Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products: contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases

Benjamin D. Trump, Christy Foran, Taylor Rycroft, Matthew D. Wood, Nirzwan Bandolin, Mariana Cains, Timothy Cary, Fiona Crocker, Nicholas A. Friedenberg, Patrick Gurian, Kerry Hamilton, Jan Jeffrey Hoover, Corey Meyer, Kaytee Pokrzywinski, Ryan Ritterson, Paul Schulte, Christopher Warner, Edward Perkins, Igor Linkov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Synthetic biology has the potential for a broad array of applications. However, realization of this potential is challenged by the paucity of relevant data for conventional risk assessment protocols, a limitation due to to the relative nascence of the field, as well as the poorly characterized and prioritized hazard, exposure, and dose–response considerations associated with the development and use of synthetic biology-derived organisms. Where quantitative risk assessment approaches are necessarily to fulfill regulatory requirements for review of products containing genetically modified organisms, this paper reviews one potential avenue for early-stage quantitative risk assessment for biosafety considerations of synthetic biology organism deployment into the environment. Building from discussion from a March 2018 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center workshop on developing such quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology, this paper reviews the findings and discussion of workshop participants. This paper concludes that, while synthetic biology risk assessment and governance will continue to refine and develop in the coming years, a quantitative framework that builds from existing practice is one potentially beneficial option for risk assessors that must contend with the technology’s limited hazard characterization or exposure assessment considerations in the near term.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-527
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironment Systems and Decisions
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

bioremediation
risk assessment
pollutant
hazard
biosafety
genetically modified organism
research and development
product
organism
exposure

Keywords

  • Risk assessment
  • Synthetic biology
  • Technology governance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products : contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases. / Trump, Benjamin D.; Foran, Christy; Rycroft, Taylor; Wood, Matthew D.; Bandolin, Nirzwan; Cains, Mariana; Cary, Timothy; Crocker, Fiona; Friedenberg, Nicholas A.; Gurian, Patrick; Hamilton, Kerry; Hoover, Jan Jeffrey; Meyer, Corey; Pokrzywinski, Kaytee; Ritterson, Ryan; Schulte, Paul; Warner, Christopher; Perkins, Edward; Linkov, Igor.

In: Environment Systems and Decisions, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 517-527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trump, BD, Foran, C, Rycroft, T, Wood, MD, Bandolin, N, Cains, M, Cary, T, Crocker, F, Friedenberg, NA, Gurian, P, Hamilton, K, Hoover, JJ, Meyer, C, Pokrzywinski, K, Ritterson, R, Schulte, P, Warner, C, Perkins, E & Linkov, I 2018, 'Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products: contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases', Environment Systems and Decisions, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9710-9
Trump, Benjamin D. ; Foran, Christy ; Rycroft, Taylor ; Wood, Matthew D. ; Bandolin, Nirzwan ; Cains, Mariana ; Cary, Timothy ; Crocker, Fiona ; Friedenberg, Nicholas A. ; Gurian, Patrick ; Hamilton, Kerry ; Hoover, Jan Jeffrey ; Meyer, Corey ; Pokrzywinski, Kaytee ; Ritterson, Ryan ; Schulte, Paul ; Warner, Christopher ; Perkins, Edward ; Linkov, Igor. / Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products : contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases. In: Environment Systems and Decisions. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 517-527.
@article{322099840bba4c879b6cd6331a91f15a,
title = "Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products: contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases",
abstract = "Synthetic biology has the potential for a broad array of applications. However, realization of this potential is challenged by the paucity of relevant data for conventional risk assessment protocols, a limitation due to to the relative nascence of the field, as well as the poorly characterized and prioritized hazard, exposure, and dose–response considerations associated with the development and use of synthetic biology-derived organisms. Where quantitative risk assessment approaches are necessarily to fulfill regulatory requirements for review of products containing genetically modified organisms, this paper reviews one potential avenue for early-stage quantitative risk assessment for biosafety considerations of synthetic biology organism deployment into the environment. Building from discussion from a March 2018 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center workshop on developing such quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology, this paper reviews the findings and discussion of workshop participants. This paper concludes that, while synthetic biology risk assessment and governance will continue to refine and develop in the coming years, a quantitative framework that builds from existing practice is one potentially beneficial option for risk assessors that must contend with the technology’s limited hazard characterization or exposure assessment considerations in the near term.",
keywords = "Risk assessment, Synthetic biology, Technology governance",
author = "Trump, {Benjamin D.} and Christy Foran and Taylor Rycroft and Wood, {Matthew D.} and Nirzwan Bandolin and Mariana Cains and Timothy Cary and Fiona Crocker and Friedenberg, {Nicholas A.} and Patrick Gurian and Kerry Hamilton and Hoover, {Jan Jeffrey} and Corey Meyer and Kaytee Pokrzywinski and Ryan Ritterson and Paul Schulte and Christopher Warner and Edward Perkins and Igor Linkov",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10669-018-9710-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "517--527",
journal = "Environment Systems and Decisions",
issn = "2194-5403",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products

T2 - contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases

AU - Trump, Benjamin D.

AU - Foran, Christy

AU - Rycroft, Taylor

AU - Wood, Matthew D.

AU - Bandolin, Nirzwan

AU - Cains, Mariana

AU - Cary, Timothy

AU - Crocker, Fiona

AU - Friedenberg, Nicholas A.

AU - Gurian, Patrick

AU - Hamilton, Kerry

AU - Hoover, Jan Jeffrey

AU - Meyer, Corey

AU - Pokrzywinski, Kaytee

AU - Ritterson, Ryan

AU - Schulte, Paul

AU - Warner, Christopher

AU - Perkins, Edward

AU - Linkov, Igor

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Synthetic biology has the potential for a broad array of applications. However, realization of this potential is challenged by the paucity of relevant data for conventional risk assessment protocols, a limitation due to to the relative nascence of the field, as well as the poorly characterized and prioritized hazard, exposure, and dose–response considerations associated with the development and use of synthetic biology-derived organisms. Where quantitative risk assessment approaches are necessarily to fulfill regulatory requirements for review of products containing genetically modified organisms, this paper reviews one potential avenue for early-stage quantitative risk assessment for biosafety considerations of synthetic biology organism deployment into the environment. Building from discussion from a March 2018 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center workshop on developing such quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology, this paper reviews the findings and discussion of workshop participants. This paper concludes that, while synthetic biology risk assessment and governance will continue to refine and develop in the coming years, a quantitative framework that builds from existing practice is one potentially beneficial option for risk assessors that must contend with the technology’s limited hazard characterization or exposure assessment considerations in the near term.

AB - Synthetic biology has the potential for a broad array of applications. However, realization of this potential is challenged by the paucity of relevant data for conventional risk assessment protocols, a limitation due to to the relative nascence of the field, as well as the poorly characterized and prioritized hazard, exposure, and dose–response considerations associated with the development and use of synthetic biology-derived organisms. Where quantitative risk assessment approaches are necessarily to fulfill regulatory requirements for review of products containing genetically modified organisms, this paper reviews one potential avenue for early-stage quantitative risk assessment for biosafety considerations of synthetic biology organism deployment into the environment. Building from discussion from a March 2018 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center workshop on developing such quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology, this paper reviews the findings and discussion of workshop participants. This paper concludes that, while synthetic biology risk assessment and governance will continue to refine and develop in the coming years, a quantitative framework that builds from existing practice is one potentially beneficial option for risk assessors that must contend with the technology’s limited hazard characterization or exposure assessment considerations in the near term.

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Synthetic biology

KW - Technology governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056081397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056081397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10669-018-9710-9

DO - 10.1007/s10669-018-9710-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056081397

VL - 38

SP - 517

EP - 527

JO - Environment Systems and Decisions

JF - Environment Systems and Decisions

SN - 2194-5403

IS - 4

ER -