Decisions in Research Review Boards

The Roles of Individual Characteristics and Communication Medium

Yushim Kim, Deirdre Hahn, David Coursey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines how individual characteristics and choice of communication medium influence the acceptance of research proposals by institutional review boards. Lab experiments were used to assess subject decisions in simulated review board processes regarding four mock research proposals. Results indicate that participants were less likely to approve risky scientific research proposals than those with lower risk and fewer ethical issues, but still the evaluations varied. Females had less likelihood of approving risky scientific research with ethical concerns. When demographic characteristics were controlled, the visual presentation of proposals increased the odds that participants would approve high-risk scientific research. This study contributes to the review board reform debate by empirically examining how personal characteristics and communication medium influence board members' reviews of proposals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-192
Number of pages20
JournalPublic Integrity
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

communication medium
acceptance
Communication media
Individual characteristics
Communication Media
reform
experiment
evaluation

Keywords

  • communication medium
  • decision-making
  • institutional review boards
  • institutionalized ethics
  • risk
  • scientific research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law
  • Public Administration
  • Business and International Management
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Decisions in Research Review Boards : The Roles of Individual Characteristics and Communication Medium. / Kim, Yushim; Hahn, Deirdre; Coursey, David.

In: Public Integrity, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 173-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cda7165f9f114cabb1bc2505e787cb77,
title = "Decisions in Research Review Boards: The Roles of Individual Characteristics and Communication Medium",
abstract = "This article examines how individual characteristics and choice of communication medium influence the acceptance of research proposals by institutional review boards. Lab experiments were used to assess subject decisions in simulated review board processes regarding four mock research proposals. Results indicate that participants were less likely to approve risky scientific research proposals than those with lower risk and fewer ethical issues, but still the evaluations varied. Females had less likelihood of approving risky scientific research with ethical concerns. When demographic characteristics were controlled, the visual presentation of proposals increased the odds that participants would approve high-risk scientific research. This study contributes to the review board reform debate by empirically examining how personal characteristics and communication medium influence board members' reviews of proposals.",
keywords = "communication medium, decision-making, institutional review boards, institutionalized ethics, risk, scientific research",
author = "Yushim Kim and Deirdre Hahn and David Coursey",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2753/PIN1099-9922140204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "173--192",
journal = "Public Integrity",
issn = "1099-9922",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decisions in Research Review Boards

T2 - The Roles of Individual Characteristics and Communication Medium

AU - Kim, Yushim

AU - Hahn, Deirdre

AU - Coursey, David

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - This article examines how individual characteristics and choice of communication medium influence the acceptance of research proposals by institutional review boards. Lab experiments were used to assess subject decisions in simulated review board processes regarding four mock research proposals. Results indicate that participants were less likely to approve risky scientific research proposals than those with lower risk and fewer ethical issues, but still the evaluations varied. Females had less likelihood of approving risky scientific research with ethical concerns. When demographic characteristics were controlled, the visual presentation of proposals increased the odds that participants would approve high-risk scientific research. This study contributes to the review board reform debate by empirically examining how personal characteristics and communication medium influence board members' reviews of proposals.

AB - This article examines how individual characteristics and choice of communication medium influence the acceptance of research proposals by institutional review boards. Lab experiments were used to assess subject decisions in simulated review board processes regarding four mock research proposals. Results indicate that participants were less likely to approve risky scientific research proposals than those with lower risk and fewer ethical issues, but still the evaluations varied. Females had less likelihood of approving risky scientific research with ethical concerns. When demographic characteristics were controlled, the visual presentation of proposals increased the odds that participants would approve high-risk scientific research. This study contributes to the review board reform debate by empirically examining how personal characteristics and communication medium influence board members' reviews of proposals.

KW - communication medium

KW - decision-making

KW - institutional review boards

KW - institutionalized ethics

KW - risk

KW - scientific research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063354741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063354741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2753/PIN1099-9922140204

DO - 10.2753/PIN1099-9922140204

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 173

EP - 192

JO - Public Integrity

JF - Public Integrity

SN - 1099-9922

IS - 2

ER -