Deficiencies and challenges in the study of ancient tuberculosis DNA

Alicia K. Wilbur, Abigail S. Bouwman, Anne Stone, Charlotte A. Roberts, Luz Andrea Pfister, Jane Buikstra, Terence A. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explore the standards of research and reporting needed to justify the destructive analysis of archaeological human bone for biomolecular studies of ancient tuberculosis (TB). Acceptable standards in osteological interpretation have been met in some biomolecular papers, but there are also cases where insufficient care has been taken in distinguishing between pathognomonic lesions and those that are 'consistent with' a diagnosis of TB. Some biomolecular studies have failed to recognize that archaeological bones might be contaminated with environmental mycobacteria whose DNA could give rise to false positives in polymerase chain reactions directed at members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The difficulties of applying spoligotyping to ancient DNA have also been underestimated and conclusions drawn from such analyses are often weakly supported. Assumptions that mycobacterial DNA preserves better than human DNA, and that contamination with modern DNA is less of a problem, has led in some cases to a laxity in research standards with insufficient attention paid to the need to authenticate ancient DNA results. We illustrate our concerns by reference to a recent paper reporting biomolecular detection of ancient TB DNA in skeletons from the eastern Mediterranean Neolithic settlement of Atlit-Yam. We are unconvinced that the skeletal evidence presented in this paper gives sufficient indication of TB to warrant destructive analysis, and we are concerned that during the biomolecular part of the project inadequate attention was paid to the possibility that results might be due to laboratory cross-contamination or to amplification of environmental mycobacterial DNA present in the bones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1990-1997
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume36
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

contagious disease
environmental pollution
indication
Tuberculosis
interpretation
present
evidence
Contamination
Ancient DNA

Keywords

  • Ancient DNA
  • Biomolecular archaeology
  • Paleopathology
  • Polymerase chain reaction
  • Spoligotyping
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Deficiencies and challenges in the study of ancient tuberculosis DNA. / Wilbur, Alicia K.; Bouwman, Abigail S.; Stone, Anne; Roberts, Charlotte A.; Pfister, Luz Andrea; Buikstra, Jane; Brown, Terence A.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 36, No. 9, 09.2009, p. 1990-1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilbur, Alicia K. ; Bouwman, Abigail S. ; Stone, Anne ; Roberts, Charlotte A. ; Pfister, Luz Andrea ; Buikstra, Jane ; Brown, Terence A. / Deficiencies and challenges in the study of ancient tuberculosis DNA. In: Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 9. pp. 1990-1997.
@article{6f1ae22a28fa4be09153b3c16b18d1d4,
title = "Deficiencies and challenges in the study of ancient tuberculosis DNA",
abstract = "We explore the standards of research and reporting needed to justify the destructive analysis of archaeological human bone for biomolecular studies of ancient tuberculosis (TB). Acceptable standards in osteological interpretation have been met in some biomolecular papers, but there are also cases where insufficient care has been taken in distinguishing between pathognomonic lesions and those that are 'consistent with' a diagnosis of TB. Some biomolecular studies have failed to recognize that archaeological bones might be contaminated with environmental mycobacteria whose DNA could give rise to false positives in polymerase chain reactions directed at members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The difficulties of applying spoligotyping to ancient DNA have also been underestimated and conclusions drawn from such analyses are often weakly supported. Assumptions that mycobacterial DNA preserves better than human DNA, and that contamination with modern DNA is less of a problem, has led in some cases to a laxity in research standards with insufficient attention paid to the need to authenticate ancient DNA results. We illustrate our concerns by reference to a recent paper reporting biomolecular detection of ancient TB DNA in skeletons from the eastern Mediterranean Neolithic settlement of Atlit-Yam. We are unconvinced that the skeletal evidence presented in this paper gives sufficient indication of TB to warrant destructive analysis, and we are concerned that during the biomolecular part of the project inadequate attention was paid to the possibility that results might be due to laboratory cross-contamination or to amplification of environmental mycobacterial DNA present in the bones.",
keywords = "Ancient DNA, Biomolecular archaeology, Paleopathology, Polymerase chain reaction, Spoligotyping, Tuberculosis",
author = "Wilbur, {Alicia K.} and Bouwman, {Abigail S.} and Anne Stone and Roberts, {Charlotte A.} and Pfister, {Luz Andrea} and Jane Buikstra and Brown, {Terence A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1990--1997",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
issn = "0305-4403",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deficiencies and challenges in the study of ancient tuberculosis DNA

AU - Wilbur, Alicia K.

AU - Bouwman, Abigail S.

AU - Stone, Anne

AU - Roberts, Charlotte A.

AU - Pfister, Luz Andrea

AU - Buikstra, Jane

AU - Brown, Terence A.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - We explore the standards of research and reporting needed to justify the destructive analysis of archaeological human bone for biomolecular studies of ancient tuberculosis (TB). Acceptable standards in osteological interpretation have been met in some biomolecular papers, but there are also cases where insufficient care has been taken in distinguishing between pathognomonic lesions and those that are 'consistent with' a diagnosis of TB. Some biomolecular studies have failed to recognize that archaeological bones might be contaminated with environmental mycobacteria whose DNA could give rise to false positives in polymerase chain reactions directed at members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The difficulties of applying spoligotyping to ancient DNA have also been underestimated and conclusions drawn from such analyses are often weakly supported. Assumptions that mycobacterial DNA preserves better than human DNA, and that contamination with modern DNA is less of a problem, has led in some cases to a laxity in research standards with insufficient attention paid to the need to authenticate ancient DNA results. We illustrate our concerns by reference to a recent paper reporting biomolecular detection of ancient TB DNA in skeletons from the eastern Mediterranean Neolithic settlement of Atlit-Yam. We are unconvinced that the skeletal evidence presented in this paper gives sufficient indication of TB to warrant destructive analysis, and we are concerned that during the biomolecular part of the project inadequate attention was paid to the possibility that results might be due to laboratory cross-contamination or to amplification of environmental mycobacterial DNA present in the bones.

AB - We explore the standards of research and reporting needed to justify the destructive analysis of archaeological human bone for biomolecular studies of ancient tuberculosis (TB). Acceptable standards in osteological interpretation have been met in some biomolecular papers, but there are also cases where insufficient care has been taken in distinguishing between pathognomonic lesions and those that are 'consistent with' a diagnosis of TB. Some biomolecular studies have failed to recognize that archaeological bones might be contaminated with environmental mycobacteria whose DNA could give rise to false positives in polymerase chain reactions directed at members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The difficulties of applying spoligotyping to ancient DNA have also been underestimated and conclusions drawn from such analyses are often weakly supported. Assumptions that mycobacterial DNA preserves better than human DNA, and that contamination with modern DNA is less of a problem, has led in some cases to a laxity in research standards with insufficient attention paid to the need to authenticate ancient DNA results. We illustrate our concerns by reference to a recent paper reporting biomolecular detection of ancient TB DNA in skeletons from the eastern Mediterranean Neolithic settlement of Atlit-Yam. We are unconvinced that the skeletal evidence presented in this paper gives sufficient indication of TB to warrant destructive analysis, and we are concerned that during the biomolecular part of the project inadequate attention was paid to the possibility that results might be due to laboratory cross-contamination or to amplification of environmental mycobacterial DNA present in the bones.

KW - Ancient DNA

KW - Biomolecular archaeology

KW - Paleopathology

KW - Polymerase chain reaction

KW - Spoligotyping

KW - Tuberculosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649616557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649616557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67649616557

VL - 36

SP - 1990

EP - 1997

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

SN - 0305-4403

IS - 9

ER -