Diversity in American biology, 1900-1940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper argues both that the decentralized and democratic context in the United States prior to World War II encouraged the development of diverse approaches, programs, and institutional supports for the biological sciences, and that the resulting pluralism is consistent with the complex and messy ways that science is used in a democratic society. This is not a claim that only U.S. science experiences such diversity, nor that the way science plays out in our American form of modified constitutional democracy, are unique. Rather, my intention is to underline the particular character of the diversity and its implications for science and to begin further discussion of this phenomenon. I challenge others to pursue comparative analysis for other places and times, so that we can begin to explore more deeply what meaning this diversity--or the lack thereof--holds for science more generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-52
Number of pages18
JournalHistory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Volume21
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Second World War
Pluralism
Comparative Analysis
Democracy
Intentions
Biological Sciences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Diversity in American biology, 1900-1940. / Maienschein, Jane.

In: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1999, p. 35-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cba959e708a148b3978eb0a64ab02791,
title = "Diversity in American biology, 1900-1940.",
abstract = "This paper argues both that the decentralized and democratic context in the United States prior to World War II encouraged the development of diverse approaches, programs, and institutional supports for the biological sciences, and that the resulting pluralism is consistent with the complex and messy ways that science is used in a democratic society. This is not a claim that only U.S. science experiences such diversity, nor that the way science plays out in our American form of modified constitutional democracy, are unique. Rather, my intention is to underline the particular character of the diversity and its implications for science and to begin further discussion of this phenomenon. I challenge others to pursue comparative analysis for other places and times, so that we can begin to explore more deeply what meaning this diversity--or the lack thereof--holds for science more generally.",
author = "Jane Maienschein",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "35--52",
journal = "History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences",
issn = "0391-9714",
publisher = "Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity in American biology, 1900-1940.

AU - Maienschein, Jane

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This paper argues both that the decentralized and democratic context in the United States prior to World War II encouraged the development of diverse approaches, programs, and institutional supports for the biological sciences, and that the resulting pluralism is consistent with the complex and messy ways that science is used in a democratic society. This is not a claim that only U.S. science experiences such diversity, nor that the way science plays out in our American form of modified constitutional democracy, are unique. Rather, my intention is to underline the particular character of the diversity and its implications for science and to begin further discussion of this phenomenon. I challenge others to pursue comparative analysis for other places and times, so that we can begin to explore more deeply what meaning this diversity--or the lack thereof--holds for science more generally.

AB - This paper argues both that the decentralized and democratic context in the United States prior to World War II encouraged the development of diverse approaches, programs, and institutional supports for the biological sciences, and that the resulting pluralism is consistent with the complex and messy ways that science is used in a democratic society. This is not a claim that only U.S. science experiences such diversity, nor that the way science plays out in our American form of modified constitutional democracy, are unique. Rather, my intention is to underline the particular character of the diversity and its implications for science and to begin further discussion of this phenomenon. I challenge others to pursue comparative analysis for other places and times, so that we can begin to explore more deeply what meaning this diversity--or the lack thereof--holds for science more generally.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033291679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033291679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 35

EP - 52

JO - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

JF - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

SN - 0391-9714

IS - 1

ER -