Design-build project administration

Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Water utilities were traditionally required to deliver their projects using the design-bid-build (DBB) method. However, innovative and more efficient project delivery methods such as design-build (DB) are growing in use in this industry. The objective of this study is to benchmark DB project administration practices in the water industry, focusing on the U.S. Southwest/Pacific region. Structured interviews were conducted with four utilities that are experienced with successful DB delivery. One utility was selected to represent each of the four following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and Nevada. The interview questions were organized into eight different categories: procurement, roles and responsibilities, risk and quality assurance, design, design review, cost and schedule estimates, submittal and submittal review, and communication and information flow. Findings include that all four utilities engage the design-builder before 10% of design completion. This study supports utilities interested in using DB and in identifying practices to improve their DB project performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPipelines 2019
Subtitle of host publicationCondition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference
EditorsMark S. Mihm, Jeffrey W. Heidrick
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages468-476
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780784482490
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
EventPipelines 2019 Conference: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Nashville, United States
Duration: Jul 21 2019Jul 24 2019

Publication series

NamePipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference

Conference

ConferencePipelines 2019 Conference: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation
CountryUnited States
CityNashville
Period7/21/197/24/19

Fingerprint

Water
water
project
water industry
Quality assurance
Industry
communication
industry
Communication
cost
Costs
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Feghaly, J., El Asmar, M., & Ariaratnam, S. (2019). Design-build project administration: Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region. In M. S. Mihm, & J. W. Heidrick (Eds.), Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference (pp. 468-476). (Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482490.049

Design-build project administration : Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region. / Feghaly, Jeffrey; El Asmar, Mounir; Ariaratnam, Samuel.

Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference. ed. / Mark S. Mihm; Jeffrey W. Heidrick. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2019. p. 468-476 (Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Feghaly, J, El Asmar, M & Ariaratnam, S 2019, Design-build project administration: Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region. in MS Mihm & JW Heidrick (eds), Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference. Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 468-476, Pipelines 2019 Conference: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation, Nashville, United States, 7/21/19. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482490.049
Feghaly J, El Asmar M, Ariaratnam S. Design-build project administration: Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region. In Mihm MS, Heidrick JW, editors, Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2019. p. 468-476. (Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482490.049
Feghaly, Jeffrey ; El Asmar, Mounir ; Ariaratnam, Samuel. / Design-build project administration : Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region. Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference. editor / Mark S. Mihm ; Jeffrey W. Heidrick. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2019. pp. 468-476 (Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference).
@inproceedings{a7f6156f7fc240ecaed99c7ae0d1b581,
title = "Design-build project administration: Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region",
abstract = "Water utilities were traditionally required to deliver their projects using the design-bid-build (DBB) method. However, innovative and more efficient project delivery methods such as design-build (DB) are growing in use in this industry. The objective of this study is to benchmark DB project administration practices in the water industry, focusing on the U.S. Southwest/Pacific region. Structured interviews were conducted with four utilities that are experienced with successful DB delivery. One utility was selected to represent each of the four following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and Nevada. The interview questions were organized into eight different categories: procurement, roles and responsibilities, risk and quality assurance, design, design review, cost and schedule estimates, submittal and submittal review, and communication and information flow. Findings include that all four utilities engage the design-builder before 10{\%} of design completion. This study supports utilities interested in using DB and in identifying practices to improve their DB project performance.",
author = "Jeffrey Feghaly and {El Asmar}, Mounir and Samuel Ariaratnam",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/9780784482490.049",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
pages = "468--476",
editor = "Mihm, {Mark S.} and Heidrick, {Jeffrey W.}",
booktitle = "Pipelines 2019",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Design-build project administration

T2 - Case studies from water utilities in the U.S. Southwest/Pacific Region

AU - Feghaly, Jeffrey

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

AU - Ariaratnam, Samuel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Water utilities were traditionally required to deliver their projects using the design-bid-build (DBB) method. However, innovative and more efficient project delivery methods such as design-build (DB) are growing in use in this industry. The objective of this study is to benchmark DB project administration practices in the water industry, focusing on the U.S. Southwest/Pacific region. Structured interviews were conducted with four utilities that are experienced with successful DB delivery. One utility was selected to represent each of the four following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and Nevada. The interview questions were organized into eight different categories: procurement, roles and responsibilities, risk and quality assurance, design, design review, cost and schedule estimates, submittal and submittal review, and communication and information flow. Findings include that all four utilities engage the design-builder before 10% of design completion. This study supports utilities interested in using DB and in identifying practices to improve their DB project performance.

AB - Water utilities were traditionally required to deliver their projects using the design-bid-build (DBB) method. However, innovative and more efficient project delivery methods such as design-build (DB) are growing in use in this industry. The objective of this study is to benchmark DB project administration practices in the water industry, focusing on the U.S. Southwest/Pacific region. Structured interviews were conducted with four utilities that are experienced with successful DB delivery. One utility was selected to represent each of the four following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and Nevada. The interview questions were organized into eight different categories: procurement, roles and responsibilities, risk and quality assurance, design, design review, cost and schedule estimates, submittal and submittal review, and communication and information flow. Findings include that all four utilities engage the design-builder before 10% of design completion. This study supports utilities interested in using DB and in identifying practices to improve their DB project performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070374194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070374194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784482490.049

DO - 10.1061/9780784482490.049

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Pipelines 2019: Condition Assessment, Construction, and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2019 Conference

SP - 468

EP - 476

BT - Pipelines 2019

A2 - Mihm, Mark S.

A2 - Heidrick, Jeffrey W.

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -