
animal characteristics
metabolism
supply balance
animal performance
energy use
oxygen
fitness
energy
testing
rate

Keywords

  • Allometry
  • Body size
  • Metabolic rate
  • Scaling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

@article{2923af00c2284e54988f6e723f1ebaea,
title = "Do Performance-Safety Tradeoffs Cause Hypometric Metabolic Scaling in Animals?",
abstract = "Hypometric scaling of aerobic metabolism in animals has been widely attributed to constraints on oxygen (O2) supply in larger animals, but recent findings demonstrate that O2 supply balances with need regardless of size. Larger animals also do not exhibit evidence of compensation for O2 supply limitation. Because declining metabolic rates (MRs) are tightly linked to fitness, this provides significant evidence against the hypothesis that constraints on supply drive hypometric scaling. As an alternative, ATP demand might decline in larger animals because of performance-safety tradeoffs. Larger animals, which typically reproduce later, exhibit risk-reducing strategies that lower MR. Conversely, smaller animals are more strongly selected for growth and costly neurolocomotory performance, elevating metabolism. Animal size does not affect limiting O2 levels, based on physiological tests.Larger animals show no evidence of attempting to compensate for O2 supply limits.Smaller animals have more expensive neuromuscular and anabolic systems.Larger animals have characteristics that reduce risk and energy use.Declining mass-specific ATP demand might cause hypometric scaling of MR.",
keywords = "Allometry, Body size, Metabolic rate, Scaling",
author = "Jon Harrison",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2017.05.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Performance-Safety Tradeoffs Cause Hypometric Metabolic Scaling in Animals?

AU - Harrison, Jon

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Hypometric scaling of aerobic metabolism in animals has been widely attributed to constraints on oxygen (O2) supply in larger animals, but recent findings demonstrate that O2 supply balances with need regardless of size. Larger animals also do not exhibit evidence of compensation for O2 supply limitation. Because declining metabolic rates (MRs) are tightly linked to fitness, this provides significant evidence against the hypothesis that constraints on supply drive hypometric scaling. As an alternative, ATP demand might decline in larger animals because of performance-safety tradeoffs. Larger animals, which typically reproduce later, exhibit risk-reducing strategies that lower MR. Conversely, smaller animals are more strongly selected for growth and costly neurolocomotory performance, elevating metabolism. Animal size does not affect limiting O2 levels, based on physiological tests.Larger animals show no evidence of attempting to compensate for O2 supply limits.Smaller animals have more expensive neuromuscular and anabolic systems.Larger animals have characteristics that reduce risk and energy use.Declining mass-specific ATP demand might cause hypometric scaling of MR.

AB - Hypometric scaling of aerobic metabolism in animals has been widely attributed to constraints on oxygen (O2) supply in larger animals, but recent findings demonstrate that O2 supply balances with need regardless of size. Larger animals also do not exhibit evidence of compensation for O2 supply limitation. Because declining metabolic rates (MRs) are tightly linked to fitness, this provides significant evidence against the hypothesis that constraints on supply drive hypometric scaling. As an alternative, ATP demand might decline in larger animals because of performance-safety tradeoffs. Larger animals, which typically reproduce later, exhibit risk-reducing strategies that lower MR. Conversely, smaller animals are more strongly selected for growth and costly neurolocomotory performance, elevating metabolism. Animal size does not affect limiting O2 levels, based on physiological tests.Larger animals show no evidence of attempting to compensate for O2 supply limits.Smaller animals have more expensive neuromuscular and anabolic systems.Larger animals have characteristics that reduce risk and energy use.Declining mass-specific ATP demand might cause hypometric scaling of MR.

KW - Allometry

KW - Body size

KW - Metabolic rate

KW - Scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026319008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026319008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2017.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2017.05.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 28760361

AN - SCOPUS:85026319008

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

ER -