Defining University Anchor Institution Strategies: Comparing Theory to Practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since the 1990s, some urban universities have served as neighborhood anchors with an interest in revitalization. Current theory suggests anchors adopt ‘shared value’ approaches, leveraging resources for mutually beneficial improvement in the community. This study explores assumptions in contemporary anchor frameworks and uses a survey to examine how 22 U.S. universities approach their roles as anchor institutions. The study finds that the universities tend to prioritize place-based initiatives, while contemporary frameworks are more normative and highlight socioeconomic practices. Based on reported strategies, the author proposes an alternate typology that accounts for the ways universities most commonly describe anchor approaches, complementing contemporary theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalPlanning Theory and Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 7 2017

Keywords

  • anchor institution
  • theory-practice gap
  • university anchor revitalization
  • University-community engagement
  • urban revitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Defining University Anchor Institution Strategies: Comparing Theory to Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this