Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing from qualitative data gathered at two correctional facilities, this paper empirically illustrates employee reactions to organizational contradictions in a total institution and advances a theoretical model positing that organizational tensions may be framed as complementary dialectics, simple contradictions, or pragmatic paradoxes - each accompanied by attendant organizational and personal ramifications. The analysis suggests that organizations can create structures in which employees are more likely to make sense of organizational contradictions in healthy ways and avoid the debilitating reactions associated with double binds. Specifically, through metacommunication about organizational tensions (for instance, manifest in role play enactment of contradictory occupational goals), employees are better able to understand the paradoxes that mark work life and make sense of them in emotionally healthy ways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-146
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Applied Communication Research
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

dialectics
employee
Personnel
total institution
role play
pragmatics
Employees
Dialectics
Double Bind
Paradox

Keywords

  • Burnout
  • Contradiction
  • Correctional Facility
  • Double Bind
  • Emotion
  • Gender
  • Paradox
  • Total Institution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

@article{89f51a6a54314afcb60e547199a8c8d6,
title = "Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension",
abstract = "Drawing from qualitative data gathered at two correctional facilities, this paper empirically illustrates employee reactions to organizational contradictions in a total institution and advances a theoretical model positing that organizational tensions may be framed as complementary dialectics, simple contradictions, or pragmatic paradoxes - each accompanied by attendant organizational and personal ramifications. The analysis suggests that organizations can create structures in which employees are more likely to make sense of organizational contradictions in healthy ways and avoid the debilitating reactions associated with double binds. Specifically, through metacommunication about organizational tensions (for instance, manifest in role play enactment of contradictory occupational goals), employees are better able to understand the paradoxes that mark work life and make sense of them in emotionally healthy ways.",
keywords = "Burnout, Contradiction, Correctional Facility, Double Bind, Emotion, Gender, Paradox, Total Institution",
author = "Sarah Tracy",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/0090988042000210025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "119--146",
journal = "Journal of Applied Communication Research",
issn = "0090-9882",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension

AU - Tracy, Sarah

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Drawing from qualitative data gathered at two correctional facilities, this paper empirically illustrates employee reactions to organizational contradictions in a total institution and advances a theoretical model positing that organizational tensions may be framed as complementary dialectics, simple contradictions, or pragmatic paradoxes - each accompanied by attendant organizational and personal ramifications. The analysis suggests that organizations can create structures in which employees are more likely to make sense of organizational contradictions in healthy ways and avoid the debilitating reactions associated with double binds. Specifically, through metacommunication about organizational tensions (for instance, manifest in role play enactment of contradictory occupational goals), employees are better able to understand the paradoxes that mark work life and make sense of them in emotionally healthy ways.

AB - Drawing from qualitative data gathered at two correctional facilities, this paper empirically illustrates employee reactions to organizational contradictions in a total institution and advances a theoretical model positing that organizational tensions may be framed as complementary dialectics, simple contradictions, or pragmatic paradoxes - each accompanied by attendant organizational and personal ramifications. The analysis suggests that organizations can create structures in which employees are more likely to make sense of organizational contradictions in healthy ways and avoid the debilitating reactions associated with double binds. Specifically, through metacommunication about organizational tensions (for instance, manifest in role play enactment of contradictory occupational goals), employees are better able to understand the paradoxes that mark work life and make sense of them in emotionally healthy ways.

KW - Burnout

KW - Contradiction

KW - Correctional Facility

KW - Double Bind

KW - Emotion

KW - Gender

KW - Paradox

KW - Total Institution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642581804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642581804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0090988042000210025

DO - 10.1080/0090988042000210025

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 119

EP - 146

JO - Journal of Applied Communication Research

JF - Journal of Applied Communication Research

SN - 0090-9882

IS - 2

ER -