Defensive Behavior in Organizations: A Preliminary Model

Blake Ashforth, Raymond T. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

142 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature on organizational politics has focused on the proactive promotion of self-interests but has neglected the reactive defense of self-interests. Defensive behaviors are argued to: (1) avoid action, via over-conforming, passing the buck, playing dumb, depersonalizing, smoothing and stretching, and stalling, (2) avoid blame via buffing, playing safe, justifying, scapegoating, misrepresenting, and escalating commitment, and (3) avoid change via resisting change and protecting turf. Organizational antecedents of defensiveness include bureaucratic rationality and various stressors, and individual antecedents include insecurity and anxiety, emotional exhaustion, work alienation, self-monitoring, and low self-efficacy. The effects of defensiveness on the individual, recipients, and organization are discussed, and directions for future research are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-648
Number of pages28
JournalHuman Relations
Volume43
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Buffing
Stretching
Monitoring
burnout
alienation
rationality
self-efficacy
promotion
recipient
commitment
monitoring
anxiety
organization
politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Defensive Behavior in Organizations : A Preliminary Model. / Ashforth, Blake; Lee, Raymond T.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 7, 1990, p. 621-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashforth, Blake ; Lee, Raymond T. / Defensive Behavior in Organizations : A Preliminary Model. In: Human Relations. 1990 ; Vol. 43, No. 7. pp. 621-648.
@article{85ffa7e941644e70846a3fbaaca59739,
title = "Defensive Behavior in Organizations: A Preliminary Model",
abstract = "The literature on organizational politics has focused on the proactive promotion of self-interests but has neglected the reactive defense of self-interests. Defensive behaviors are argued to: (1) avoid action, via over-conforming, passing the buck, playing dumb, depersonalizing, smoothing and stretching, and stalling, (2) avoid blame via buffing, playing safe, justifying, scapegoating, misrepresenting, and escalating commitment, and (3) avoid change via resisting change and protecting turf. Organizational antecedents of defensiveness include bureaucratic rationality and various stressors, and individual antecedents include insecurity and anxiety, emotional exhaustion, work alienation, self-monitoring, and low self-efficacy. The effects of defensiveness on the individual, recipients, and organization are discussed, and directions for future research are presented.",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Lee, {Raymond T.}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1177/001872679004300702",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "621--648",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defensive Behavior in Organizations

T2 - A Preliminary Model

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Lee, Raymond T.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The literature on organizational politics has focused on the proactive promotion of self-interests but has neglected the reactive defense of self-interests. Defensive behaviors are argued to: (1) avoid action, via over-conforming, passing the buck, playing dumb, depersonalizing, smoothing and stretching, and stalling, (2) avoid blame via buffing, playing safe, justifying, scapegoating, misrepresenting, and escalating commitment, and (3) avoid change via resisting change and protecting turf. Organizational antecedents of defensiveness include bureaucratic rationality and various stressors, and individual antecedents include insecurity and anxiety, emotional exhaustion, work alienation, self-monitoring, and low self-efficacy. The effects of defensiveness on the individual, recipients, and organization are discussed, and directions for future research are presented.

AB - The literature on organizational politics has focused on the proactive promotion of self-interests but has neglected the reactive defense of self-interests. Defensive behaviors are argued to: (1) avoid action, via over-conforming, passing the buck, playing dumb, depersonalizing, smoothing and stretching, and stalling, (2) avoid blame via buffing, playing safe, justifying, scapegoating, misrepresenting, and escalating commitment, and (3) avoid change via resisting change and protecting turf. Organizational antecedents of defensiveness include bureaucratic rationality and various stressors, and individual antecedents include insecurity and anxiety, emotional exhaustion, work alienation, self-monitoring, and low self-efficacy. The effects of defensiveness on the individual, recipients, and organization are discussed, and directions for future research are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973818379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973818379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872679004300702

DO - 10.1177/001872679004300702

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973818379

VL - 43

SP - 621

EP - 648

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 7

ER -