Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation

Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J. Kenney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

213 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is "yes." We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens become more likely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)877-889
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume93
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1999

Fingerprint

campaign
participation
politics
senate
voting
criticism
election
citizen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. / Kahn, Kim Fridkin; Kenney, Patrick J.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 93, No. 4, 12.1999, p. 877-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb5a7f66c387490eb5a93d4dedebfd2d,
title = "Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation",
abstract = "Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is {"}yes.{"} We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens become more likely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.",
author = "Kahn, {Kim Fridkin} and Kenney, {Patrick J.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "877--889",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation

AU - Kahn, Kim Fridkin

AU - Kenney, Patrick J.

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is "yes." We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens become more likely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.

AB - Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is "yes." We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens become more likely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033475213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033475213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033475213

VL - 93

SP - 877

EP - 889

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 4

ER -