Divergent Perspectives on Water Security: Bridging the Policy Debate

Patricia Gober, Graham E. Strickert, Douglas A. Clark, Kwok P. Chun, Diana Payton, Kristin Bruce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmental policy discussion is replete with references to water security, food security, ecosystem health, community resilience, sustainable development, and sustainable urbanism. These terms are, by their very nature, ambiguous and difficult to define; they allow room, however, for a variety of actors to conceptualize water, food, ecological, economic, and urban problems in ways that allow them to move forward on contentious issues. This article focuses on the idea of water security and asks how it is conceptualized and used for regional policy debate in western Canada. We asked fifty-eight water stakeholders from the Saskatchewan River Basin to define water security, identify major barriers to security, and prioritize water problems. Responses showed there are myriad ways to think about water security, ranging from narrow conceptualizations, such as reliability, quality, and quantity, to broader sustainability perspectives about the nature of resource development and its social and economic consequences. The human dimensions of water security (governance, land use, and competing demands) were assigned higher priority than its biophysical aspects (flooding, droughts, and climate change). Framing water security to emphasize the human capacity to manage uncertain and rapid biophysical and societal change offers the opportunity to unite actors who otherwise would be separated by core environmental values, definitions of water security, provincial context (Alberta vs. Saskatchewan), and occupation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-71
Number of pages10
JournalProfessional Geographer
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

water
policy
food
environmental values
ecosystem health
ecological economics
regional policy
resource development
food security
drought
environmental policy
resilience
occupation
economics
sustainable development
stakeholder
climate change
land use
flooding
river basin

Keywords

  • decision context
  • New Ecological Paradigm
  • sustainable development
  • water security

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Gober, P., Strickert, G. E., Clark, D. A., Chun, K. P., Payton, D., & Bruce, K. (2015). Divergent Perspectives on Water Security: Bridging the Policy Debate. Professional Geographer, 67(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.883960

Divergent Perspectives on Water Security : Bridging the Policy Debate. / Gober, Patricia; Strickert, Graham E.; Clark, Douglas A.; Chun, Kwok P.; Payton, Diana; Bruce, Kristin.

In: Professional Geographer, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 62-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gober, P, Strickert, GE, Clark, DA, Chun, KP, Payton, D & Bruce, K 2015, 'Divergent Perspectives on Water Security: Bridging the Policy Debate', Professional Geographer, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.883960
Gober, Patricia ; Strickert, Graham E. ; Clark, Douglas A. ; Chun, Kwok P. ; Payton, Diana ; Bruce, Kristin. / Divergent Perspectives on Water Security : Bridging the Policy Debate. In: Professional Geographer. 2015 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 62-71.
@article{37d42e5c21484dc49b4e133c91481272,
title = "Divergent Perspectives on Water Security: Bridging the Policy Debate",
abstract = "Environmental policy discussion is replete with references to water security, food security, ecosystem health, community resilience, sustainable development, and sustainable urbanism. These terms are, by their very nature, ambiguous and difficult to define; they allow room, however, for a variety of actors to conceptualize water, food, ecological, economic, and urban problems in ways that allow them to move forward on contentious issues. This article focuses on the idea of water security and asks how it is conceptualized and used for regional policy debate in western Canada. We asked fifty-eight water stakeholders from the Saskatchewan River Basin to define water security, identify major barriers to security, and prioritize water problems. Responses showed there are myriad ways to think about water security, ranging from narrow conceptualizations, such as reliability, quality, and quantity, to broader sustainability perspectives about the nature of resource development and its social and economic consequences. The human dimensions of water security (governance, land use, and competing demands) were assigned higher priority than its biophysical aspects (flooding, droughts, and climate change). Framing water security to emphasize the human capacity to manage uncertain and rapid biophysical and societal change offers the opportunity to unite actors who otherwise would be separated by core environmental values, definitions of water security, provincial context (Alberta vs. Saskatchewan), and occupation.",
keywords = "decision context, New Ecological Paradigm, sustainable development, water security",
author = "Patricia Gober and Strickert, {Graham E.} and Clark, {Douglas A.} and Chun, {Kwok P.} and Diana Payton and Kristin Bruce",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00330124.2014.883960",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "62--71",
journal = "Professional Geographer",
issn = "0033-0124",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divergent Perspectives on Water Security

T2 - Bridging the Policy Debate

AU - Gober, Patricia

AU - Strickert, Graham E.

AU - Clark, Douglas A.

AU - Chun, Kwok P.

AU - Payton, Diana

AU - Bruce, Kristin

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Environmental policy discussion is replete with references to water security, food security, ecosystem health, community resilience, sustainable development, and sustainable urbanism. These terms are, by their very nature, ambiguous and difficult to define; they allow room, however, for a variety of actors to conceptualize water, food, ecological, economic, and urban problems in ways that allow them to move forward on contentious issues. This article focuses on the idea of water security and asks how it is conceptualized and used for regional policy debate in western Canada. We asked fifty-eight water stakeholders from the Saskatchewan River Basin to define water security, identify major barriers to security, and prioritize water problems. Responses showed there are myriad ways to think about water security, ranging from narrow conceptualizations, such as reliability, quality, and quantity, to broader sustainability perspectives about the nature of resource development and its social and economic consequences. The human dimensions of water security (governance, land use, and competing demands) were assigned higher priority than its biophysical aspects (flooding, droughts, and climate change). Framing water security to emphasize the human capacity to manage uncertain and rapid biophysical and societal change offers the opportunity to unite actors who otherwise would be separated by core environmental values, definitions of water security, provincial context (Alberta vs. Saskatchewan), and occupation.

AB - Environmental policy discussion is replete with references to water security, food security, ecosystem health, community resilience, sustainable development, and sustainable urbanism. These terms are, by their very nature, ambiguous and difficult to define; they allow room, however, for a variety of actors to conceptualize water, food, ecological, economic, and urban problems in ways that allow them to move forward on contentious issues. This article focuses on the idea of water security and asks how it is conceptualized and used for regional policy debate in western Canada. We asked fifty-eight water stakeholders from the Saskatchewan River Basin to define water security, identify major barriers to security, and prioritize water problems. Responses showed there are myriad ways to think about water security, ranging from narrow conceptualizations, such as reliability, quality, and quantity, to broader sustainability perspectives about the nature of resource development and its social and economic consequences. The human dimensions of water security (governance, land use, and competing demands) were assigned higher priority than its biophysical aspects (flooding, droughts, and climate change). Framing water security to emphasize the human capacity to manage uncertain and rapid biophysical and societal change offers the opportunity to unite actors who otherwise would be separated by core environmental values, definitions of water security, provincial context (Alberta vs. Saskatchewan), and occupation.

KW - decision context

KW - New Ecological Paradigm

KW - sustainable development

KW - water security

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920729427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920729427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00330124.2014.883960

DO - 10.1080/00330124.2014.883960

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84920729427

VL - 67

SP - 62

EP - 71

JO - Professional Geographer

JF - Professional Geographer

SN - 0033-0124

IS - 1

ER -