Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a mediation model to explain the relationship between CEO humility and firm performance. Building on upper echelons, power, and paradox theories, we hypothesize that when a more humble CEO leads a firm, its top management team (TMT) is more likely to collaborate, share information, jointly make decisions, and possess a shared vision. The firm will also tend to have lower pay disparity between the CEO and the TMT. The humble CEO and TMT, in turn, will be more likely to adopt an ambidextrous strategic orientation, which will be associated with stronger firm performance. We tested the model by using both survey and archival data that were collected at multiple time points from 105 small-to-medium-sized firms in the computer software and hardware industry in the United States. Findings largely support our theoretical assertions, suggesting that CEO humility has important implications for firm processes and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1147-1173
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Management
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Chief executive officer
Top management teams
Firm performance
Upper echelons
Information share
Low pay
Mediation
Paradox
Industry
Shared vision
Strategic orientation

Keywords

  • CEO humility
  • firm performance
  • organizational ambidexterity
  • pay disparity
  • top management team integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes. / Ou, Amy Y.; Waldman, David; Peterson, Suzanne.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 1147-1173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78c0d2c387e44ee7a10b5f54921f99f9,
title = "Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes",
abstract = "We propose a mediation model to explain the relationship between CEO humility and firm performance. Building on upper echelons, power, and paradox theories, we hypothesize that when a more humble CEO leads a firm, its top management team (TMT) is more likely to collaborate, share information, jointly make decisions, and possess a shared vision. The firm will also tend to have lower pay disparity between the CEO and the TMT. The humble CEO and TMT, in turn, will be more likely to adopt an ambidextrous strategic orientation, which will be associated with stronger firm performance. We tested the model by using both survey and archival data that were collected at multiple time points from 105 small-to-medium-sized firms in the computer software and hardware industry in the United States. Findings largely support our theoretical assertions, suggesting that CEO humility has important implications for firm processes and outcomes.",
keywords = "CEO humility, firm performance, organizational ambidexterity, pay disparity, top management team integration",
author = "Ou, {Amy Y.} and David Waldman and Suzanne Peterson",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206315604187",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1147--1173",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes

AU - Ou, Amy Y.

AU - Waldman, David

AU - Peterson, Suzanne

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - We propose a mediation model to explain the relationship between CEO humility and firm performance. Building on upper echelons, power, and paradox theories, we hypothesize that when a more humble CEO leads a firm, its top management team (TMT) is more likely to collaborate, share information, jointly make decisions, and possess a shared vision. The firm will also tend to have lower pay disparity between the CEO and the TMT. The humble CEO and TMT, in turn, will be more likely to adopt an ambidextrous strategic orientation, which will be associated with stronger firm performance. We tested the model by using both survey and archival data that were collected at multiple time points from 105 small-to-medium-sized firms in the computer software and hardware industry in the United States. Findings largely support our theoretical assertions, suggesting that CEO humility has important implications for firm processes and outcomes.

AB - We propose a mediation model to explain the relationship between CEO humility and firm performance. Building on upper echelons, power, and paradox theories, we hypothesize that when a more humble CEO leads a firm, its top management team (TMT) is more likely to collaborate, share information, jointly make decisions, and possess a shared vision. The firm will also tend to have lower pay disparity between the CEO and the TMT. The humble CEO and TMT, in turn, will be more likely to adopt an ambidextrous strategic orientation, which will be associated with stronger firm performance. We tested the model by using both survey and archival data that were collected at multiple time points from 105 small-to-medium-sized firms in the computer software and hardware industry in the United States. Findings largely support our theoretical assertions, suggesting that CEO humility has important implications for firm processes and outcomes.

KW - CEO humility

KW - firm performance

KW - organizational ambidexterity

KW - pay disparity

KW - top management team integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041280572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041280572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206315604187

DO - 10.1177/0149206315604187

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041280572

VL - 44

SP - 1147

EP - 1173

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 3

ER -