TY - JOUR
T1 - Designing theory
AU - Warr, Melissa
AU - Mishra, Punya
AU - Scragg, Ben
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Theoretical work is essential to the progress of any discipline. Theories, models, and frameworks are underdetermined representations of a phenomenon that help us understand and take action in a domain. However, the field of learning design and technology (LDT) has traditionally struggled with developing a solid theoretical foundation that is useful for both research and practice. We propose viewing theory building as an act of design might address these challenges. After defining key constructs and describing two approaches to theory development, we describe three design perspectives that might be useful for theory development: Lawson and Dorst’s (Design expertise, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009) view of design as a combination of analytical (problem-based) and creative (solution-based) moves, Schön’s (The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, Basic Books, New York, 1983) reflection-in-action, and design as dialogic interpretation (Snodgrass and Coyne in Des Issues 9(1):56–74, https://doi.org/10.2307/1511599, 1992). We use a case study to illustrate each perspective. We conclude with implications of a design approach to theory creation, including how design perspectives enable scholars to design possible futures.
AB - Theoretical work is essential to the progress of any discipline. Theories, models, and frameworks are underdetermined representations of a phenomenon that help us understand and take action in a domain. However, the field of learning design and technology (LDT) has traditionally struggled with developing a solid theoretical foundation that is useful for both research and practice. We propose viewing theory building as an act of design might address these challenges. After defining key constructs and describing two approaches to theory development, we describe three design perspectives that might be useful for theory development: Lawson and Dorst’s (Design expertise, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009) view of design as a combination of analytical (problem-based) and creative (solution-based) moves, Schön’s (The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, Basic Books, New York, 1983) reflection-in-action, and design as dialogic interpretation (Snodgrass and Coyne in Des Issues 9(1):56–74, https://doi.org/10.2307/1511599, 1992). We use a case study to illustrate each perspective. We conclude with implications of a design approach to theory creation, including how design perspectives enable scholars to design possible futures.
KW - Community of practice
KW - Design
KW - Design thinking
KW - TPACK
KW - Theory development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080946376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080946376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11423-020-09746-9
DO - 10.1007/s11423-020-09746-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85080946376
SN - 1042-1629
VL - 68
SP - 601
EP - 632
JO - Educational Technology Research and Development
JF - Educational Technology Research and Development
IS - 2
ER -