Deprivation and reward stimuli as compound stimuli

Elizabeth D. Capaldi, Frank Friedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Experiment 1 the experimental group was tested with a deprivation level and a reward magnitude which it had experienced previously but which it had not experienced in combination. This group was inferior in test performance to a group which had experienced the test deprivation-reward combination prior to test. These results were interpreted as indicating that deprivation stimuli and reward stimuli form a compound stimulus and training on the elements of the compound produces performance inferior to training directly on the compound. In Experiment 2, the decrement associated with two different shifts in deprivation and reward did not differ despite the different size change of total incentive involved in the two shifts. The results were interpreted as indicating that the deprivation-reward stimulus is not produced by a single underlying incentive mechanism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-30
Number of pages14
JournalLearning and Motivation
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1976
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reward
deprivation
reward
stimulus
Motivation
incentive
Group
experiment
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Deprivation and reward stimuli as compound stimuli. / Capaldi, Elizabeth D.; Friedman, Frank.

In: Learning and Motivation, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1976, p. 17-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Capaldi, Elizabeth D. ; Friedman, Frank. / Deprivation and reward stimuli as compound stimuli. In: Learning and Motivation. 1976 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 17-30.
@article{e7d7d2665a6e4f2c8cc306741020f0a4,
title = "Deprivation and reward stimuli as compound stimuli",
abstract = "In Experiment 1 the experimental group was tested with a deprivation level and a reward magnitude which it had experienced previously but which it had not experienced in combination. This group was inferior in test performance to a group which had experienced the test deprivation-reward combination prior to test. These results were interpreted as indicating that deprivation stimuli and reward stimuli form a compound stimulus and training on the elements of the compound produces performance inferior to training directly on the compound. In Experiment 2, the decrement associated with two different shifts in deprivation and reward did not differ despite the different size change of total incentive involved in the two shifts. The results were interpreted as indicating that the deprivation-reward stimulus is not produced by a single underlying incentive mechanism.",
author = "Capaldi, {Elizabeth D.} and Frank Friedman",
year = "1976",
doi = "10.1016/0023-9690(76)90015-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "17--30",
journal = "Learning and Motivation",
issn = "0023-9690",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deprivation and reward stimuli as compound stimuli

AU - Capaldi, Elizabeth D.

AU - Friedman, Frank

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - In Experiment 1 the experimental group was tested with a deprivation level and a reward magnitude which it had experienced previously but which it had not experienced in combination. This group was inferior in test performance to a group which had experienced the test deprivation-reward combination prior to test. These results were interpreted as indicating that deprivation stimuli and reward stimuli form a compound stimulus and training on the elements of the compound produces performance inferior to training directly on the compound. In Experiment 2, the decrement associated with two different shifts in deprivation and reward did not differ despite the different size change of total incentive involved in the two shifts. The results were interpreted as indicating that the deprivation-reward stimulus is not produced by a single underlying incentive mechanism.

AB - In Experiment 1 the experimental group was tested with a deprivation level and a reward magnitude which it had experienced previously but which it had not experienced in combination. This group was inferior in test performance to a group which had experienced the test deprivation-reward combination prior to test. These results were interpreted as indicating that deprivation stimuli and reward stimuli form a compound stimulus and training on the elements of the compound produces performance inferior to training directly on the compound. In Experiment 2, the decrement associated with two different shifts in deprivation and reward did not differ despite the different size change of total incentive involved in the two shifts. The results were interpreted as indicating that the deprivation-reward stimulus is not produced by a single underlying incentive mechanism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49549134368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49549134368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0023-9690(76)90015-1

DO - 10.1016/0023-9690(76)90015-1

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 17

EP - 30

JO - Learning and Motivation

JF - Learning and Motivation

SN - 0023-9690

IS - 1

ER -