Developing measures of complexity for engineering design

Joshua D. Summers, Jami J. Shah

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Developing objective measures for evaluating the complexity of the design problems would facilitate empirical studies that require use of "equivalent" but different design problems, development of design curriculums, and comparison of computer aided design automation tools. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between design problem complexity, design process complexity, and design artifact complexity. Three fundamental aspects to complexity are identified: the size, the degree of coupling, and the solvability. Alternative methods for measuring these characteristics of the design are discussed based upon computational views of complexity, information based views of complexity, and traditional design views of complexity. A method of measuring size as it relates to complexity is proposed for measuring the information content of design. A second method is proposed for decomposing a graph-based representation of design that provides a measure of the interconnectedness as it relates to complexity. Finally, two methods are proposed for determining the solvability complexity of design based upon the effort involved and the degree of freedom of design. These measures are developed specifically for parametric and geometric problems as found in embodiment design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Pages381-392
Number of pages12
Volume3
StatePublished - 2003
Event2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - Chicago, IL, United States
Duration: Sep 2 2003Sep 6 2003

Other

Other2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
CountryUnited States
CityChicago, IL
Period9/2/039/6/03

Fingerprint

Curricula
Computer aided design
Automation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Summers, J. D., & Shah, J. J. (2003). Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. In Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 381-392)

Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. / Summers, Joshua D.; Shah, Jami J.

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Vol. 3 2003. p. 381-392.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Summers, JD & Shah, JJ 2003, Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. in Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. vol. 3, pp. 381-392, 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL, United States, 9/2/03.
Summers JD, Shah JJ. Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. In Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Vol. 3. 2003. p. 381-392
Summers, Joshua D. ; Shah, Jami J. / Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Vol. 3 2003. pp. 381-392
@inproceedings{9e4c121c1ee6435fad57971da23b753f,
title = "Developing measures of complexity for engineering design",
abstract = "Developing objective measures for evaluating the complexity of the design problems would facilitate empirical studies that require use of {"}equivalent{"} but different design problems, development of design curriculums, and comparison of computer aided design automation tools. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between design problem complexity, design process complexity, and design artifact complexity. Three fundamental aspects to complexity are identified: the size, the degree of coupling, and the solvability. Alternative methods for measuring these characteristics of the design are discussed based upon computational views of complexity, information based views of complexity, and traditional design views of complexity. A method of measuring size as it relates to complexity is proposed for measuring the information content of design. A second method is proposed for decomposing a graph-based representation of design that provides a measure of the interconnectedness as it relates to complexity. Finally, two methods are proposed for determining the solvability complexity of design based upon the effort involved and the degree of freedom of design. These measures are developed specifically for parametric and geometric problems as found in embodiment design.",
author = "Summers, {Joshua D.} and Shah, {Jami J.}",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "381--392",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Developing measures of complexity for engineering design

AU - Summers, Joshua D.

AU - Shah, Jami J.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Developing objective measures for evaluating the complexity of the design problems would facilitate empirical studies that require use of "equivalent" but different design problems, development of design curriculums, and comparison of computer aided design automation tools. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between design problem complexity, design process complexity, and design artifact complexity. Three fundamental aspects to complexity are identified: the size, the degree of coupling, and the solvability. Alternative methods for measuring these characteristics of the design are discussed based upon computational views of complexity, information based views of complexity, and traditional design views of complexity. A method of measuring size as it relates to complexity is proposed for measuring the information content of design. A second method is proposed for decomposing a graph-based representation of design that provides a measure of the interconnectedness as it relates to complexity. Finally, two methods are proposed for determining the solvability complexity of design based upon the effort involved and the degree of freedom of design. These measures are developed specifically for parametric and geometric problems as found in embodiment design.

AB - Developing objective measures for evaluating the complexity of the design problems would facilitate empirical studies that require use of "equivalent" but different design problems, development of design curriculums, and comparison of computer aided design automation tools. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between design problem complexity, design process complexity, and design artifact complexity. Three fundamental aspects to complexity are identified: the size, the degree of coupling, and the solvability. Alternative methods for measuring these characteristics of the design are discussed based upon computational views of complexity, information based views of complexity, and traditional design views of complexity. A method of measuring size as it relates to complexity is proposed for measuring the information content of design. A second method is proposed for decomposing a graph-based representation of design that provides a measure of the interconnectedness as it relates to complexity. Finally, two methods are proposed for determining the solvability complexity of design based upon the effort involved and the degree of freedom of design. These measures are developed specifically for parametric and geometric problems as found in embodiment design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842659126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842659126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 3

SP - 381

EP - 392

BT - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

ER -