Differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the US and China: Measurement bias matters

Hairong Song, Huajian Cai, Jonathon D. Brown, Kevin Grimm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using an item-response theory-based approach (i.e. likelihood ratio test with an iterative procedure), we examined the equivalence of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in a sample of US and Chinese college students. Results from the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed that the RSES was not fully equivalent at the item level, as well as at the scale level. The two cultural groups did not use the scale comparably, with the US students showing more extreme responses than the Chinese students. Moreover, we evaluated the practical impact of DIF and found that cultural differences in average self-esteem scores disappeared after the DIF was taken into account. In the present study, we discuss the implications of our findings for cross-cultural research and provide suggestions for future studies using the RSES in China.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-188
Number of pages13
JournalAsian Journal of Social Psychology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Self Concept
self-esteem
China
trend
Students
item analysis
student
equivalence
cultural difference
Research
Group

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Differential item functioning
  • Item-response theory
  • Self-esteem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the US and China : Measurement bias matters. / Song, Hairong; Cai, Huajian; Brown, Jonathon D.; Grimm, Kevin.

In: Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 176-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b4b0a98b7d540cdb02a63c2c3bf135a,
title = "Differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the US and China: Measurement bias matters",
abstract = "Using an item-response theory-based approach (i.e. likelihood ratio test with an iterative procedure), we examined the equivalence of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in a sample of US and Chinese college students. Results from the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed that the RSES was not fully equivalent at the item level, as well as at the scale level. The two cultural groups did not use the scale comparably, with the US students showing more extreme responses than the Chinese students. Moreover, we evaluated the practical impact of DIF and found that cultural differences in average self-esteem scores disappeared after the DIF was taken into account. In the present study, we discuss the implications of our findings for cross-cultural research and provide suggestions for future studies using the RSES in China.",
keywords = "Culture, Differential item functioning, Item-response theory, Self-esteem",
author = "Hairong Song and Huajian Cai and Brown, {Jonathon D.} and Kevin Grimm",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01347.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "176--188",
journal = "Asian Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "1367-2223",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the US and China

T2 - Measurement bias matters

AU - Song, Hairong

AU - Cai, Huajian

AU - Brown, Jonathon D.

AU - Grimm, Kevin

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Using an item-response theory-based approach (i.e. likelihood ratio test with an iterative procedure), we examined the equivalence of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in a sample of US and Chinese college students. Results from the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed that the RSES was not fully equivalent at the item level, as well as at the scale level. The two cultural groups did not use the scale comparably, with the US students showing more extreme responses than the Chinese students. Moreover, we evaluated the practical impact of DIF and found that cultural differences in average self-esteem scores disappeared after the DIF was taken into account. In the present study, we discuss the implications of our findings for cross-cultural research and provide suggestions for future studies using the RSES in China.

AB - Using an item-response theory-based approach (i.e. likelihood ratio test with an iterative procedure), we examined the equivalence of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in a sample of US and Chinese college students. Results from the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed that the RSES was not fully equivalent at the item level, as well as at the scale level. The two cultural groups did not use the scale comparably, with the US students showing more extreme responses than the Chinese students. Moreover, we evaluated the practical impact of DIF and found that cultural differences in average self-esteem scores disappeared after the DIF was taken into account. In the present study, we discuss the implications of our findings for cross-cultural research and provide suggestions for future studies using the RSES in China.

KW - Culture

KW - Differential item functioning

KW - Item-response theory

KW - Self-esteem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860416548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860416548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01347.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01347.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860416548

VL - 14

SP - 176

EP - 188

JO - Asian Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Asian Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 1367-2223

IS - 3

ER -