Disentangling Self-Control from Its Elements: A Bifactor Analysis

Jeffrey T. Ward, Matt R. Nobles, Kathleen Talbot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Disentangle self-control from its elements and provide several new insights into the self-control dimensionality debate including: the proportion explained variance in scale items attributed to self-control and its elements, the viability of using total and individual scores to measure self-control and its elements in observed variable analyses, and the unique effects of general (self-control) and specific (elements) latent factors on crime and victimization. Methods: The current study utilizes bifactor measurement and structural equation models to address the research objectives. The sample consists of Florida jail inmates and self-control and its elements are measured with the Grasmick et al. scale. Results: Results indicate the elements exist above and beyond the general factor of self-control, and that these specific factors collectively account for nearly one-third of the total proportion explained variance in the scale items. Findings from omega reliability analyses provide evidence supporting the use of a total score to measure self-control, but discouraging the use of subscales to measure the individual elements, when measurement error is not taken into account. Results from a bifactor structural equation model predicting crime and victimization reveal that the effects of three latent specific factors (temper, risk-seeking, and self-centeredness) are substantially larger than the effects of the general factor (self-control). Conclusions: Bifactor methods placed self-control and the elements on equal conceptual footing and found both to explain variation in Grasmick et al. item responses and both to influence crime and victimization. Future work should examine the origins and stability of self-control vis-à-vis the individual elements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-627
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
self-control
Crime
Structural Models
victimization
offense
structural model
Research

Keywords

  • Bifactor
  • Dimensionality
  • Elements of self-control
  • Gottfredson and Hirschi
  • Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Self-control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Disentangling Self-Control from Its Elements : A Bifactor Analysis. / Ward, Jeffrey T.; Nobles, Matt R.; Talbot, Kathleen.

In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 595-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ward, Jeffrey T. ; Nobles, Matt R. ; Talbot, Kathleen. / Disentangling Self-Control from Its Elements : A Bifactor Analysis. In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 595-627.
@article{7851c5637b6d4a58bc6c6d8df2d6c1f6,
title = "Disentangling Self-Control from Its Elements: A Bifactor Analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: Disentangle self-control from its elements and provide several new insights into the self-control dimensionality debate including: the proportion explained variance in scale items attributed to self-control and its elements, the viability of using total and individual scores to measure self-control and its elements in observed variable analyses, and the unique effects of general (self-control) and specific (elements) latent factors on crime and victimization. Methods: The current study utilizes bifactor measurement and structural equation models to address the research objectives. The sample consists of Florida jail inmates and self-control and its elements are measured with the Grasmick et al. scale. Results: Results indicate the elements exist above and beyond the general factor of self-control, and that these specific factors collectively account for nearly one-third of the total proportion explained variance in the scale items. Findings from omega reliability analyses provide evidence supporting the use of a total score to measure self-control, but discouraging the use of subscales to measure the individual elements, when measurement error is not taken into account. Results from a bifactor structural equation model predicting crime and victimization reveal that the effects of three latent specific factors (temper, risk-seeking, and self-centeredness) are substantially larger than the effects of the general factor (self-control). Conclusions: Bifactor methods placed self-control and the elements on equal conceptual footing and found both to explain variation in Grasmick et al. item responses and both to influence crime and victimization. Future work should examine the origins and stability of self-control vis-{\`a}-vis the individual elements.",
keywords = "Bifactor, Dimensionality, Elements of self-control, Gottfredson and Hirschi, Measurement, Psychometrics, Self-control",
author = "Ward, {Jeffrey T.} and Nobles, {Matt R.} and Kathleen Talbot",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10940-014-9241-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "595--627",
journal = "Journal of Quantitative Criminology",
issn = "0748-4518",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling Self-Control from Its Elements

T2 - A Bifactor Analysis

AU - Ward, Jeffrey T.

AU - Nobles, Matt R.

AU - Talbot, Kathleen

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Objectives: Disentangle self-control from its elements and provide several new insights into the self-control dimensionality debate including: the proportion explained variance in scale items attributed to self-control and its elements, the viability of using total and individual scores to measure self-control and its elements in observed variable analyses, and the unique effects of general (self-control) and specific (elements) latent factors on crime and victimization. Methods: The current study utilizes bifactor measurement and structural equation models to address the research objectives. The sample consists of Florida jail inmates and self-control and its elements are measured with the Grasmick et al. scale. Results: Results indicate the elements exist above and beyond the general factor of self-control, and that these specific factors collectively account for nearly one-third of the total proportion explained variance in the scale items. Findings from omega reliability analyses provide evidence supporting the use of a total score to measure self-control, but discouraging the use of subscales to measure the individual elements, when measurement error is not taken into account. Results from a bifactor structural equation model predicting crime and victimization reveal that the effects of three latent specific factors (temper, risk-seeking, and self-centeredness) are substantially larger than the effects of the general factor (self-control). Conclusions: Bifactor methods placed self-control and the elements on equal conceptual footing and found both to explain variation in Grasmick et al. item responses and both to influence crime and victimization. Future work should examine the origins and stability of self-control vis-à-vis the individual elements.

AB - Objectives: Disentangle self-control from its elements and provide several new insights into the self-control dimensionality debate including: the proportion explained variance in scale items attributed to self-control and its elements, the viability of using total and individual scores to measure self-control and its elements in observed variable analyses, and the unique effects of general (self-control) and specific (elements) latent factors on crime and victimization. Methods: The current study utilizes bifactor measurement and structural equation models to address the research objectives. The sample consists of Florida jail inmates and self-control and its elements are measured with the Grasmick et al. scale. Results: Results indicate the elements exist above and beyond the general factor of self-control, and that these specific factors collectively account for nearly one-third of the total proportion explained variance in the scale items. Findings from omega reliability analyses provide evidence supporting the use of a total score to measure self-control, but discouraging the use of subscales to measure the individual elements, when measurement error is not taken into account. Results from a bifactor structural equation model predicting crime and victimization reveal that the effects of three latent specific factors (temper, risk-seeking, and self-centeredness) are substantially larger than the effects of the general factor (self-control). Conclusions: Bifactor methods placed self-control and the elements on equal conceptual footing and found both to explain variation in Grasmick et al. item responses and both to influence crime and victimization. Future work should examine the origins and stability of self-control vis-à-vis the individual elements.

KW - Bifactor

KW - Dimensionality

KW - Elements of self-control

KW - Gottfredson and Hirschi

KW - Measurement

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Self-control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947029000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947029000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10940-014-9241-6

DO - 10.1007/s10940-014-9241-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947029000

VL - 31

SP - 595

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

JF - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

SN - 0748-4518

IS - 4

ER -