Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability

Joseph A. Tainter, Deborah Strumsky, Temis G. Taylor, Michelle Arnold, Jose Lobo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Near the end of World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt asked Vannevar Bush, director of the wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development, to prepare a report on the post-war role of government in promoting science. In his famous report, Bush wrote: “Advances in science will … bring higher standards of living, will lead to the prevention or cure of diseases, will promote conservation of our limited national resources, and will assure means of defence against aggression” (Bush, 1945: 10). This statement, so characteristic of our faith in science, became the basis for the emphasis on innovation that we know today. It is a system that has brought material prosperity in the industrialized countries and high levels of employment. Innovation has fostered the complexity of modern societies. Bush’s statement reflects what is called technological optimism, a faith in technology to solve problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPhysical Limits to Economic Growth
Subtitle of host publicationPerspectives of Economic, Social, and Complexity Science
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages65-93
Number of pages29
ISBN (Electronic)9781315314952
ISBN (Print)9781138231603
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Depletion
Sustainability
Innovation
Faith
Prosperity
Standard of living
Resources
Conservation
Role of government
Aggression
Optimism
Second World War
Modernity
Developed countries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Tainter, J. A., Strumsky, D., Taylor, T. G., Arnold, M., & Lobo, J. (2017). Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability. In Physical Limits to Economic Growth: Perspectives of Economic, Social, and Complexity Science (pp. 65-93). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315314969_4

Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability. / Tainter, Joseph A.; Strumsky, Deborah; Taylor, Temis G.; Arnold, Michelle; Lobo, Jose.

Physical Limits to Economic Growth: Perspectives of Economic, Social, and Complexity Science. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 65-93.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Tainter, JA, Strumsky, D, Taylor, TG, Arnold, M & Lobo, J 2017, Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability. in Physical Limits to Economic Growth: Perspectives of Economic, Social, and Complexity Science. Taylor and Francis, pp. 65-93. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315314969_4
Tainter JA, Strumsky D, Taylor TG, Arnold M, Lobo J. Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability. In Physical Limits to Economic Growth: Perspectives of Economic, Social, and Complexity Science. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 65-93 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315314969_4
Tainter, Joseph A. ; Strumsky, Deborah ; Taylor, Temis G. ; Arnold, Michelle ; Lobo, Jose. / Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability. Physical Limits to Economic Growth: Perspectives of Economic, Social, and Complexity Science. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 65-93
@inbook{136e20e751a44686abede4b89129b692,
title = "Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability",
abstract = "Near the end of World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt asked Vannevar Bush, director of the wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development, to prepare a report on the post-war role of government in promoting science. In his famous report, Bush wrote: “Advances in science will … bring higher standards of living, will lead to the prevention or cure of diseases, will promote conservation of our limited national resources, and will assure means of defence against aggression” (Bush, 1945: 10). This statement, so characteristic of our faith in science, became the basis for the emphasis on innovation that we know today. It is a system that has brought material prosperity in the industrialized countries and high levels of employment. Innovation has fostered the complexity of modern societies. Bush’s statement reflects what is called technological optimism, a faith in technology to solve problems.",
author = "Tainter, {Joseph A.} and Deborah Strumsky and Taylor, {Temis G.} and Michelle Arnold and Jose Lobo",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315314969_4",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138231603",
pages = "65--93",
booktitle = "Physical Limits to Economic Growth",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Depletion vs. innovation the fundamental question of sustainability

AU - Tainter, Joseph A.

AU - Strumsky, Deborah

AU - Taylor, Temis G.

AU - Arnold, Michelle

AU - Lobo, Jose

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Near the end of World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt asked Vannevar Bush, director of the wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development, to prepare a report on the post-war role of government in promoting science. In his famous report, Bush wrote: “Advances in science will … bring higher standards of living, will lead to the prevention or cure of diseases, will promote conservation of our limited national resources, and will assure means of defence against aggression” (Bush, 1945: 10). This statement, so characteristic of our faith in science, became the basis for the emphasis on innovation that we know today. It is a system that has brought material prosperity in the industrialized countries and high levels of employment. Innovation has fostered the complexity of modern societies. Bush’s statement reflects what is called technological optimism, a faith in technology to solve problems.

AB - Near the end of World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt asked Vannevar Bush, director of the wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development, to prepare a report on the post-war role of government in promoting science. In his famous report, Bush wrote: “Advances in science will … bring higher standards of living, will lead to the prevention or cure of diseases, will promote conservation of our limited national resources, and will assure means of defence against aggression” (Bush, 1945: 10). This statement, so characteristic of our faith in science, became the basis for the emphasis on innovation that we know today. It is a system that has brought material prosperity in the industrialized countries and high levels of employment. Innovation has fostered the complexity of modern societies. Bush’s statement reflects what is called technological optimism, a faith in technology to solve problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045050094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045050094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315314969_4

DO - 10.4324/9781315314969_4

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85045050094

SN - 9781138231603

SP - 65

EP - 93

BT - Physical Limits to Economic Growth

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -