Design with Nature

Key lessons from McHarg's intrinsic suitability in the wake of Hurricane Sandy

Melissa Wagner, Joanna Merson, Elizabeth Wentz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mounting urban pressures and increasing vulnerability to disasters highlight the need for urban sustainability and ecological wisdom especially in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. In the 1960s, Ian McHarg examined land use suitability for Staten Island with attention to ecological planning by analyzing physical and cultural characteristics of land features and biophysical vulnerabilities such as tidal inundation and coastal flooding. In this paper, we examine the impact of Hurricane Sandy focusing on land use due to unsustainable planning on Staten Island. We utilize McHarg's Staten Island land use suitability study as a comparative example of a sustainable planning. We address the questions (1) whether or not McHarg's study would have prevented damage to homes and other urban structures using empirical analysis and (2) whether McHarg's recommendations were a realistic possibility. We quantify these differences using geospatial methods and statistical analysis. Our results show that (1) a significantly lower percentage of urban damage would have occurred if land use development followed McHarg's guidelines and (2) how conflicting economic and social ideals of development and zoning issues could explain why McHarg's study would have been difficult to implement. Our findings illustrate the tradeoffs between economic development with long term environmental benefits. This emphasizes the need and opportunity to work with nature and employ urban sustainability approaches and ecological wisdom to mitigate future threats.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 18 2015

Fingerprint

hurricane
land use
vulnerability
sustainability
damage
empirical analysis
zoning
disaster
statistical analysis
economic development
flooding
economics
planning
need

Keywords

  • Damage
  • Development
  • Hurricane Sandy
  • Ian McHarg
  • Land use suitability
  • Urban sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Design with Nature : Key lessons from McHarg's intrinsic suitability in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. / Wagner, Melissa; Merson, Joanna; Wentz, Elizabeth.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, 18.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8eb3e3eb3414a01b69d4f9243ca4dae,
title = "Design with Nature: Key lessons from McHarg's intrinsic suitability in the wake of Hurricane Sandy",
abstract = "Mounting urban pressures and increasing vulnerability to disasters highlight the need for urban sustainability and ecological wisdom especially in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. In the 1960s, Ian McHarg examined land use suitability for Staten Island with attention to ecological planning by analyzing physical and cultural characteristics of land features and biophysical vulnerabilities such as tidal inundation and coastal flooding. In this paper, we examine the impact of Hurricane Sandy focusing on land use due to unsustainable planning on Staten Island. We utilize McHarg's Staten Island land use suitability study as a comparative example of a sustainable planning. We address the questions (1) whether or not McHarg's study would have prevented damage to homes and other urban structures using empirical analysis and (2) whether McHarg's recommendations were a realistic possibility. We quantify these differences using geospatial methods and statistical analysis. Our results show that (1) a significantly lower percentage of urban damage would have occurred if land use development followed McHarg's guidelines and (2) how conflicting economic and social ideals of development and zoning issues could explain why McHarg's study would have been difficult to implement. Our findings illustrate the tradeoffs between economic development with long term environmental benefits. This emphasizes the need and opportunity to work with nature and employ urban sustainability approaches and ecological wisdom to mitigate future threats.",
keywords = "Damage, Development, Hurricane Sandy, Ian McHarg, Land use suitability, Urban sustainability",
author = "Melissa Wagner and Joanna Merson and Elizabeth Wentz",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design with Nature

T2 - Key lessons from McHarg's intrinsic suitability in the wake of Hurricane Sandy

AU - Wagner, Melissa

AU - Merson, Joanna

AU - Wentz, Elizabeth

PY - 2015/3/18

Y1 - 2015/3/18

N2 - Mounting urban pressures and increasing vulnerability to disasters highlight the need for urban sustainability and ecological wisdom especially in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. In the 1960s, Ian McHarg examined land use suitability for Staten Island with attention to ecological planning by analyzing physical and cultural characteristics of land features and biophysical vulnerabilities such as tidal inundation and coastal flooding. In this paper, we examine the impact of Hurricane Sandy focusing on land use due to unsustainable planning on Staten Island. We utilize McHarg's Staten Island land use suitability study as a comparative example of a sustainable planning. We address the questions (1) whether or not McHarg's study would have prevented damage to homes and other urban structures using empirical analysis and (2) whether McHarg's recommendations were a realistic possibility. We quantify these differences using geospatial methods and statistical analysis. Our results show that (1) a significantly lower percentage of urban damage would have occurred if land use development followed McHarg's guidelines and (2) how conflicting economic and social ideals of development and zoning issues could explain why McHarg's study would have been difficult to implement. Our findings illustrate the tradeoffs between economic development with long term environmental benefits. This emphasizes the need and opportunity to work with nature and employ urban sustainability approaches and ecological wisdom to mitigate future threats.

AB - Mounting urban pressures and increasing vulnerability to disasters highlight the need for urban sustainability and ecological wisdom especially in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. In the 1960s, Ian McHarg examined land use suitability for Staten Island with attention to ecological planning by analyzing physical and cultural characteristics of land features and biophysical vulnerabilities such as tidal inundation and coastal flooding. In this paper, we examine the impact of Hurricane Sandy focusing on land use due to unsustainable planning on Staten Island. We utilize McHarg's Staten Island land use suitability study as a comparative example of a sustainable planning. We address the questions (1) whether or not McHarg's study would have prevented damage to homes and other urban structures using empirical analysis and (2) whether McHarg's recommendations were a realistic possibility. We quantify these differences using geospatial methods and statistical analysis. Our results show that (1) a significantly lower percentage of urban damage would have occurred if land use development followed McHarg's guidelines and (2) how conflicting economic and social ideals of development and zoning issues could explain why McHarg's study would have been difficult to implement. Our findings illustrate the tradeoffs between economic development with long term environmental benefits. This emphasizes the need and opportunity to work with nature and employ urban sustainability approaches and ecological wisdom to mitigate future threats.

KW - Damage

KW - Development

KW - Hurricane Sandy

KW - Ian McHarg

KW - Land use suitability

KW - Urban sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979768765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979768765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.013

M3 - Article

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

ER -