Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas

a systematic review

Cody Telep, David Weisburd, Charlotte E. Gill, Zoe Vitter, Doron Teichman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review examining the extent to which there is crime displacement or a diffusion of crime control benefits in social control interventions implemented in medium sized or large geographic areas.

Methods: A number of search strategies were used to identify and code eligible experimental or quasi-experimental studies that measured displacement in areas larger than crime hot spots. A total of 33 publications covering 43 quasi-experimental studies were identified as eligible. Nineteen of these publications covering 20 studies were included in a meta-analysis.

Results: The narrative results overall suggest that displacement is not a common occurrence in interventions implemented at larger units of geography and a diffusion of crime control benefits is somewhat more likely to occur. The effect sizes from the meta-analyses suggest that, while the interventions, on average, were associated with a significant decline in crime, displacement was not likely to occur. The meta-analyses found no significant overall evidence of displacement or a diffusion of benefits.

Conclusions: These findings are in line with previous reviews that have focused on displacement at smaller geographic units. When examining larger geographic scales and a broader array of interventions, spatial displacement is still a fairly unlikely occurrence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)515-548
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 9 2014

Fingerprint

offense
social control
geography
narrative
evidence

Keywords

  • Diffusion of benefits
  • Displacement
  • Large areas
  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas : a systematic review. / Telep, Cody; Weisburd, David; Gill, Charlotte E.; Vitter, Zoe; Teichman, Doron.

In: Journal of Experimental Criminology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 09.12.2014, p. 515-548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Telep, Cody ; Weisburd, David ; Gill, Charlotte E. ; Vitter, Zoe ; Teichman, Doron. / Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas : a systematic review. In: Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 515-548.
@article{28cc1993a8df4f6588339d0aabe5f360,
title = "Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas: a systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives: To conduct a systematic review examining the extent to which there is crime displacement or a diffusion of crime control benefits in social control interventions implemented in medium sized or large geographic areas.Methods: A number of search strategies were used to identify and code eligible experimental or quasi-experimental studies that measured displacement in areas larger than crime hot spots. A total of 33 publications covering 43 quasi-experimental studies were identified as eligible. Nineteen of these publications covering 20 studies were included in a meta-analysis.Results: The narrative results overall suggest that displacement is not a common occurrence in interventions implemented at larger units of geography and a diffusion of crime control benefits is somewhat more likely to occur. The effect sizes from the meta-analyses suggest that, while the interventions, on average, were associated with a significant decline in crime, displacement was not likely to occur. The meta-analyses found no significant overall evidence of displacement or a diffusion of benefits.Conclusions: These findings are in line with previous reviews that have focused on displacement at smaller geographic units. When examining larger geographic scales and a broader array of interventions, spatial displacement is still a fairly unlikely occurrence.",
keywords = "Diffusion of benefits, Displacement, Large areas, Meta-analysis, Systematic review",
author = "Cody Telep and David Weisburd and Gill, {Charlotte E.} and Zoe Vitter and Doron Teichman",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11292-014-9208-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "515--548",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Criminology",
issn = "1573-3750",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Displacement of crime and diffusion of crime control benefits in large-scale geographic areas

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Telep, Cody

AU - Weisburd, David

AU - Gill, Charlotte E.

AU - Vitter, Zoe

AU - Teichman, Doron

PY - 2014/12/9

Y1 - 2014/12/9

N2 - Objectives: To conduct a systematic review examining the extent to which there is crime displacement or a diffusion of crime control benefits in social control interventions implemented in medium sized or large geographic areas.Methods: A number of search strategies were used to identify and code eligible experimental or quasi-experimental studies that measured displacement in areas larger than crime hot spots. A total of 33 publications covering 43 quasi-experimental studies were identified as eligible. Nineteen of these publications covering 20 studies were included in a meta-analysis.Results: The narrative results overall suggest that displacement is not a common occurrence in interventions implemented at larger units of geography and a diffusion of crime control benefits is somewhat more likely to occur. The effect sizes from the meta-analyses suggest that, while the interventions, on average, were associated with a significant decline in crime, displacement was not likely to occur. The meta-analyses found no significant overall evidence of displacement or a diffusion of benefits.Conclusions: These findings are in line with previous reviews that have focused on displacement at smaller geographic units. When examining larger geographic scales and a broader array of interventions, spatial displacement is still a fairly unlikely occurrence.

AB - Objectives: To conduct a systematic review examining the extent to which there is crime displacement or a diffusion of crime control benefits in social control interventions implemented in medium sized or large geographic areas.Methods: A number of search strategies were used to identify and code eligible experimental or quasi-experimental studies that measured displacement in areas larger than crime hot spots. A total of 33 publications covering 43 quasi-experimental studies were identified as eligible. Nineteen of these publications covering 20 studies were included in a meta-analysis.Results: The narrative results overall suggest that displacement is not a common occurrence in interventions implemented at larger units of geography and a diffusion of crime control benefits is somewhat more likely to occur. The effect sizes from the meta-analyses suggest that, while the interventions, on average, were associated with a significant decline in crime, displacement was not likely to occur. The meta-analyses found no significant overall evidence of displacement or a diffusion of benefits.Conclusions: These findings are in line with previous reviews that have focused on displacement at smaller geographic units. When examining larger geographic scales and a broader array of interventions, spatial displacement is still a fairly unlikely occurrence.

KW - Diffusion of benefits

KW - Displacement

KW - Large areas

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916884238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916884238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11292-014-9208-5

DO - 10.1007/s11292-014-9208-5

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 515

EP - 548

JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology

JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology

SN - 1573-3750

IS - 4

ER -