Abstract

The development of nuclear power is based on a faith which the public places in technology to solve all problems. Decommissioning of nuclear power plants will be the next leap the public is asked to make. This article uses evidence from the Sizewell Inquiry to identify generic and geosocial decommissioning uncertainties and discusses them within a policy and research framework. Six conclusions are advanced: social uncertainties will not be resolved within a technical context alone; decommissioning costs are underestimated; most decommissioning decisions must be made on a case-by-case, not generic, basis; decommissioning should be included routinely in local land planning decisions; further nuclear development should await decommissioning experience; and decommissioning should be included in all future nuclear policy decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-61
Number of pages17
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

nuclear power
decommissioning
faith
uncertainty
power plants
nuclear policy
nuclear power plant
planning
costs
evidence
experience
cost
decision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Decommissioning at ground level. Sizewell and the uncertainties of faith. / Pasqualetti, Martin.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1988, p. 45-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c096d89c9d84635bdd179de067fc4ec,
title = "Decommissioning at ground level. Sizewell and the uncertainties of faith",
abstract = "The development of nuclear power is based on a faith which the public places in technology to solve all problems. Decommissioning of nuclear power plants will be the next leap the public is asked to make. This article uses evidence from the Sizewell Inquiry to identify generic and geosocial decommissioning uncertainties and discusses them within a policy and research framework. Six conclusions are advanced: social uncertainties will not be resolved within a technical context alone; decommissioning costs are underestimated; most decommissioning decisions must be made on a case-by-case, not generic, basis; decommissioning should be included routinely in local land planning decisions; further nuclear development should await decommissioning experience; and decommissioning should be included in all future nuclear policy decisions.",
author = "Martin Pasqualetti",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/0264-8377(88)90006-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "45--61",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decommissioning at ground level. Sizewell and the uncertainties of faith

AU - Pasqualetti, Martin

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - The development of nuclear power is based on a faith which the public places in technology to solve all problems. Decommissioning of nuclear power plants will be the next leap the public is asked to make. This article uses evidence from the Sizewell Inquiry to identify generic and geosocial decommissioning uncertainties and discusses them within a policy and research framework. Six conclusions are advanced: social uncertainties will not be resolved within a technical context alone; decommissioning costs are underestimated; most decommissioning decisions must be made on a case-by-case, not generic, basis; decommissioning should be included routinely in local land planning decisions; further nuclear development should await decommissioning experience; and decommissioning should be included in all future nuclear policy decisions.

AB - The development of nuclear power is based on a faith which the public places in technology to solve all problems. Decommissioning of nuclear power plants will be the next leap the public is asked to make. This article uses evidence from the Sizewell Inquiry to identify generic and geosocial decommissioning uncertainties and discusses them within a policy and research framework. Six conclusions are advanced: social uncertainties will not be resolved within a technical context alone; decommissioning costs are underestimated; most decommissioning decisions must be made on a case-by-case, not generic, basis; decommissioning should be included routinely in local land planning decisions; further nuclear development should await decommissioning experience; and decommissioning should be included in all future nuclear policy decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023812246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023812246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0264-8377(88)90006-3

DO - 10.1016/0264-8377(88)90006-3

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 45

EP - 61

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

IS - 1

ER -