Development of modulus and fatigue test protocol for fine aggregate matrix for axial direction of loading

P. P. Gudipudi, B. S. Underwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The testing of fine aggregatematrix (FAM) is rapidly gaining attention in the pavement research community because of its notable similarities with asphalt concrete (AC) and the increased testing efficiency that it affords. Inmost of the existing studies, FAM tests are used for characterization of relative material performance in the presence of phenomenon like moisture damage and healing. However, to better understand the fundamental properties of FAM and to establish the mechanistic connection between its properties and those of AC, proper fabrication and testing protocols need to be established. The focus of this research is to develop such standard testing protocols for both dynamic modulus and uniaxial fatigue testing. In the current effort, two FAM materials are prepared with the same gradation but two different asphalt cements (PG 64-22 and PG 76-16). Pilot studies to support the development of sample fabrication protocols are explained. Both FAM materials are tested for modulus and uniaxial fatigue, and during testing both on-specimen andmachine actuator displacement are recorded. Material parameterswere separately calculated using these two deformation measurements and compared to uncover the errors resulting frommachine-basedmeasurements of FAM. The percentage error inmeasuring dynamicmodulus of FAMspecimens using actuator strain ranged from 5 % to 79 %. After correcting actuator strain with a constant machine compliance factor, the percentage error changed to 10 %-32 %, which is still high. In addition, variation in time dependency and fatigue damage characterization was observed using the corrected actuator data to on-specimen data. To overcome all of the above issues andmeasure reliable test data for FAM, it is concluded that protocols must include measurement of on-specimen deformation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-508
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Testing and Evaluation
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Fatigue of materials
Actuators
Testing
Asphalt concrete
asphalt
Fabrication
Fatigue testing
Fatigue damage
Asphalt
Pavements
Cements
Moisture
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Asphalt concrete
  • Axial testing
  • Dynamicmodulus
  • Fine aggregatematrix
  • Machine compliance factor
  • Uniaxial fatigue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Development of modulus and fatigue test protocol for fine aggregate matrix for axial direction of loading. / Gudipudi, P. P.; Underwood, B. S.

In: Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2017, p. 497-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78856d4571c548a09465b8fe060c5292,
title = "Development of modulus and fatigue test protocol for fine aggregate matrix for axial direction of loading",
abstract = "The testing of fine aggregatematrix (FAM) is rapidly gaining attention in the pavement research community because of its notable similarities with asphalt concrete (AC) and the increased testing efficiency that it affords. Inmost of the existing studies, FAM tests are used for characterization of relative material performance in the presence of phenomenon like moisture damage and healing. However, to better understand the fundamental properties of FAM and to establish the mechanistic connection between its properties and those of AC, proper fabrication and testing protocols need to be established. The focus of this research is to develop such standard testing protocols for both dynamic modulus and uniaxial fatigue testing. In the current effort, two FAM materials are prepared with the same gradation but two different asphalt cements (PG 64-22 and PG 76-16). Pilot studies to support the development of sample fabrication protocols are explained. Both FAM materials are tested for modulus and uniaxial fatigue, and during testing both on-specimen andmachine actuator displacement are recorded. Material parameterswere separately calculated using these two deformation measurements and compared to uncover the errors resulting frommachine-basedmeasurements of FAM. The percentage error inmeasuring dynamicmodulus of FAMspecimens using actuator strain ranged from 5 {\%} to 79 {\%}. After correcting actuator strain with a constant machine compliance factor, the percentage error changed to 10 {\%}-32 {\%}, which is still high. In addition, variation in time dependency and fatigue damage characterization was observed using the corrected actuator data to on-specimen data. To overcome all of the above issues andmeasure reliable test data for FAM, it is concluded that protocols must include measurement of on-specimen deformation.",
keywords = "Asphalt concrete, Axial testing, Dynamicmodulus, Fine aggregatematrix, Machine compliance factor, Uniaxial fatigue",
author = "Gudipudi, {P. P.} and Underwood, {B. S.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1520/JTE20150295",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "497--508",
journal = "Journal of Testing and Evaluation",
issn = "0090-3973",
publisher = "American Society for Testing and Materials",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of modulus and fatigue test protocol for fine aggregate matrix for axial direction of loading

AU - Gudipudi, P. P.

AU - Underwood, B. S.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The testing of fine aggregatematrix (FAM) is rapidly gaining attention in the pavement research community because of its notable similarities with asphalt concrete (AC) and the increased testing efficiency that it affords. Inmost of the existing studies, FAM tests are used for characterization of relative material performance in the presence of phenomenon like moisture damage and healing. However, to better understand the fundamental properties of FAM and to establish the mechanistic connection between its properties and those of AC, proper fabrication and testing protocols need to be established. The focus of this research is to develop such standard testing protocols for both dynamic modulus and uniaxial fatigue testing. In the current effort, two FAM materials are prepared with the same gradation but two different asphalt cements (PG 64-22 and PG 76-16). Pilot studies to support the development of sample fabrication protocols are explained. Both FAM materials are tested for modulus and uniaxial fatigue, and during testing both on-specimen andmachine actuator displacement are recorded. Material parameterswere separately calculated using these two deformation measurements and compared to uncover the errors resulting frommachine-basedmeasurements of FAM. The percentage error inmeasuring dynamicmodulus of FAMspecimens using actuator strain ranged from 5 % to 79 %. After correcting actuator strain with a constant machine compliance factor, the percentage error changed to 10 %-32 %, which is still high. In addition, variation in time dependency and fatigue damage characterization was observed using the corrected actuator data to on-specimen data. To overcome all of the above issues andmeasure reliable test data for FAM, it is concluded that protocols must include measurement of on-specimen deformation.

AB - The testing of fine aggregatematrix (FAM) is rapidly gaining attention in the pavement research community because of its notable similarities with asphalt concrete (AC) and the increased testing efficiency that it affords. Inmost of the existing studies, FAM tests are used for characterization of relative material performance in the presence of phenomenon like moisture damage and healing. However, to better understand the fundamental properties of FAM and to establish the mechanistic connection between its properties and those of AC, proper fabrication and testing protocols need to be established. The focus of this research is to develop such standard testing protocols for both dynamic modulus and uniaxial fatigue testing. In the current effort, two FAM materials are prepared with the same gradation but two different asphalt cements (PG 64-22 and PG 76-16). Pilot studies to support the development of sample fabrication protocols are explained. Both FAM materials are tested for modulus and uniaxial fatigue, and during testing both on-specimen andmachine actuator displacement are recorded. Material parameterswere separately calculated using these two deformation measurements and compared to uncover the errors resulting frommachine-basedmeasurements of FAM. The percentage error inmeasuring dynamicmodulus of FAMspecimens using actuator strain ranged from 5 % to 79 %. After correcting actuator strain with a constant machine compliance factor, the percentage error changed to 10 %-32 %, which is still high. In addition, variation in time dependency and fatigue damage characterization was observed using the corrected actuator data to on-specimen data. To overcome all of the above issues andmeasure reliable test data for FAM, it is concluded that protocols must include measurement of on-specimen deformation.

KW - Asphalt concrete

KW - Axial testing

KW - Dynamicmodulus

KW - Fine aggregatematrix

KW - Machine compliance factor

KW - Uniaxial fatigue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018425398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018425398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1520/JTE20150295

DO - 10.1520/JTE20150295

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018425398

VL - 45

SP - 497

EP - 508

JO - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

JF - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

SN - 0090-3973

IS - 2

ER -