Abstract

Background: Similar to other domains, engineering education lacks a framework to classify active learning methods used in classrooms, which makes it difficult to evaluate when and why they are effective for learning. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study evaluated the effectiveness and applicability of the Differentiated Overt Learning Activities (DOLA) framework, which classifies learning activities as interactive, constructive, or active, for engineering classes. We tested the ICAP hypothesis that student learning is more effective in interactive than constructive activities, which are more effective than active activities, which are more effective than passive activities. Design/Method: We conducted two studies to determine how and to what degree differentiated activities affected student learning outcomes; we measured student knowledge and understanding of materials science and engineering concepts. Results: Study 1 showed that students scored higher on all postclass quiz questions after participating in interactive and constructive activities than after the active activities. Student scores on more difficult, inference questions suggested that interactive activities provided significantly deeper learning than constructive or active activities. Study 2 showed that student learning, in terms of gain scores, increased systematically from passive to active to constructive to interactive, as predicted by the ICAP hypothesis. All the increases, from condition to condition, were significant. Conclusions: Our analyses of classroom activities in the engineering domain showed that they fit within the taxonomy of the DOLA framework. The results of the two studies provided evidence to support the predictions of the ICAP hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)346-374
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Engineering Education
Volume102
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

instruction in engineering
Students
classroom
learning
engineering
student
Taxonomies
Engineering education
Materials science
quiz
learning method

Keywords

  • Active learning
  • Engineering learning
  • Instructional methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms. / Menekse, Muhsin; Stump, Glenda S.; Krause, Stephen; Chi, Michelene.

In: Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 102, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 346-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fff8922e96394b50971ac0d7aa74b3b2,
title = "Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms",
abstract = "Background: Similar to other domains, engineering education lacks a framework to classify active learning methods used in classrooms, which makes it difficult to evaluate when and why they are effective for learning. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study evaluated the effectiveness and applicability of the Differentiated Overt Learning Activities (DOLA) framework, which classifies learning activities as interactive, constructive, or active, for engineering classes. We tested the ICAP hypothesis that student learning is more effective in interactive than constructive activities, which are more effective than active activities, which are more effective than passive activities. Design/Method: We conducted two studies to determine how and to what degree differentiated activities affected student learning outcomes; we measured student knowledge and understanding of materials science and engineering concepts. Results: Study 1 showed that students scored higher on all postclass quiz questions after participating in interactive and constructive activities than after the active activities. Student scores on more difficult, inference questions suggested that interactive activities provided significantly deeper learning than constructive or active activities. Study 2 showed that student learning, in terms of gain scores, increased systematically from passive to active to constructive to interactive, as predicted by the ICAP hypothesis. All the increases, from condition to condition, were significant. Conclusions: Our analyses of classroom activities in the engineering domain showed that they fit within the taxonomy of the DOLA framework. The results of the two studies provided evidence to support the predictions of the ICAP hypothesis.",
keywords = "Active learning, Engineering learning, Instructional methods",
author = "Muhsin Menekse and Stump, {Glenda S.} and Stephen Krause and Michelene Chi",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/jee.20021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "346--374",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "1069-4730",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms

AU - Menekse, Muhsin

AU - Stump, Glenda S.

AU - Krause, Stephen

AU - Chi, Michelene

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Background: Similar to other domains, engineering education lacks a framework to classify active learning methods used in classrooms, which makes it difficult to evaluate when and why they are effective for learning. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study evaluated the effectiveness and applicability of the Differentiated Overt Learning Activities (DOLA) framework, which classifies learning activities as interactive, constructive, or active, for engineering classes. We tested the ICAP hypothesis that student learning is more effective in interactive than constructive activities, which are more effective than active activities, which are more effective than passive activities. Design/Method: We conducted two studies to determine how and to what degree differentiated activities affected student learning outcomes; we measured student knowledge and understanding of materials science and engineering concepts. Results: Study 1 showed that students scored higher on all postclass quiz questions after participating in interactive and constructive activities than after the active activities. Student scores on more difficult, inference questions suggested that interactive activities provided significantly deeper learning than constructive or active activities. Study 2 showed that student learning, in terms of gain scores, increased systematically from passive to active to constructive to interactive, as predicted by the ICAP hypothesis. All the increases, from condition to condition, were significant. Conclusions: Our analyses of classroom activities in the engineering domain showed that they fit within the taxonomy of the DOLA framework. The results of the two studies provided evidence to support the predictions of the ICAP hypothesis.

AB - Background: Similar to other domains, engineering education lacks a framework to classify active learning methods used in classrooms, which makes it difficult to evaluate when and why they are effective for learning. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study evaluated the effectiveness and applicability of the Differentiated Overt Learning Activities (DOLA) framework, which classifies learning activities as interactive, constructive, or active, for engineering classes. We tested the ICAP hypothesis that student learning is more effective in interactive than constructive activities, which are more effective than active activities, which are more effective than passive activities. Design/Method: We conducted two studies to determine how and to what degree differentiated activities affected student learning outcomes; we measured student knowledge and understanding of materials science and engineering concepts. Results: Study 1 showed that students scored higher on all postclass quiz questions after participating in interactive and constructive activities than after the active activities. Student scores on more difficult, inference questions suggested that interactive activities provided significantly deeper learning than constructive or active activities. Study 2 showed that student learning, in terms of gain scores, increased systematically from passive to active to constructive to interactive, as predicted by the ICAP hypothesis. All the increases, from condition to condition, were significant. Conclusions: Our analyses of classroom activities in the engineering domain showed that they fit within the taxonomy of the DOLA framework. The results of the two studies provided evidence to support the predictions of the ICAP hypothesis.

KW - Active learning

KW - Engineering learning

KW - Instructional methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885900408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885900408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jee.20021

DO - 10.1002/jee.20021

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885900408

VL - 102

SP - 346

EP - 374

JO - Journal of Engineering Education

JF - Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 1069-4730

IS - 3

ER -