TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of the five-factor LAMBI measure of God representations.
AU - Johnson, Kathryn A.
AU - Okun, Morris A
AU - Cohen, Adam B.
AU - Sharp, Carissa A.
AU - Hook, Joshua N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Psychological Association
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - God representations are complex and there is no standard, relatively short, and easy to administer measure reflecting both anthropomorphic and abstract representations of God. We developed a new measure with 5 dimensions: limitless, authoritarian, mystical, benevolent, and ineffable (the LAMBI scale). In Study 1, we used exploratory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of a preliminary list of 41 common adjectives that people might use to describe God. In Study 2, we identified the 25 best-fitting items, using confirmatory factor analysis to show that a 5-factor model fit well, and began to validate the new scale using measures of religious commitment, individualistic spirituality, and quest. In Study 3, we found the scale has good test–retest reliability. In Study 4, we examined the contribution of the LAMBI scales in predicting conservatism, values, and beliefs, above and beyond two existing measures of God representations. In Study 5, we used latent profile analysis to identify four response patterns across the five dimensions: relational, abstract, unbelief, and amorphous (no differences across the five dimensions) and show little relation between these profiles and religious group membership. We conclude that the LAMBI scale assesses important individual differences in thinking about God and can potentially be used to predict beliefs and social attitudes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
AB - God representations are complex and there is no standard, relatively short, and easy to administer measure reflecting both anthropomorphic and abstract representations of God. We developed a new measure with 5 dimensions: limitless, authoritarian, mystical, benevolent, and ineffable (the LAMBI scale). In Study 1, we used exploratory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of a preliminary list of 41 common adjectives that people might use to describe God. In Study 2, we identified the 25 best-fitting items, using confirmatory factor analysis to show that a 5-factor model fit well, and began to validate the new scale using measures of religious commitment, individualistic spirituality, and quest. In Study 3, we found the scale has good test–retest reliability. In Study 4, we examined the contribution of the LAMBI scales in predicting conservatism, values, and beliefs, above and beyond two existing measures of God representations. In Study 5, we used latent profile analysis to identify four response patterns across the five dimensions: relational, abstract, unbelief, and amorphous (no differences across the five dimensions) and show little relation between these profiles and religious group membership. We conclude that the LAMBI scale assesses important individual differences in thinking about God and can potentially be used to predict beliefs and social attitudes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
KW - God concepts
KW - God representations
KW - deism
KW - panentheism
KW - pantheism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048710317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048710317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/rel0000207
DO - 10.1037/rel0000207
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048710317
SN - 1941-1022
VL - 11
SP - 339
EP - 349
JO - Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
JF - Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
IS - 4
ER -