Determinate Sentencing In Illinois: An Assessment Of Its Development And Implementation

Lynne Goodstein, John Hepburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Observers of the process of legal reform caution that reforms often do not operate as intended by their formulators due to inhibitors at both the policy development and implementation stages. This paper traces the development and implementation of Illinois' determinate sentencing law in an attempt to determine the extent to which the formulators' objectives of sentence equity, release certainty, and non-coerced program participation have been met. The legal provisions and subsequent sentencing patterns are reviewed and evaluated with respect to their adherence to reformers' original objectives. As much of the law's impact was projected to occur at the correctional level, the implementation of determinate sentencing by correctional personnel is also reviewed in depth. Procedures regulating good time, supervised release and program participation reflect the continuation of discretionary decisionmaking and coerced treatment which conflict with the objectives of early advocates of determinacy. Inmates do, however, possess greater release certainty under the new law. Organizational and political factors are cited as accountable for the law's mixed success in meeting its original objectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-328
Number of pages24
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Law
legal provision
reform
participation
political factors
development policy
personnel
equity
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Determinate Sentencing In Illinois : An Assessment Of Its Development And Implementation. / Goodstein, Lynne; Hepburn, John.

In: Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1986, p. 305-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb01a4cbff68491c8606067bebe2d188,
title = "Determinate Sentencing In Illinois: An Assessment Of Its Development And Implementation",
abstract = "Observers of the process of legal reform caution that reforms often do not operate as intended by their formulators due to inhibitors at both the policy development and implementation stages. This paper traces the development and implementation of Illinois' determinate sentencing law in an attempt to determine the extent to which the formulators' objectives of sentence equity, release certainty, and non-coerced program participation have been met. The legal provisions and subsequent sentencing patterns are reviewed and evaluated with respect to their adherence to reformers' original objectives. As much of the law's impact was projected to occur at the correctional level, the implementation of determinate sentencing by correctional personnel is also reviewed in depth. Procedures regulating good time, supervised release and program participation reflect the continuation of discretionary decisionmaking and coerced treatment which conflict with the objectives of early advocates of determinacy. Inmates do, however, possess greater release certainty under the new law. Organizational and political factors are cited as accountable for the law's mixed success in meeting its original objectives.",
author = "Lynne Goodstein and John Hepburn",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1177/088740348600100304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "305--328",
journal = "Criminal Justice Policy Review",
issn = "0887-4034",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinate Sentencing In Illinois

T2 - An Assessment Of Its Development And Implementation

AU - Goodstein, Lynne

AU - Hepburn, John

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Observers of the process of legal reform caution that reforms often do not operate as intended by their formulators due to inhibitors at both the policy development and implementation stages. This paper traces the development and implementation of Illinois' determinate sentencing law in an attempt to determine the extent to which the formulators' objectives of sentence equity, release certainty, and non-coerced program participation have been met. The legal provisions and subsequent sentencing patterns are reviewed and evaluated with respect to their adherence to reformers' original objectives. As much of the law's impact was projected to occur at the correctional level, the implementation of determinate sentencing by correctional personnel is also reviewed in depth. Procedures regulating good time, supervised release and program participation reflect the continuation of discretionary decisionmaking and coerced treatment which conflict with the objectives of early advocates of determinacy. Inmates do, however, possess greater release certainty under the new law. Organizational and political factors are cited as accountable for the law's mixed success in meeting its original objectives.

AB - Observers of the process of legal reform caution that reforms often do not operate as intended by their formulators due to inhibitors at both the policy development and implementation stages. This paper traces the development and implementation of Illinois' determinate sentencing law in an attempt to determine the extent to which the formulators' objectives of sentence equity, release certainty, and non-coerced program participation have been met. The legal provisions and subsequent sentencing patterns are reviewed and evaluated with respect to their adherence to reformers' original objectives. As much of the law's impact was projected to occur at the correctional level, the implementation of determinate sentencing by correctional personnel is also reviewed in depth. Procedures regulating good time, supervised release and program participation reflect the continuation of discretionary decisionmaking and coerced treatment which conflict with the objectives of early advocates of determinacy. Inmates do, however, possess greater release certainty under the new law. Organizational and political factors are cited as accountable for the law's mixed success in meeting its original objectives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976912373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976912373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/088740348600100304

DO - 10.1177/088740348600100304

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84976912373

VL - 1

SP - 305

EP - 328

JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review

JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review

SN - 0887-4034

IS - 3

ER -