Defining sentence type

Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable

Michael P. Harrington, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of legal and extralegal factors on felony sentence outcomes has been widely studied, typically using a total incarceration variable that defines sentence outcomes as incarceration or probation. Research conducted by Holleran and Spohn has called this into question, revealing that factors that affected jail sentences were different than those that affected prison sentences and demonstrating that the conclusions one would draw regarding the influence of extralegal offender characteristics such as race and ethnicity differ depending on the way in which sentence was defined. The authors replicate and extend the research conducted by Holleran and Spohn, using several operational definitions of the decision to incarcerate or not, focusing on sentence outcomes for offenders convicted of felonies in a jurisdiction with an indeterminate sentencing system. Results provide compelling evidence in support of Holleran and Spohn.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-63
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Prisons
Research

Keywords

  • Jail
  • Prison
  • Sentencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Defining sentence type : Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. / Harrington, Michael P.; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 44, No. 1, 02.2007, p. 36-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{920dcd642c7d4a2fadde57821e22a874,
title = "Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable",
abstract = "The effect of legal and extralegal factors on felony sentence outcomes has been widely studied, typically using a total incarceration variable that defines sentence outcomes as incarceration or probation. Research conducted by Holleran and Spohn has called this into question, revealing that factors that affected jail sentences were different than those that affected prison sentences and demonstrating that the conclusions one would draw regarding the influence of extralegal offender characteristics such as race and ethnicity differ depending on the way in which sentence was defined. The authors replicate and extend the research conducted by Holleran and Spohn, using several operational definitions of the decision to incarcerate or not, focusing on sentence outcomes for offenders convicted of felonies in a jurisdiction with an indeterminate sentencing system. Results provide compelling evidence in support of Holleran and Spohn.",
keywords = "Jail, Prison, Sentencing",
author = "Harrington, {Michael P.} and Cassia Spohn",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0022427806295001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "36--63",
journal = "Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0022-4278",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining sentence type

T2 - Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable

AU - Harrington, Michael P.

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - The effect of legal and extralegal factors on felony sentence outcomes has been widely studied, typically using a total incarceration variable that defines sentence outcomes as incarceration or probation. Research conducted by Holleran and Spohn has called this into question, revealing that factors that affected jail sentences were different than those that affected prison sentences and demonstrating that the conclusions one would draw regarding the influence of extralegal offender characteristics such as race and ethnicity differ depending on the way in which sentence was defined. The authors replicate and extend the research conducted by Holleran and Spohn, using several operational definitions of the decision to incarcerate or not, focusing on sentence outcomes for offenders convicted of felonies in a jurisdiction with an indeterminate sentencing system. Results provide compelling evidence in support of Holleran and Spohn.

AB - The effect of legal and extralegal factors on felony sentence outcomes has been widely studied, typically using a total incarceration variable that defines sentence outcomes as incarceration or probation. Research conducted by Holleran and Spohn has called this into question, revealing that factors that affected jail sentences were different than those that affected prison sentences and demonstrating that the conclusions one would draw regarding the influence of extralegal offender characteristics such as race and ethnicity differ depending on the way in which sentence was defined. The authors replicate and extend the research conducted by Holleran and Spohn, using several operational definitions of the decision to incarcerate or not, focusing on sentence outcomes for offenders convicted of felonies in a jurisdiction with an indeterminate sentencing system. Results provide compelling evidence in support of Holleran and Spohn.

KW - Jail

KW - Prison

KW - Sentencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845967477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845967477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022427806295001

DO - 10.1177/0022427806295001

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 36

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

JF - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0022-4278

IS - 1

ER -