Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire

Charles E. Matthews, Barbara Ainsworth, Cara Hanby, Russell R. Pate, Cheryl Addy, Patty S. Freedson, Deborah Arriaza Jones, Caroline A. Macera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and test two different short telephone activity recall (STAR) questionnaires, one with closed-ended and the other with open-ended response options, that assessed overall moderate and vigorous activity in a usual week. Methods: One hundred four participants completed a 3-d test-retest study, and 88 participants completed 10-14, 24-h physical activity recalls (24PAR) and at least 7 d of objective physical activity monitoring by Actigraph during a 28-d period. Results: Consistency of classification from one administration to the next was high (65-92%), extreme inconsistencies between reports were infrequent (0-7%), and kappa values were between 0.50 and 0.75. Correlations between self-reports and criterion measures for moderate-intensity duration were between 0.30 and 0.40. Agreement between the instruments and the 24PAR for meeting the moderate or vigorous recommendations was between 60 and 70%. For the 24PAR comparisons, kappa values tended to be higher for women than men, but were of only modest strength (kappa 0.40). With the 24PAR as criterion, sensitivity of the self-report instruments was between 50 and 90%, and specificity was between 63 and 84%. Kappa values comparing the instruments with the Actigraph were low (<0.20). Overall classification by the short instruments into meeting the recommendations was associated with higher levels of total 24PAR activity (P ≤ 0.01) as well as greater steps per day and counts per minute per day from the Actigraph (P ≤ 0.08). The open-ended instrument appeared to perform better for moderate-intensity activity, whereas the closed-ended item appeared to perform better for vigorous activity. Conclusion: The evaluated instruments had reasonable reliability and demonstrated an ability to capture important differences in overall physical activity patterns in this population, although individual classification errors were substantial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)986-994
Number of pages9
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telephone
Population

Keywords

  • 24-h recall
  • Accelerometer
  • Exercise
  • Reliability
  • Surveillance
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Matthews, C. E., Ainsworth, B., Hanby, C., Pate, R. R., Addy, C., Freedson, P. S., ... Macera, C. A. (2005). Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37(6), 986-994. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000171615.76521.69

Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire. / Matthews, Charles E.; Ainsworth, Barbara; Hanby, Cara; Pate, Russell R.; Addy, Cheryl; Freedson, Patty S.; Jones, Deborah Arriaza; Macera, Caroline A.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 37, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 986-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matthews, CE, Ainsworth, B, Hanby, C, Pate, RR, Addy, C, Freedson, PS, Jones, DA & Macera, CA 2005, 'Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 986-994. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000171615.76521.69
Matthews, Charles E. ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Hanby, Cara ; Pate, Russell R. ; Addy, Cheryl ; Freedson, Patty S. ; Jones, Deborah Arriaza ; Macera, Caroline A. / Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2005 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 986-994.
@article{e497f472fc1f40e78a74a7515aac6ac6,
title = "Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop and test two different short telephone activity recall (STAR) questionnaires, one with closed-ended and the other with open-ended response options, that assessed overall moderate and vigorous activity in a usual week. Methods: One hundred four participants completed a 3-d test-retest study, and 88 participants completed 10-14, 24-h physical activity recalls (24PAR) and at least 7 d of objective physical activity monitoring by Actigraph during a 28-d period. Results: Consistency of classification from one administration to the next was high (65-92{\%}), extreme inconsistencies between reports were infrequent (0-7{\%}), and kappa values were between 0.50 and 0.75. Correlations between self-reports and criterion measures for moderate-intensity duration were between 0.30 and 0.40. Agreement between the instruments and the 24PAR for meeting the moderate or vigorous recommendations was between 60 and 70{\%}. For the 24PAR comparisons, kappa values tended to be higher for women than men, but were of only modest strength (kappa 0.40). With the 24PAR as criterion, sensitivity of the self-report instruments was between 50 and 90{\%}, and specificity was between 63 and 84{\%}. Kappa values comparing the instruments with the Actigraph were low (<0.20). Overall classification by the short instruments into meeting the recommendations was associated with higher levels of total 24PAR activity (P ≤ 0.01) as well as greater steps per day and counts per minute per day from the Actigraph (P ≤ 0.08). The open-ended instrument appeared to perform better for moderate-intensity activity, whereas the closed-ended item appeared to perform better for vigorous activity. Conclusion: The evaluated instruments had reasonable reliability and demonstrated an ability to capture important differences in overall physical activity patterns in this population, although individual classification errors were substantial.",
keywords = "24-h recall, Accelerometer, Exercise, Reliability, Surveillance, Validity",
author = "Matthews, {Charles E.} and Barbara Ainsworth and Cara Hanby and Pate, {Russell R.} and Cheryl Addy and Freedson, {Patty S.} and Jones, {Deborah Arriaza} and Macera, {Caroline A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1249/01.mss.0000171615.76521.69",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "986--994",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire

AU - Matthews, Charles E.

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Hanby, Cara

AU - Pate, Russell R.

AU - Addy, Cheryl

AU - Freedson, Patty S.

AU - Jones, Deborah Arriaza

AU - Macera, Caroline A.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Purpose: To develop and test two different short telephone activity recall (STAR) questionnaires, one with closed-ended and the other with open-ended response options, that assessed overall moderate and vigorous activity in a usual week. Methods: One hundred four participants completed a 3-d test-retest study, and 88 participants completed 10-14, 24-h physical activity recalls (24PAR) and at least 7 d of objective physical activity monitoring by Actigraph during a 28-d period. Results: Consistency of classification from one administration to the next was high (65-92%), extreme inconsistencies between reports were infrequent (0-7%), and kappa values were between 0.50 and 0.75. Correlations between self-reports and criterion measures for moderate-intensity duration were between 0.30 and 0.40. Agreement between the instruments and the 24PAR for meeting the moderate or vigorous recommendations was between 60 and 70%. For the 24PAR comparisons, kappa values tended to be higher for women than men, but were of only modest strength (kappa 0.40). With the 24PAR as criterion, sensitivity of the self-report instruments was between 50 and 90%, and specificity was between 63 and 84%. Kappa values comparing the instruments with the Actigraph were low (<0.20). Overall classification by the short instruments into meeting the recommendations was associated with higher levels of total 24PAR activity (P ≤ 0.01) as well as greater steps per day and counts per minute per day from the Actigraph (P ≤ 0.08). The open-ended instrument appeared to perform better for moderate-intensity activity, whereas the closed-ended item appeared to perform better for vigorous activity. Conclusion: The evaluated instruments had reasonable reliability and demonstrated an ability to capture important differences in overall physical activity patterns in this population, although individual classification errors were substantial.

AB - Purpose: To develop and test two different short telephone activity recall (STAR) questionnaires, one with closed-ended and the other with open-ended response options, that assessed overall moderate and vigorous activity in a usual week. Methods: One hundred four participants completed a 3-d test-retest study, and 88 participants completed 10-14, 24-h physical activity recalls (24PAR) and at least 7 d of objective physical activity monitoring by Actigraph during a 28-d period. Results: Consistency of classification from one administration to the next was high (65-92%), extreme inconsistencies between reports were infrequent (0-7%), and kappa values were between 0.50 and 0.75. Correlations between self-reports and criterion measures for moderate-intensity duration were between 0.30 and 0.40. Agreement between the instruments and the 24PAR for meeting the moderate or vigorous recommendations was between 60 and 70%. For the 24PAR comparisons, kappa values tended to be higher for women than men, but were of only modest strength (kappa 0.40). With the 24PAR as criterion, sensitivity of the self-report instruments was between 50 and 90%, and specificity was between 63 and 84%. Kappa values comparing the instruments with the Actigraph were low (<0.20). Overall classification by the short instruments into meeting the recommendations was associated with higher levels of total 24PAR activity (P ≤ 0.01) as well as greater steps per day and counts per minute per day from the Actigraph (P ≤ 0.08). The open-ended instrument appeared to perform better for moderate-intensity activity, whereas the closed-ended item appeared to perform better for vigorous activity. Conclusion: The evaluated instruments had reasonable reliability and demonstrated an ability to capture important differences in overall physical activity patterns in this population, although individual classification errors were substantial.

KW - 24-h recall

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Exercise

KW - Reliability

KW - Surveillance

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20544474412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20544474412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/01.mss.0000171615.76521.69

DO - 10.1249/01.mss.0000171615.76521.69

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 986

EP - 994

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 6

ER -