Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults

Christopher S. Walter, Caitlin R. Hengge, Bergen E. Lindauer, Sydney Schaefer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Age-related declines in function can limit older adults’ independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. Methods: Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of a functional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. Results: No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. Discussion and conclusions: Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-19
Number of pages6
JournalExperimental Gerontology
Volume116
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Activities of Daily Living
Geriatrics
Linear regression
Regression analysis
Patient rehabilitation
Transfer (Psychology)
Independent Living
Aging of materials
Motor Skills
Linear Models
Rehabilitation
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living (ADLs)
  • Aging
  • Functional training
  • Generalization
  • Motor learning
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Aging
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Endocrinology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults. / Walter, Christopher S.; Hengge, Caitlin R.; Lindauer, Bergen E.; Schaefer, Sydney.

In: Experimental Gerontology, Vol. 116, 01.02.2019, p. 14-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walter, Christopher S. ; Hengge, Caitlin R. ; Lindauer, Bergen E. ; Schaefer, Sydney. / Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults. In: Experimental Gerontology. 2019 ; Vol. 116. pp. 14-19.
@article{5a40a0b7b9934f288e842fe8b541c7ee,
title = "Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults",
abstract = "Background: Age-related declines in function can limit older adults’ independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. Methods: Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of a functional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. Results: No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. Discussion and conclusions: Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.",
keywords = "Activities of daily living (ADLs), Aging, Functional training, Generalization, Motor learning, Rehabilitation",
author = "Walter, {Christopher S.} and Hengge, {Caitlin R.} and Lindauer, {Bergen E.} and Sydney Schaefer",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.exger.2018.12.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "14--19",
journal = "Experimental Gerontology",
issn = "0531-5565",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults

AU - Walter, Christopher S.

AU - Hengge, Caitlin R.

AU - Lindauer, Bergen E.

AU - Schaefer, Sydney

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background: Age-related declines in function can limit older adults’ independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. Methods: Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of a functional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. Results: No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. Discussion and conclusions: Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.

AB - Background: Age-related declines in function can limit older adults’ independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. Methods: Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of a functional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. Results: No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. Discussion and conclusions: Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.

KW - Activities of daily living (ADLs)

KW - Aging

KW - Functional training

KW - Generalization

KW - Motor learning

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058500854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058500854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.exger.2018.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.exger.2018.12.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 30562555

AN - SCOPUS:85058500854

VL - 116

SP - 14

EP - 19

JO - Experimental Gerontology

JF - Experimental Gerontology

SN - 0531-5565

ER -