Disciplined to access the general education curriculum: Girls of color, disabilities, and specialized education programming

Mildred Boveda, Ganiva Reyes, Brittany Aronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

As three teacher educators with familial ties to the Global South, but academically trained within the Global North, we adopt a de/colonial, intersectional feminist lens to analyze the “general education curriculum” in the United States. We use testimonios, each told in first-person, as entry points where we situate the entanglement of gendered, classed, linguistic, and racialized experiences with disabilities and the US academy. With an understanding that disability is not to be confused with special education identification, we examine the experiences of women and girls of Color with mental disabilities across institutions and educational spaces. The narratives move from lived experiences with bipolar disorder, to pedagogical practices employed within the US school context, to discussions about disabilities in teacher preparation programs. We offer these stories as collaborative sense-making of the general education curriculum and the westernized (i.e. colonial/white supremacist/ableist/patriarchal) ontoepistemology it reinforces. Transcending curricular approaches that are tolerant of disabilities and othered sociocultural identities, we propose an intersectional, de/colonial orientation that is humanizing along the axes of dis/ability, race, socioeconomic status (SES), class, language origin, ethnicity, religion, gender expression, sexuality, nationality, and citizenship. Such an orientation favours relationality and community over isolation and individualism, and de-centers normative curriculum in special education and specialized programming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-425
Number of pages21
JournalCurriculum Inquiry
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 8 2019

Fingerprint

education curriculum
general education
programming
disability
special education
education
mental disability
experience
teacher
individualism
nationality
academy
social isolation
social status
sexuality
citizenship
ethnicity
Religion
educator
linguistics

Keywords

  • curriculum studies
  • disabilities
  • gender issues in education
  • Multicultural/diversity education
  • multiple education environments
  • teacher education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Disciplined to access the general education curriculum : Girls of color, disabilities, and specialized education programming. / Boveda, Mildred; Reyes, Ganiva; Aronson, Brittany.

In: Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 49, No. 4, 08.08.2019, p. 405-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2d24a3b22294fbf804efb969616c742,
title = "Disciplined to access the general education curriculum: Girls of color, disabilities, and specialized education programming",
abstract = "As three teacher educators with familial ties to the Global South, but academically trained within the Global North, we adopt a de/colonial, intersectional feminist lens to analyze the “general education curriculum” in the United States. We use testimonios, each told in first-person, as entry points where we situate the entanglement of gendered, classed, linguistic, and racialized experiences with disabilities and the US academy. With an understanding that disability is not to be confused with special education identification, we examine the experiences of women and girls of Color with mental disabilities across institutions and educational spaces. The narratives move from lived experiences with bipolar disorder, to pedagogical practices employed within the US school context, to discussions about disabilities in teacher preparation programs. We offer these stories as collaborative sense-making of the general education curriculum and the westernized (i.e. colonial/white supremacist/ableist/patriarchal) ontoepistemology it reinforces. Transcending curricular approaches that are tolerant of disabilities and othered sociocultural identities, we propose an intersectional, de/colonial orientation that is humanizing along the axes of dis/ability, race, socioeconomic status (SES), class, language origin, ethnicity, religion, gender expression, sexuality, nationality, and citizenship. Such an orientation favours relationality and community over isolation and individualism, and de-centers normative curriculum in special education and specialized programming.",
keywords = "curriculum studies, disabilities, gender issues in education, Multicultural/diversity education, multiple education environments, teacher education",
author = "Mildred Boveda and Ganiva Reyes and Brittany Aronson",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/03626784.2019.1652543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "405--425",
journal = "Curriculum Inquiry",
issn = "0362-6784",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disciplined to access the general education curriculum

T2 - Girls of color, disabilities, and specialized education programming

AU - Boveda, Mildred

AU - Reyes, Ganiva

AU - Aronson, Brittany

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - As three teacher educators with familial ties to the Global South, but academically trained within the Global North, we adopt a de/colonial, intersectional feminist lens to analyze the “general education curriculum” in the United States. We use testimonios, each told in first-person, as entry points where we situate the entanglement of gendered, classed, linguistic, and racialized experiences with disabilities and the US academy. With an understanding that disability is not to be confused with special education identification, we examine the experiences of women and girls of Color with mental disabilities across institutions and educational spaces. The narratives move from lived experiences with bipolar disorder, to pedagogical practices employed within the US school context, to discussions about disabilities in teacher preparation programs. We offer these stories as collaborative sense-making of the general education curriculum and the westernized (i.e. colonial/white supremacist/ableist/patriarchal) ontoepistemology it reinforces. Transcending curricular approaches that are tolerant of disabilities and othered sociocultural identities, we propose an intersectional, de/colonial orientation that is humanizing along the axes of dis/ability, race, socioeconomic status (SES), class, language origin, ethnicity, religion, gender expression, sexuality, nationality, and citizenship. Such an orientation favours relationality and community over isolation and individualism, and de-centers normative curriculum in special education and specialized programming.

AB - As three teacher educators with familial ties to the Global South, but academically trained within the Global North, we adopt a de/colonial, intersectional feminist lens to analyze the “general education curriculum” in the United States. We use testimonios, each told in first-person, as entry points where we situate the entanglement of gendered, classed, linguistic, and racialized experiences with disabilities and the US academy. With an understanding that disability is not to be confused with special education identification, we examine the experiences of women and girls of Color with mental disabilities across institutions and educational spaces. The narratives move from lived experiences with bipolar disorder, to pedagogical practices employed within the US school context, to discussions about disabilities in teacher preparation programs. We offer these stories as collaborative sense-making of the general education curriculum and the westernized (i.e. colonial/white supremacist/ableist/patriarchal) ontoepistemology it reinforces. Transcending curricular approaches that are tolerant of disabilities and othered sociocultural identities, we propose an intersectional, de/colonial orientation that is humanizing along the axes of dis/ability, race, socioeconomic status (SES), class, language origin, ethnicity, religion, gender expression, sexuality, nationality, and citizenship. Such an orientation favours relationality and community over isolation and individualism, and de-centers normative curriculum in special education and specialized programming.

KW - curriculum studies

KW - disabilities

KW - gender issues in education

KW - Multicultural/diversity education

KW - multiple education environments

KW - teacher education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073515001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073515001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03626784.2019.1652543

DO - 10.1080/03626784.2019.1652543

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073515001

VL - 49

SP - 405

EP - 425

JO - Curriculum Inquiry

JF - Curriculum Inquiry

SN - 0362-6784

IS - 4

ER -