TY - JOUR
T1 - Degradation of Monocrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Modules from a 10-Year-Old Rooftop System in Florida
AU - Colvin, Dylan J.
AU - Iqbal, Nafis
AU - Yerger, Julian H.
AU - Li, Fang
AU - Sinha, Archana
AU - Vicnansky, Galya
AU - Brummer, Gabriele
AU - Zheng, Nancy
AU - Schneller, Eric J.
AU - Barkaszi, James
AU - Tamizhmani, Govindasamy
AU - Davis, Kristopher O.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Department of Energy's Solar Energy Technologies Office under Grant DE-EE0008155 and Grant DEEE0009347.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2011-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - A system of 180 monocrystalline aluminum back-surface field modules were installed in Cocoa, Florida, for 10 years. In total, 156 modules are characterized and compared to 3 controls. Power degradation rates vary between-0.14% to-3.22% per year, with median and average rates of-0.92% and-1.05% per year, respectively. The losses are primarily resistive with minor optical and recombination loss contributions. Electroluminescence imaging shows a characteristic pattern, which is shown to be resistive in nature when compared to photoluminescence. Resistive losses are due to corrosion of the rear contact Ag/solder interface and, to a much lesser degree, gridline Ag oxidation. Moisture ingress through the backsheet is likely responsible for mediating corrosion. Optical losses are due mostly to a combination of antireflection coating degradation, minor encapsulant browning, and delamination. Minor front contact corrosion may contribute to recombination. This study expands upon previous work on this vintage of the module by examining a large sample set, comprehensive characterization including techniques not previously used on these modules, and a comparison between two other systems of different climates.
AB - A system of 180 monocrystalline aluminum back-surface field modules were installed in Cocoa, Florida, for 10 years. In total, 156 modules are characterized and compared to 3 controls. Power degradation rates vary between-0.14% to-3.22% per year, with median and average rates of-0.92% and-1.05% per year, respectively. The losses are primarily resistive with minor optical and recombination loss contributions. Electroluminescence imaging shows a characteristic pattern, which is shown to be resistive in nature when compared to photoluminescence. Resistive losses are due to corrosion of the rear contact Ag/solder interface and, to a much lesser degree, gridline Ag oxidation. Moisture ingress through the backsheet is likely responsible for mediating corrosion. Optical losses are due mostly to a combination of antireflection coating degradation, minor encapsulant browning, and delamination. Minor front contact corrosion may contribute to recombination. This study expands upon previous work on this vintage of the module by examining a large sample set, comprehensive characterization including techniques not previously used on these modules, and a comparison between two other systems of different climates.
KW - Aluminum back-surface field (Al-BSF)
KW - degradation
KW - electroluminescence imaging
KW - field study
KW - rear contact
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148435253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148435253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3238278
DO - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3238278
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148435253
SN - 2156-3381
VL - 13
SP - 275
EP - 282
JO - IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
JF - IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
IS - 2
ER -