Abstract

Academic productivity is realized through resources obtained from professional networks in which scientists are embedded. Using a national survey of academic faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields across multiple institution types, we examine how the structure of professional networks affects scholarly productivity and how those effects may differ by race, ethnicity, and gender. We find that network size masks important differences in composition. Using negative binomial regression, we find that both the size and composition of professional networks affect scientific productivity, but bigger is not always better. We find that instrumental networks increase scholarly productivity, while advice networks reduce it. There are important interactive effects that are masked by modeling only direct effects. We find that white men are especially advantaged by instrumental networks, and women are especially advantaged by advice networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)570-599
Number of pages30
JournalScience Technology and Human Values
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

social network
Productivity
productivity
Chemical analysis
Masks
Social networks
Network effects
Social Networks
ethnicity
mathematics
engineering
regression
gender
science
resources

Keywords

  • academic productivity
  • advice networks
  • gender
  • social networks
  • underrepresented minorities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

Differential Social Network Effects on Scholarly Productivity : An Intersectional Analysis. / Gaughan, Monica; Melkers, Julia; Welch, Eric.

In: Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 570-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f39b242314ec418e9a5e98aaed8deaf7,
title = "Differential Social Network Effects on Scholarly Productivity: An Intersectional Analysis",
abstract = "Academic productivity is realized through resources obtained from professional networks in which scientists are embedded. Using a national survey of academic faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields across multiple institution types, we examine how the structure of professional networks affects scholarly productivity and how those effects may differ by race, ethnicity, and gender. We find that network size masks important differences in composition. Using negative binomial regression, we find that both the size and composition of professional networks affect scientific productivity, but bigger is not always better. We find that instrumental networks increase scholarly productivity, while advice networks reduce it. There are important interactive effects that are masked by modeling only direct effects. We find that white men are especially advantaged by instrumental networks, and women are especially advantaged by advice networks.",
keywords = "academic productivity, advice networks, gender, social networks, underrepresented minorities",
author = "Monica Gaughan and Julia Melkers and Eric Welch",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0162243917735900",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "570--599",
journal = "Science Technology and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential Social Network Effects on Scholarly Productivity

T2 - An Intersectional Analysis

AU - Gaughan, Monica

AU - Melkers, Julia

AU - Welch, Eric

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Academic productivity is realized through resources obtained from professional networks in which scientists are embedded. Using a national survey of academic faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields across multiple institution types, we examine how the structure of professional networks affects scholarly productivity and how those effects may differ by race, ethnicity, and gender. We find that network size masks important differences in composition. Using negative binomial regression, we find that both the size and composition of professional networks affect scientific productivity, but bigger is not always better. We find that instrumental networks increase scholarly productivity, while advice networks reduce it. There are important interactive effects that are masked by modeling only direct effects. We find that white men are especially advantaged by instrumental networks, and women are especially advantaged by advice networks.

AB - Academic productivity is realized through resources obtained from professional networks in which scientists are embedded. Using a national survey of academic faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields across multiple institution types, we examine how the structure of professional networks affects scholarly productivity and how those effects may differ by race, ethnicity, and gender. We find that network size masks important differences in composition. Using negative binomial regression, we find that both the size and composition of professional networks affect scientific productivity, but bigger is not always better. We find that instrumental networks increase scholarly productivity, while advice networks reduce it. There are important interactive effects that are masked by modeling only direct effects. We find that white men are especially advantaged by instrumental networks, and women are especially advantaged by advice networks.

KW - academic productivity

KW - advice networks

KW - gender

KW - social networks

KW - underrepresented minorities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044821494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044821494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0162243917735900

DO - 10.1177/0162243917735900

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 570

EP - 599

JO - Science Technology and Human Values

JF - Science Technology and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 3

ER -