Desert Research and Technology Studies (DRATS) 2010 science operations: Operational approaches and lessons learned for managing science during human planetary surface missions

Dean Eppler, Byron Adams, Doug Archer, Greg Baiden, Adrian Brown, William Carey, Barbara Cohen, Chris Condit, Cindy Evans, Corey Fortezzo, Brent Garry, Trevor Graff, John Gruener, Jennifer Heldmann, Kip Hodges, Friedrich Hörz, Jose Hurtado, Brian Hynek, Peter Isaacson, Catherine JuranekKurt Klaus, David Kring, Nina Lanza, Susan Lederer, Gary Lofgren, Margarita Marinova, Lisa May, Jonathan Meyer, Doug Ming, Brian Monteleone, Caroline Morisset, Sarah Noble, Elizabeth Rampe, James Rice, John Schutt, James Skinner, Carolyn M. Tewksbury-Christle, Barbara J. Tewksbury, Alicia Vaughan, Aileen Yingst, Kelsey Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Desert Research and Technology Studies (Desert RATS) is a multi-year series of hardware and operations tests carried out annually in the high desert of Arizona on the San Francisco Volcanic Field. These activities are designed to exercise planetary surface hardware and operations in conditions where long-distance, multi-day roving is achievable, and they allow NASA to evaluate different mission concepts and approaches in an environment less costly and more forgiving than space. The results from the RATS tests allow selection of potential operational approaches to planetary surface exploration prior to making commitments to specific flight and mission hardware development. In previous RATS operations, the Science Support Room has operated largely in an advisory role, an approach that was driven by the need to provide a loose science mission framework that would underpin the engineering tests. However, the extensive nature of the traverse operations for 2010 expanded the role of the science operations and tested specific operational approaches. Science mission operations approaches from the Apollo and Mars-Phoenix missions were merged to become the baseline for this test. Six days of traverse operations were conducted during each week of the 2-week test, with three traverse days each week conducted with voice and data communications continuously available, and three traverse days conducted with only two 1-hour communications periods per day. Within this framework, the team evaluated integrated science operations management using real-time, tactical science operations to oversee daily crew activities, and strategic level evaluations of science data and daily traverse results during a post-traverse planning shift. During continuous communications, both tactical and strategic teams were employed. On days when communications were reduced to only two communications periods per day, only a strategic team was employed. The Science Operations Team found that, if communications are good and down-linking of science data is ensured, high quality science returns is possible regardless of communications. What is absent from reduced communications is the scientific interaction between the crew on the planet and the scientists on the ground. These scientific interactions were a critical part of the science process and significantly improved mission science return over reduced communications conditions. The test also showed that the quality of science return is not measurable by simple numerical quantities but is, in fact, based on strongly non-quantifiable factors, such as the interactions between the crew and the Science Operations Teams. Although the metric evaluation data suggested some trends, there was not sufficient granularity in the data or specificity in the metrics to allow those trends to be understood on numerical data alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-241
Number of pages18
JournalActa Astronautica
Volume90
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Analog testing
  • Metric evaluation
  • Planetary science
  • Planetary surface operations
  • Science operations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Eppler, D., Adams, B., Archer, D., Baiden, G., Brown, A., Carey, W., Cohen, B., Condit, C., Evans, C., Fortezzo, C., Garry, B., Graff, T., Gruener, J., Heldmann, J., Hodges, K., Hörz, F., Hurtado, J., Hynek, B., Isaacson, P., ... Young, K. (2013). Desert Research and Technology Studies (DRATS) 2010 science operations: Operational approaches and lessons learned for managing science during human planetary surface missions. Acta Astronautica, 90(2), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.03.009