Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation

Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J. Kenney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

222 Scopus citations

Abstract

Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is "yes." We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens become more likely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)877-889
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume93
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this