Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention

Results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial

Eric B. Hekler, Matthew Buman, Jennifer Otten, Cynthia M. Castro, Lauren Grieco, Bess Marcus, Robert H. Friedman, Melissa A. Napolitano, Abby C. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline factors (i.e., demographics, motivation, interpersonal style, and external resources) that moderate intervention efficacy delivered by either a human or automated advisor.Methods: Data were from the CHAT Trial, a 12-month randomized controlled trial to increase PA among underactive older adults (full trial N = 218) via a human advisor or automated interactive voice response advisor. Trial results indicated significant increases in PA in both interventions by 12 months that were maintained at 18-months. Regression was used to explore moderation of the two interventions.Results: Results indicated amotivation (i.e., lack of intent in PA) moderated 12-month PA (d = 0.55, p < 0.01) and private self-consciousness (i.e., tendency to attune to one's own inner thoughts and emotions) moderated 18-month PA (d = 0.34, p < 0.05) but a variety of other factors (e.g., demographics) did not (p > 0.12).Conclusions: Results provide preliminary evidence for generating hypotheses about pathways for supporting later clinical decision-making with regard to the use of either human- vs. computer-delivered interventions for PA promotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number109
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 2013

Fingerprint

Telephone
Health
Health Behavior
Motivation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Demography
Research

Keywords

  • Behavioral intervention technology system
  • Interactive voice response
  • Intervention
  • Moderation
  • Physical activity
  • Targeting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention : Results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial. / Hekler, Eric B.; Buman, Matthew; Otten, Jennifer; Castro, Cynthia M.; Grieco, Lauren; Marcus, Bess; Friedman, Robert H.; Napolitano, Melissa A.; King, Abby C.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 10, 109, 22.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hekler, Eric B. ; Buman, Matthew ; Otten, Jennifer ; Castro, Cynthia M. ; Grieco, Lauren ; Marcus, Bess ; Friedman, Robert H. ; Napolitano, Melissa A. ; King, Abby C. / Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention : Results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial. In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2013 ; Vol. 10.
@article{c75eaa78029f4aa4ae0c8e08ca9ab7e0,
title = "Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention: Results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial",
abstract = "Background: Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline factors (i.e., demographics, motivation, interpersonal style, and external resources) that moderate intervention efficacy delivered by either a human or automated advisor.Methods: Data were from the CHAT Trial, a 12-month randomized controlled trial to increase PA among underactive older adults (full trial N = 218) via a human advisor or automated interactive voice response advisor. Trial results indicated significant increases in PA in both interventions by 12 months that were maintained at 18-months. Regression was used to explore moderation of the two interventions.Results: Results indicated amotivation (i.e., lack of intent in PA) moderated 12-month PA (d = 0.55, p < 0.01) and private self-consciousness (i.e., tendency to attune to one's own inner thoughts and emotions) moderated 18-month PA (d = 0.34, p < 0.05) but a variety of other factors (e.g., demographics) did not (p > 0.12).Conclusions: Results provide preliminary evidence for generating hypotheses about pathways for supporting later clinical decision-making with regard to the use of either human- vs. computer-delivered interventions for PA promotion.",
keywords = "Behavioral intervention technology system, Interactive voice response, Intervention, Moderation, Physical activity, Targeting",
author = "Hekler, {Eric B.} and Matthew Buman and Jennifer Otten and Castro, {Cynthia M.} and Lauren Grieco and Bess Marcus and Friedman, {Robert H.} and Napolitano, {Melissa A.} and King, {Abby C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/1479-5868-10-109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",
issn = "1479-5868",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention

T2 - Results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial

AU - Hekler, Eric B.

AU - Buman, Matthew

AU - Otten, Jennifer

AU - Castro, Cynthia M.

AU - Grieco, Lauren

AU - Marcus, Bess

AU - Friedman, Robert H.

AU - Napolitano, Melissa A.

AU - King, Abby C.

PY - 2013/9/22

Y1 - 2013/9/22

N2 - Background: Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline factors (i.e., demographics, motivation, interpersonal style, and external resources) that moderate intervention efficacy delivered by either a human or automated advisor.Methods: Data were from the CHAT Trial, a 12-month randomized controlled trial to increase PA among underactive older adults (full trial N = 218) via a human advisor or automated interactive voice response advisor. Trial results indicated significant increases in PA in both interventions by 12 months that were maintained at 18-months. Regression was used to explore moderation of the two interventions.Results: Results indicated amotivation (i.e., lack of intent in PA) moderated 12-month PA (d = 0.55, p < 0.01) and private self-consciousness (i.e., tendency to attune to one's own inner thoughts and emotions) moderated 18-month PA (d = 0.34, p < 0.05) but a variety of other factors (e.g., demographics) did not (p > 0.12).Conclusions: Results provide preliminary evidence for generating hypotheses about pathways for supporting later clinical decision-making with regard to the use of either human- vs. computer-delivered interventions for PA promotion.

AB - Background: Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline factors (i.e., demographics, motivation, interpersonal style, and external resources) that moderate intervention efficacy delivered by either a human or automated advisor.Methods: Data were from the CHAT Trial, a 12-month randomized controlled trial to increase PA among underactive older adults (full trial N = 218) via a human advisor or automated interactive voice response advisor. Trial results indicated significant increases in PA in both interventions by 12 months that were maintained at 18-months. Regression was used to explore moderation of the two interventions.Results: Results indicated amotivation (i.e., lack of intent in PA) moderated 12-month PA (d = 0.55, p < 0.01) and private self-consciousness (i.e., tendency to attune to one's own inner thoughts and emotions) moderated 18-month PA (d = 0.34, p < 0.05) but a variety of other factors (e.g., demographics) did not (p > 0.12).Conclusions: Results provide preliminary evidence for generating hypotheses about pathways for supporting later clinical decision-making with regard to the use of either human- vs. computer-delivered interventions for PA promotion.

KW - Behavioral intervention technology system

KW - Interactive voice response

KW - Intervention

KW - Moderation

KW - Physical activity

KW - Targeting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884308086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884308086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1479-5868-10-109

DO - 10.1186/1479-5868-10-109

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

SN - 1479-5868

M1 - 109

ER -