Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Scholars and practitioners alike are interested in board effectiveness yet we know relatively little about directors' engagement and involvement in the boardroom. We integrate identity theory research from organizational behavior with literature on board monitoring and resource provision to model how directors' multiple role identities can affect their behavior. We propose directors' multiple role identities and the strength of identification with each role affects the extent to which they engage in monitoring and resource provision. Specifically we propose directors' strength of identification with the organization, director and shareholder roles has a positive relationship with both board monitoring and resource provision. Directors' identification with his/her CEO role, however, is positively related to resource provision yet negatively related to monitoring. Further, director identification with the stakeholder role has a positive relationship with monitoring but an inverted-U relationship to resource provision. We discuss implications of these individual and combined effects for corporate governance research and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAcademy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006
StatePublished - 2006
Event66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006 - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: Aug 11 2006Aug 16 2006

Other

Other66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period8/11/068/16/06

Fingerprint

Monitoring
Shareholders
Multiple roles
Resources
Organizational behaviour
Board effectiveness
Inverted-U
Chief executive officer
Stakeholders
Identity theory
Corporate governance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Hillman, A., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2006). Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. In Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006

Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. / Hillman, Amy; Nicholson, Gavin; Shropshire, Christine.

Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006. 2006.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Hillman, A, Nicholson, G & Shropshire, C 2006, Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. in Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006. 66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006, Atlanta, GA, United States, 8/11/06.
Hillman A, Nicholson G, Shropshire C. Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. In Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006. 2006
Hillman, Amy ; Nicholson, Gavin ; Shropshire, Christine. / Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006. 2006.
@inproceedings{c28346fa14e5459d9e30f40d0020a45c,
title = "Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision",
abstract = "Scholars and practitioners alike are interested in board effectiveness yet we know relatively little about directors' engagement and involvement in the boardroom. We integrate identity theory research from organizational behavior with literature on board monitoring and resource provision to model how directors' multiple role identities can affect their behavior. We propose directors' multiple role identities and the strength of identification with each role affects the extent to which they engage in monitoring and resource provision. Specifically we propose directors' strength of identification with the organization, director and shareholder roles has a positive relationship with both board monitoring and resource provision. Directors' identification with his/her CEO role, however, is positively related to resource provision yet negatively related to monitoring. Further, director identification with the stakeholder role has a positive relationship with monitoring but an inverted-U relationship to resource provision. We discuss implications of these individual and combined effects for corporate governance research and practice.",
author = "Amy Hillman and Gavin Nicholson and Christine Shropshire",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Directors' multiple role identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision

AU - Hillman, Amy

AU - Nicholson, Gavin

AU - Shropshire, Christine

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Scholars and practitioners alike are interested in board effectiveness yet we know relatively little about directors' engagement and involvement in the boardroom. We integrate identity theory research from organizational behavior with literature on board monitoring and resource provision to model how directors' multiple role identities can affect their behavior. We propose directors' multiple role identities and the strength of identification with each role affects the extent to which they engage in monitoring and resource provision. Specifically we propose directors' strength of identification with the organization, director and shareholder roles has a positive relationship with both board monitoring and resource provision. Directors' identification with his/her CEO role, however, is positively related to resource provision yet negatively related to monitoring. Further, director identification with the stakeholder role has a positive relationship with monitoring but an inverted-U relationship to resource provision. We discuss implications of these individual and combined effects for corporate governance research and practice.

AB - Scholars and practitioners alike are interested in board effectiveness yet we know relatively little about directors' engagement and involvement in the boardroom. We integrate identity theory research from organizational behavior with literature on board monitoring and resource provision to model how directors' multiple role identities can affect their behavior. We propose directors' multiple role identities and the strength of identification with each role affects the extent to which they engage in monitoring and resource provision. Specifically we propose directors' strength of identification with the organization, director and shareholder roles has a positive relationship with both board monitoring and resource provision. Directors' identification with his/her CEO role, however, is positively related to resource provision yet negatively related to monitoring. Further, director identification with the stakeholder role has a positive relationship with monitoring but an inverted-U relationship to resource provision. We discuss implications of these individual and combined effects for corporate governance research and practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858650500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858650500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84858650500

BT - Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006

ER -