Digital innocence

Joshua A T Fairfield, Erik Luna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent revelations have shown that almost all online activity and increasing amounts of offline activity are tracked using Big Data and data mining technologies. The ensuing debate has largely failed to consider an important consequence of mass surveillance: the obligation to provide access to information that might exonerate a criminal defendant. Although information technology can establish innocence-an ability that will only improve with technological advance-the fruits of mass surveillance have been used almost exclusively to convict. To address the imbalance and inform public dialogue, this Article develops the concept of "digital innocence" as a means of leveraging the tools of Big Data, data mining, ubiquitous consumer tracking, and digital forensics to prevent wrongful convictions and to provide hard proof of actual innocence for those already convicted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)981-1076
Number of pages96
JournalCornell Law Review
Volume99
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

surveillance
obligation
information technology
dialogue
ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Fairfield, J. A. T., & Luna, E. (2014). Digital innocence. Cornell Law Review, 99(5), 981-1076.

Digital innocence. / Fairfield, Joshua A T; Luna, Erik.

In: Cornell Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 5, 2014, p. 981-1076.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fairfield, JAT & Luna, E 2014, 'Digital innocence', Cornell Law Review, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 981-1076.
Fairfield JAT, Luna E. Digital innocence. Cornell Law Review. 2014;99(5):981-1076.
Fairfield, Joshua A T ; Luna, Erik. / Digital innocence. In: Cornell Law Review. 2014 ; Vol. 99, No. 5. pp. 981-1076.
@article{cad78ce21a90405d838b5ed09e32a34f,
title = "Digital innocence",
abstract = "Recent revelations have shown that almost all online activity and increasing amounts of offline activity are tracked using Big Data and data mining technologies. The ensuing debate has largely failed to consider an important consequence of mass surveillance: the obligation to provide access to information that might exonerate a criminal defendant. Although information technology can establish innocence-an ability that will only improve with technological advance-the fruits of mass surveillance have been used almost exclusively to convict. To address the imbalance and inform public dialogue, this Article develops the concept of {"}digital innocence{"} as a means of leveraging the tools of Big Data, data mining, ubiquitous consumer tracking, and digital forensics to prevent wrongful convictions and to provide hard proof of actual innocence for those already convicted.",
author = "Fairfield, {Joshua A T} and Erik Luna",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "981--1076",
journal = "Cornell Law Review",
issn = "0010-8847",
publisher = "Cornell Law School",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital innocence

AU - Fairfield, Joshua A T

AU - Luna, Erik

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent revelations have shown that almost all online activity and increasing amounts of offline activity are tracked using Big Data and data mining technologies. The ensuing debate has largely failed to consider an important consequence of mass surveillance: the obligation to provide access to information that might exonerate a criminal defendant. Although information technology can establish innocence-an ability that will only improve with technological advance-the fruits of mass surveillance have been used almost exclusively to convict. To address the imbalance and inform public dialogue, this Article develops the concept of "digital innocence" as a means of leveraging the tools of Big Data, data mining, ubiquitous consumer tracking, and digital forensics to prevent wrongful convictions and to provide hard proof of actual innocence for those already convicted.

AB - Recent revelations have shown that almost all online activity and increasing amounts of offline activity are tracked using Big Data and data mining technologies. The ensuing debate has largely failed to consider an important consequence of mass surveillance: the obligation to provide access to information that might exonerate a criminal defendant. Although information technology can establish innocence-an ability that will only improve with technological advance-the fruits of mass surveillance have been used almost exclusively to convict. To address the imbalance and inform public dialogue, this Article develops the concept of "digital innocence" as a means of leveraging the tools of Big Data, data mining, ubiquitous consumer tracking, and digital forensics to prevent wrongful convictions and to provide hard proof of actual innocence for those already convicted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906534560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906534560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 981

EP - 1076

JO - Cornell Law Review

JF - Cornell Law Review

SN - 0010-8847

IS - 5

ER -