Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts

Marjorie A. Chan, Nancy W. Hinman, Sally L. Potter-Mcintyre, Keith E. Schubert, Richard J. Gillams, Stanley M. Awramik, Penelope J. Boston, Dina M. Bower, David J. Des Marais, Jack Farmer, Tony Z. Jia, Penelope L. King, Robert M. Hazen, Richard J. Léveillé, Dominic Papineau, Kaitlin R. Rempfert, Mónica Sánchez-Román, John R. Spear, Gordon Southam, Jennifer C. SternHenderson James Cleaves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with "abiosignatures" formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the "right" spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1075-1102
Number of pages28
JournalAstrobiology
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Exobiology
fossils
minerals
sedimentary rocks
permeates
enantiomers
instrumentation
chemical phenomena
Minerals
isotopes
physical phenomena
Chemical Phenomena
concretion
extraterrestrial life
geological feature
trace fossil
data management
mineral
Physical Phenomena
Planets

Keywords

  • Astrobiology
  • Biosignatures
  • Extraterrestrial life
  • Extremophile.
  • Taphonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Chan, M. A., Hinman, N. W., Potter-Mcintyre, S. L., Schubert, K. E., Gillams, R. J., Awramik, S. M., ... Cleaves, H. J. (2019). Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts. Astrobiology, 19(9), 1075-1102. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1903

Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts. / Chan, Marjorie A.; Hinman, Nancy W.; Potter-Mcintyre, Sally L.; Schubert, Keith E.; Gillams, Richard J.; Awramik, Stanley M.; Boston, Penelope J.; Bower, Dina M.; Des Marais, David J.; Farmer, Jack; Jia, Tony Z.; King, Penelope L.; Hazen, Robert M.; Léveillé, Richard J.; Papineau, Dominic; Rempfert, Kaitlin R.; Sánchez-Román, Mónica; Spear, John R.; Southam, Gordon; Stern, Jennifer C.; Cleaves, Henderson James.

In: Astrobiology, Vol. 19, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 1075-1102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chan, MA, Hinman, NW, Potter-Mcintyre, SL, Schubert, KE, Gillams, RJ, Awramik, SM, Boston, PJ, Bower, DM, Des Marais, DJ, Farmer, J, Jia, TZ, King, PL, Hazen, RM, Léveillé, RJ, Papineau, D, Rempfert, KR, Sánchez-Román, M, Spear, JR, Southam, G, Stern, JC & Cleaves, HJ 2019, 'Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts', Astrobiology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1075-1102. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1903
Chan MA, Hinman NW, Potter-Mcintyre SL, Schubert KE, Gillams RJ, Awramik SM et al. Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts. Astrobiology. 2019 Sep 1;19(9):1075-1102. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1903
Chan, Marjorie A. ; Hinman, Nancy W. ; Potter-Mcintyre, Sally L. ; Schubert, Keith E. ; Gillams, Richard J. ; Awramik, Stanley M. ; Boston, Penelope J. ; Bower, Dina M. ; Des Marais, David J. ; Farmer, Jack ; Jia, Tony Z. ; King, Penelope L. ; Hazen, Robert M. ; Léveillé, Richard J. ; Papineau, Dominic ; Rempfert, Kaitlin R. ; Sánchez-Román, Mónica ; Spear, John R. ; Southam, Gordon ; Stern, Jennifer C. ; Cleaves, Henderson James. / Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts. In: Astrobiology. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 9. pp. 1075-1102.
@article{6aa3b8621a464af08b3e0b47f5275c82,
title = "Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts",
abstract = "Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with {"}abiosignatures{"} formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the {"}right{"} spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.",
keywords = "Astrobiology, Biosignatures, Extraterrestrial life, Extremophile., Taphonomy",
author = "Chan, {Marjorie A.} and Hinman, {Nancy W.} and Potter-Mcintyre, {Sally L.} and Schubert, {Keith E.} and Gillams, {Richard J.} and Awramik, {Stanley M.} and Boston, {Penelope J.} and Bower, {Dina M.} and {Des Marais}, {David J.} and Jack Farmer and Jia, {Tony Z.} and King, {Penelope L.} and Hazen, {Robert M.} and L{\'e}veill{\'e}, {Richard J.} and Dominic Papineau and Rempfert, {Kaitlin R.} and M{\'o}nica S{\'a}nchez-Rom{\'a}n and Spear, {John R.} and Gordon Southam and Stern, {Jennifer C.} and Cleaves, {Henderson James}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/ast.2018.1903",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1075--1102",
journal = "Astrobiology",
issn = "1531-1074",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts

AU - Chan, Marjorie A.

AU - Hinman, Nancy W.

AU - Potter-Mcintyre, Sally L.

AU - Schubert, Keith E.

AU - Gillams, Richard J.

AU - Awramik, Stanley M.

AU - Boston, Penelope J.

AU - Bower, Dina M.

AU - Des Marais, David J.

AU - Farmer, Jack

AU - Jia, Tony Z.

AU - King, Penelope L.

AU - Hazen, Robert M.

AU - Léveillé, Richard J.

AU - Papineau, Dominic

AU - Rempfert, Kaitlin R.

AU - Sánchez-Román, Mónica

AU - Spear, John R.

AU - Southam, Gordon

AU - Stern, Jennifer C.

AU - Cleaves, Henderson James

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with "abiosignatures" formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the "right" spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.

AB - Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with "abiosignatures" formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the "right" spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.

KW - Astrobiology

KW - Biosignatures

KW - Extraterrestrial life

KW - Extremophile.

KW - Taphonomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066503725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066503725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/ast.2018.1903

DO - 10.1089/ast.2018.1903

M3 - Article

C2 - 31335163

AN - SCOPUS:85066503725

VL - 19

SP - 1075

EP - 1102

JO - Astrobiology

JF - Astrobiology

SN - 1531-1074

IS - 9

ER -