Do People Agree about the Causes of Behavior? A Social Relations Analysis of Behavior Ratings and Causal Attributions

Richard W. Robins, Joanie B. Connell, Gerald A. Mendelsohn, Sau Kwan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examined consistency and agreement in behavior ratings and causal attributions. In Study 1, participants (N = 280) engaged in a series of getting-acquainted conversations in one of 3 communication media (face-to-face, telephone, computer mediated); in Study 2, participants (N = 120) engaged in a competitive group task. In both studies, participants rated themselves and their interaction partner(s) on a set of behaviors and then made attributions about the causes of those behaviors. The major findings were that (a) participants consistently favored some causal factors over others in explaining both their own and their partners' behavior, supporting the existence of generalized attributional styles; and (b) participants showed moderate self-partner and partner-partner agreement about behavior but virtually no agreement about the causes of behavior. Thus, in brief interactions people tend to see themselves and others through the lens of their stable patterns of perceiving and interpreting behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-344
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Communications Media
Telephone
Social Relations
Lenses
attribution
rating
cause
communication media
interaction
telephone
conversation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Do People Agree about the Causes of Behavior? A Social Relations Analysis of Behavior Ratings and Causal Attributions. / Robins, Richard W.; Connell, Joanie B.; Mendelsohn, Gerald A.; Kwan, Sau.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 334-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82251c4a62894ac594474d1dab21cf48,
title = "Do People Agree about the Causes of Behavior? A Social Relations Analysis of Behavior Ratings and Causal Attributions",
abstract = "Two studies examined consistency and agreement in behavior ratings and causal attributions. In Study 1, participants (N = 280) engaged in a series of getting-acquainted conversations in one of 3 communication media (face-to-face, telephone, computer mediated); in Study 2, participants (N = 120) engaged in a competitive group task. In both studies, participants rated themselves and their interaction partner(s) on a set of behaviors and then made attributions about the causes of those behaviors. The major findings were that (a) participants consistently favored some causal factors over others in explaining both their own and their partners' behavior, supporting the existence of generalized attributional styles; and (b) participants showed moderate self-partner and partner-partner agreement about behavior but virtually no agreement about the causes of behavior. Thus, in brief interactions people tend to see themselves and others through the lens of their stable patterns of perceiving and interpreting behavior.",
author = "Robins, {Richard W.} and Connell, {Joanie B.} and Mendelsohn, {Gerald A.} and Sau Kwan",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.334",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "334--344",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do People Agree about the Causes of Behavior? A Social Relations Analysis of Behavior Ratings and Causal Attributions

AU - Robins, Richard W.

AU - Connell, Joanie B.

AU - Mendelsohn, Gerald A.

AU - Kwan, Sau

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Two studies examined consistency and agreement in behavior ratings and causal attributions. In Study 1, participants (N = 280) engaged in a series of getting-acquainted conversations in one of 3 communication media (face-to-face, telephone, computer mediated); in Study 2, participants (N = 120) engaged in a competitive group task. In both studies, participants rated themselves and their interaction partner(s) on a set of behaviors and then made attributions about the causes of those behaviors. The major findings were that (a) participants consistently favored some causal factors over others in explaining both their own and their partners' behavior, supporting the existence of generalized attributional styles; and (b) participants showed moderate self-partner and partner-partner agreement about behavior but virtually no agreement about the causes of behavior. Thus, in brief interactions people tend to see themselves and others through the lens of their stable patterns of perceiving and interpreting behavior.

AB - Two studies examined consistency and agreement in behavior ratings and causal attributions. In Study 1, participants (N = 280) engaged in a series of getting-acquainted conversations in one of 3 communication media (face-to-face, telephone, computer mediated); in Study 2, participants (N = 120) engaged in a competitive group task. In both studies, participants rated themselves and their interaction partner(s) on a set of behaviors and then made attributions about the causes of those behaviors. The major findings were that (a) participants consistently favored some causal factors over others in explaining both their own and their partners' behavior, supporting the existence of generalized attributional styles; and (b) participants showed moderate self-partner and partner-partner agreement about behavior but virtually no agreement about the causes of behavior. Thus, in brief interactions people tend to see themselves and others through the lens of their stable patterns of perceiving and interpreting behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342303763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1342303763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.334

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.334

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 334

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -