Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity

Sandra A. Ham, Jared P. Reis, Scott J. Strath, Katrina D. Dubose, Barbara Ainsworth

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Current methods for validating physical activity (PA) questionnaires typically use accelerometers as objective measures for comparison with questionnaire responses and obtain low correlations or agreement. PURPOSE: We examined possible reasons for weak associations in validation studies by comparing published ActiGraph accelerometer intensity cut points with cut points based on intensity thresholds for heart rate response to PA. METHODS: Twelve adults (five men, seven women; age 31.0 ± 14.3 yr) wore an ActiGraph accelerometer and a Polar Vantage NV heart watch simultaneously for seven consecutive days during their waking hours. We identified PA bouts from the minute-by-minute ActiGraph data using published accelerometer thresholds for defining moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA. We then compared PA bout intensities identified with these criteria with intensity classifications of the PA bouts using mean percent heart rate reserve (HRR). RESULTS: Most of the moderate-intensity PA bouts identified by the Freedson (78.3%), Swartz (88.0%), and Hendelman (94.7%) ActiGraph cut points were associated with a mean %HRR < 45% (very light and light intensities). The estimated mean frequency with which study participants engaged in moderate-intensity PA varied with the cut points and type of bouts used and ranged from 1.1 d·wk (45-60%HRR) to 7.0 d·wk (Hendelman cut points). The mean total duration on active days ranged from 17.9 min·d (45-60%HRR) to 139.2 min·d (Hendelman cut points). Fewer bouts of vigorous PA were found in the accelerometer data, and most were in the vigorous-intensity category of ≥ 60%HRR. CONCLUSIONS: The method used for analyzing ActiGraph activity data can result in large differences in the summary measure of minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)52-58
    Number of pages7
    JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
    Volume39
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2007

    Fingerprint

    Exercise
    Heart Rate
    Light
    Validation Studies

    Keywords

    • Accelerometers
    • Exercise
    • Heart rate
    • Measurement
    • Validation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Cite this

    Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity. / Ham, Sandra A.; Reis, Jared P.; Strath, Scott J.; Dubose, Katrina D.; Ainsworth, Barbara.

    In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 52-58.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ham, Sandra A. ; Reis, Jared P. ; Strath, Scott J. ; Dubose, Katrina D. ; Ainsworth, Barbara. / Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2007 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 52-58.
    @article{f2bed2268e54418e8d2f774a076c5660,
    title = "Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity",
    abstract = "Current methods for validating physical activity (PA) questionnaires typically use accelerometers as objective measures for comparison with questionnaire responses and obtain low correlations or agreement. PURPOSE: We examined possible reasons for weak associations in validation studies by comparing published ActiGraph accelerometer intensity cut points with cut points based on intensity thresholds for heart rate response to PA. METHODS: Twelve adults (five men, seven women; age 31.0 ± 14.3 yr) wore an ActiGraph accelerometer and a Polar Vantage NV heart watch simultaneously for seven consecutive days during their waking hours. We identified PA bouts from the minute-by-minute ActiGraph data using published accelerometer thresholds for defining moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA. We then compared PA bout intensities identified with these criteria with intensity classifications of the PA bouts using mean percent heart rate reserve (HRR). RESULTS: Most of the moderate-intensity PA bouts identified by the Freedson (78.3{\%}), Swartz (88.0{\%}), and Hendelman (94.7{\%}) ActiGraph cut points were associated with a mean {\%}HRR < 45{\%} (very light and light intensities). The estimated mean frequency with which study participants engaged in moderate-intensity PA varied with the cut points and type of bouts used and ranged from 1.1 d·wk (45-60{\%}HRR) to 7.0 d·wk (Hendelman cut points). The mean total duration on active days ranged from 17.9 min·d (45-60{\%}HRR) to 139.2 min·d (Hendelman cut points). Fewer bouts of vigorous PA were found in the accelerometer data, and most were in the vigorous-intensity category of ≥ 60{\%}HRR. CONCLUSIONS: The method used for analyzing ActiGraph activity data can result in large differences in the summary measure of minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity.",
    keywords = "Accelerometers, Exercise, Heart rate, Measurement, Validation",
    author = "Ham, {Sandra A.} and Reis, {Jared P.} and Strath, {Scott J.} and Dubose, {Katrina D.} and Barbara Ainsworth",
    year = "2007",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1249/01.mss.0000235886.17229.42",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "52--58",
    journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
    issn = "0195-9131",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity

    AU - Ham, Sandra A.

    AU - Reis, Jared P.

    AU - Strath, Scott J.

    AU - Dubose, Katrina D.

    AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

    PY - 2007/1

    Y1 - 2007/1

    N2 - Current methods for validating physical activity (PA) questionnaires typically use accelerometers as objective measures for comparison with questionnaire responses and obtain low correlations or agreement. PURPOSE: We examined possible reasons for weak associations in validation studies by comparing published ActiGraph accelerometer intensity cut points with cut points based on intensity thresholds for heart rate response to PA. METHODS: Twelve adults (five men, seven women; age 31.0 ± 14.3 yr) wore an ActiGraph accelerometer and a Polar Vantage NV heart watch simultaneously for seven consecutive days during their waking hours. We identified PA bouts from the minute-by-minute ActiGraph data using published accelerometer thresholds for defining moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA. We then compared PA bout intensities identified with these criteria with intensity classifications of the PA bouts using mean percent heart rate reserve (HRR). RESULTS: Most of the moderate-intensity PA bouts identified by the Freedson (78.3%), Swartz (88.0%), and Hendelman (94.7%) ActiGraph cut points were associated with a mean %HRR < 45% (very light and light intensities). The estimated mean frequency with which study participants engaged in moderate-intensity PA varied with the cut points and type of bouts used and ranged from 1.1 d·wk (45-60%HRR) to 7.0 d·wk (Hendelman cut points). The mean total duration on active days ranged from 17.9 min·d (45-60%HRR) to 139.2 min·d (Hendelman cut points). Fewer bouts of vigorous PA were found in the accelerometer data, and most were in the vigorous-intensity category of ≥ 60%HRR. CONCLUSIONS: The method used for analyzing ActiGraph activity data can result in large differences in the summary measure of minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity.

    AB - Current methods for validating physical activity (PA) questionnaires typically use accelerometers as objective measures for comparison with questionnaire responses and obtain low correlations or agreement. PURPOSE: We examined possible reasons for weak associations in validation studies by comparing published ActiGraph accelerometer intensity cut points with cut points based on intensity thresholds for heart rate response to PA. METHODS: Twelve adults (five men, seven women; age 31.0 ± 14.3 yr) wore an ActiGraph accelerometer and a Polar Vantage NV heart watch simultaneously for seven consecutive days during their waking hours. We identified PA bouts from the minute-by-minute ActiGraph data using published accelerometer thresholds for defining moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA. We then compared PA bout intensities identified with these criteria with intensity classifications of the PA bouts using mean percent heart rate reserve (HRR). RESULTS: Most of the moderate-intensity PA bouts identified by the Freedson (78.3%), Swartz (88.0%), and Hendelman (94.7%) ActiGraph cut points were associated with a mean %HRR < 45% (very light and light intensities). The estimated mean frequency with which study participants engaged in moderate-intensity PA varied with the cut points and type of bouts used and ranged from 1.1 d·wk (45-60%HRR) to 7.0 d·wk (Hendelman cut points). The mean total duration on active days ranged from 17.9 min·d (45-60%HRR) to 139.2 min·d (Hendelman cut points). Fewer bouts of vigorous PA were found in the accelerometer data, and most were in the vigorous-intensity category of ≥ 60%HRR. CONCLUSIONS: The method used for analyzing ActiGraph activity data can result in large differences in the summary measure of minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity.

    KW - Accelerometers

    KW - Exercise

    KW - Heart rate

    KW - Measurement

    KW - Validation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846237597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846237597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1249/01.mss.0000235886.17229.42

    DO - 10.1249/01.mss.0000235886.17229.42

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 17218884

    AN - SCOPUS:33846237597

    VL - 39

    SP - 52

    EP - 58

    JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

    JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

    SN - 0195-9131

    IS - 1

    ER -