Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety

Patrick Waterson, Michelle M. Robertson, Nancy Cooke, Laura Militello, Emilie Roth, Neville A. Stanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work.

An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-599
Number of pages35
JournalErgonomics
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2015

Fingerprint

sociotechnical system
System theory
Safety
Systems Theory
system theory
science
Ergonomics
Human engineering
Workplace
workplace
coverage
evaluation
development of methods
Aptitude
Human Engineering
ergonomics
rating
ability
interaction

Keywords

  • human factors and ergonomics methods
  • macroergonomics
  • sociotechnical systems
  • workplace design and evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety. / Waterson, Patrick; Robertson, Michelle M.; Cooke, Nancy; Militello, Laura; Roth, Emilie; Stanton, Neville A.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 58, No. 4, 03.04.2015, p. 565-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waterson, Patrick ; Robertson, Michelle M. ; Cooke, Nancy ; Militello, Laura ; Roth, Emilie ; Stanton, Neville A. / Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety. In: Ergonomics. 2015 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 565-599.
@article{b9376e44c97b4d6bbe48c91f663ae5e6,
title = "Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety",
abstract = "Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work.An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these.",
keywords = "human factors and ergonomics methods, macroergonomics, sociotechnical systems, workplace design and evaluation",
author = "Patrick Waterson and Robertson, {Michelle M.} and Nancy Cooke and Laura Militello and Emilie Roth and Stanton, {Neville A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "565--599",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety

AU - Waterson, Patrick

AU - Robertson, Michelle M.

AU - Cooke, Nancy

AU - Militello, Laura

AU - Roth, Emilie

AU - Stanton, Neville A.

PY - 2015/4/3

Y1 - 2015/4/3

N2 - Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work.An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these.

AB - Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work.An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these.

KW - human factors and ergonomics methods

KW - macroergonomics

KW - sociotechnical systems

KW - workplace design and evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928594661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928594661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622

DO - 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622

M3 - Article

C2 - 25832121

AN - SCOPUS:84928594661

VL - 58

SP - 565

EP - 599

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 4

ER -