Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults

Nicola Cellini, Matthew Buman, Elizabeth A. Mcdevitt, Ashley A. Ricker, Sara C. Mednick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The last 20 yrs have seen a marked increase in studies utilizing actigraphy in free-living environments. The aim of the present study is to directly compare two commercially available actigraph devices with concurrent polysomnography (PSG) during a daytime nap in healthy young adults. Thirty healthy young adults, ages 18-31 (mean 20.77 yrs, SD 3.14 yrs) simultaneously wore AW-64 and GT3X+ devices during a polysomnographically recorded nap. Mann-Whitney U (M-U) test, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman statistic were used to compare total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency (SE) between the two actigraphs and PSG. Epoch-by-epoch (EBE) agreement was calculated to determine accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values for sleep (PVS) and wake (PVW), and kappa and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients. All frequency settings provided by the devices were examined. For both actigraphs, EBE analysis found accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PVS, and PVW comparable to previous reports of other similar devices. Kappa and PABAK coefficients showed moderate to high agreement with PSG depending on device settings. The GT3X+ overestimated TST and SE, and underestimated SOL and WASO, whereas no significant difference was found between AW-64 and PSG. However, GT3X+ showed overall better EBE agreements to PSG than AW-64. We conclude that both actigraphs are valid and reliable devices for detecting sleep/wake diurnal patterns. The choice between devices should be based on several parameters as reliability, cost of the device, scoring algorithm, target population, experimental condition, and aims of the study (e.g., sleep and/or physical activity).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-698
Number of pages8
JournalChronobiology International
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Actigraphy
Young Adult
Sleep
Equipment and Supplies
Polysomnography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Health Services Needs and Demand
Nonparametric Statistics

Keywords

  • Actigraphy
  • Bland-Altman
  • Nap
  • Polysomnography
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults. / Cellini, Nicola; Buman, Matthew; Mcdevitt, Elizabeth A.; Ricker, Ashley A.; Mednick, Sara C.

In: Chronobiology International, Vol. 30, No. 5, 06.2013, p. 691-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cellini, Nicola ; Buman, Matthew ; Mcdevitt, Elizabeth A. ; Ricker, Ashley A. ; Mednick, Sara C. / Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults. In: Chronobiology International. 2013 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 691-698.
@article{8570d1ef812a480da7b162b7d0fbde27,
title = "Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults",
abstract = "The last 20 yrs have seen a marked increase in studies utilizing actigraphy in free-living environments. The aim of the present study is to directly compare two commercially available actigraph devices with concurrent polysomnography (PSG) during a daytime nap in healthy young adults. Thirty healthy young adults, ages 18-31 (mean 20.77 yrs, SD 3.14 yrs) simultaneously wore AW-64 and GT3X+ devices during a polysomnographically recorded nap. Mann-Whitney U (M-U) test, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman statistic were used to compare total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency (SE) between the two actigraphs and PSG. Epoch-by-epoch (EBE) agreement was calculated to determine accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values for sleep (PVS) and wake (PVW), and kappa and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients. All frequency settings provided by the devices were examined. For both actigraphs, EBE analysis found accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PVS, and PVW comparable to previous reports of other similar devices. Kappa and PABAK coefficients showed moderate to high agreement with PSG depending on device settings. The GT3X+ overestimated TST and SE, and underestimated SOL and WASO, whereas no significant difference was found between AW-64 and PSG. However, GT3X+ showed overall better EBE agreements to PSG than AW-64. We conclude that both actigraphs are valid and reliable devices for detecting sleep/wake diurnal patterns. The choice between devices should be based on several parameters as reliability, cost of the device, scoring algorithm, target population, experimental condition, and aims of the study (e.g., sleep and/or physical activity).",
keywords = "Actigraphy, Bland-Altman, Nap, Polysomnography, Validation",
author = "Nicola Cellini and Matthew Buman and Mcdevitt, {Elizabeth A.} and Ricker, {Ashley A.} and Mednick, {Sara C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3109/07420528.2013.782312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "691--698",
journal = "Annual Review of Chronopharmacology",
issn = "0743-9539",
publisher = "Marcel Dekker Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults

AU - Cellini, Nicola

AU - Buman, Matthew

AU - Mcdevitt, Elizabeth A.

AU - Ricker, Ashley A.

AU - Mednick, Sara C.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - The last 20 yrs have seen a marked increase in studies utilizing actigraphy in free-living environments. The aim of the present study is to directly compare two commercially available actigraph devices with concurrent polysomnography (PSG) during a daytime nap in healthy young adults. Thirty healthy young adults, ages 18-31 (mean 20.77 yrs, SD 3.14 yrs) simultaneously wore AW-64 and GT3X+ devices during a polysomnographically recorded nap. Mann-Whitney U (M-U) test, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman statistic were used to compare total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency (SE) between the two actigraphs and PSG. Epoch-by-epoch (EBE) agreement was calculated to determine accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values for sleep (PVS) and wake (PVW), and kappa and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients. All frequency settings provided by the devices were examined. For both actigraphs, EBE analysis found accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PVS, and PVW comparable to previous reports of other similar devices. Kappa and PABAK coefficients showed moderate to high agreement with PSG depending on device settings. The GT3X+ overestimated TST and SE, and underestimated SOL and WASO, whereas no significant difference was found between AW-64 and PSG. However, GT3X+ showed overall better EBE agreements to PSG than AW-64. We conclude that both actigraphs are valid and reliable devices for detecting sleep/wake diurnal patterns. The choice between devices should be based on several parameters as reliability, cost of the device, scoring algorithm, target population, experimental condition, and aims of the study (e.g., sleep and/or physical activity).

AB - The last 20 yrs have seen a marked increase in studies utilizing actigraphy in free-living environments. The aim of the present study is to directly compare two commercially available actigraph devices with concurrent polysomnography (PSG) during a daytime nap in healthy young adults. Thirty healthy young adults, ages 18-31 (mean 20.77 yrs, SD 3.14 yrs) simultaneously wore AW-64 and GT3X+ devices during a polysomnographically recorded nap. Mann-Whitney U (M-U) test, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman statistic were used to compare total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency (SE) between the two actigraphs and PSG. Epoch-by-epoch (EBE) agreement was calculated to determine accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values for sleep (PVS) and wake (PVW), and kappa and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients. All frequency settings provided by the devices were examined. For both actigraphs, EBE analysis found accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PVS, and PVW comparable to previous reports of other similar devices. Kappa and PABAK coefficients showed moderate to high agreement with PSG depending on device settings. The GT3X+ overestimated TST and SE, and underestimated SOL and WASO, whereas no significant difference was found between AW-64 and PSG. However, GT3X+ showed overall better EBE agreements to PSG than AW-64. We conclude that both actigraphs are valid and reliable devices for detecting sleep/wake diurnal patterns. The choice between devices should be based on several parameters as reliability, cost of the device, scoring algorithm, target population, experimental condition, and aims of the study (e.g., sleep and/or physical activity).

KW - Actigraphy

KW - Bland-Altman

KW - Nap

KW - Polysomnography

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879363026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879363026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/07420528.2013.782312

DO - 10.3109/07420528.2013.782312

M3 - Article

C2 - 23721120

AN - SCOPUS:84879363026

VL - 30

SP - 691

EP - 698

JO - Annual Review of Chronopharmacology

JF - Annual Review of Chronopharmacology

SN - 0743-9539

IS - 5

ER -