Delayed memory for visual-haptic exploration of familiar objects

Allison E C Pensky, Kathryn Johnson, Susan Haag, Donald Homa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Long-term memory of haptic, visual, and cross-modality information was investigated. In Experiment 1, subjects briefly explored 40 commonplace objects visually or haptically and then received a recognition test with categorically similar foils in the same or the alternative modality both immediately and after 1 week. Recognition was best for visual input and test, with haptic memory still apparent after a week's delay. Recognition was poorest in the cross-modality conditions, with performance on the haptic-visual and visual-haptic cross-modal conditions being nearly identical. Visual and haptic information decayed at similar rates across a week delay. In Experiment 2, subjects simultaneously viewed and handled the same objects, and transfer was tested in a successive cue-modality paradigm. Performance with the visual modality again exceeded that with the haptic modality. Furthermore, initial errors on the haptic test were often corrected when followed by the visual presentation, both immediately and after 1 week. However, visual test errors were corrected by haptic cuing on the immediate test only. These results are discussed in terms of shared information between the haptic and visual modalities, and the ease of transfer between these modalities immediately and after a substantial delay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)574-580
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Repression (Psychology)
Long-Term Memory
Cues
Recognition (Psychology)
Haptics
Modality
Transfer (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Delayed memory for visual-haptic exploration of familiar objects. / Pensky, Allison E C; Johnson, Kathryn; Haag, Susan; Homa, Donald.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 574-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5dc34b2e2bf47138cf103c50067e06b,
title = "Delayed memory for visual-haptic exploration of familiar objects",
abstract = "Long-term memory of haptic, visual, and cross-modality information was investigated. In Experiment 1, subjects briefly explored 40 commonplace objects visually or haptically and then received a recognition test with categorically similar foils in the same or the alternative modality both immediately and after 1 week. Recognition was best for visual input and test, with haptic memory still apparent after a week's delay. Recognition was poorest in the cross-modality conditions, with performance on the haptic-visual and visual-haptic cross-modal conditions being nearly identical. Visual and haptic information decayed at similar rates across a week delay. In Experiment 2, subjects simultaneously viewed and handled the same objects, and transfer was tested in a successive cue-modality paradigm. Performance with the visual modality again exceeded that with the haptic modality. Furthermore, initial errors on the haptic test were often corrected when followed by the visual presentation, both immediately and after 1 week. However, visual test errors were corrected by haptic cuing on the immediate test only. These results are discussed in terms of shared information between the haptic and visual modalities, and the ease of transfer between these modalities immediately and after a substantial delay.",
author = "Pensky, {Allison E C} and Kathryn Johnson and Susan Haag and Donald Homa",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3758/PBR.15.3.574",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "574--580",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delayed memory for visual-haptic exploration of familiar objects

AU - Pensky, Allison E C

AU - Johnson, Kathryn

AU - Haag, Susan

AU - Homa, Donald

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Long-term memory of haptic, visual, and cross-modality information was investigated. In Experiment 1, subjects briefly explored 40 commonplace objects visually or haptically and then received a recognition test with categorically similar foils in the same or the alternative modality both immediately and after 1 week. Recognition was best for visual input and test, with haptic memory still apparent after a week's delay. Recognition was poorest in the cross-modality conditions, with performance on the haptic-visual and visual-haptic cross-modal conditions being nearly identical. Visual and haptic information decayed at similar rates across a week delay. In Experiment 2, subjects simultaneously viewed and handled the same objects, and transfer was tested in a successive cue-modality paradigm. Performance with the visual modality again exceeded that with the haptic modality. Furthermore, initial errors on the haptic test were often corrected when followed by the visual presentation, both immediately and after 1 week. However, visual test errors were corrected by haptic cuing on the immediate test only. These results are discussed in terms of shared information between the haptic and visual modalities, and the ease of transfer between these modalities immediately and after a substantial delay.

AB - Long-term memory of haptic, visual, and cross-modality information was investigated. In Experiment 1, subjects briefly explored 40 commonplace objects visually or haptically and then received a recognition test with categorically similar foils in the same or the alternative modality both immediately and after 1 week. Recognition was best for visual input and test, with haptic memory still apparent after a week's delay. Recognition was poorest in the cross-modality conditions, with performance on the haptic-visual and visual-haptic cross-modal conditions being nearly identical. Visual and haptic information decayed at similar rates across a week delay. In Experiment 2, subjects simultaneously viewed and handled the same objects, and transfer was tested in a successive cue-modality paradigm. Performance with the visual modality again exceeded that with the haptic modality. Furthermore, initial errors on the haptic test were often corrected when followed by the visual presentation, both immediately and after 1 week. However, visual test errors were corrected by haptic cuing on the immediate test only. These results are discussed in terms of shared information between the haptic and visual modalities, and the ease of transfer between these modalities immediately and after a substantial delay.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50949110487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50949110487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.15.3.574

DO - 10.3758/PBR.15.3.574

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 574

EP - 580

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 3

ER -