Dealing with diversity: Racial/ethnic context and social policy change

Caroline J. Tolbert, Rodney Hero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose and provide an explanation of voting behavior that argues it is a convergence of a social context (high racial/ethnic diversity) and institutional context (frequent, use of direct democracy) that is associated with the adoption of public policies targeted at minority groups. We examine this argument in the state of California, the most racially diverse state in the nation, and one that has historically high usage of ballot initiatives. We analyze white voting for four social policy ballot initiatives that directly targeted minority groups over a twelve-year period. Using King's method of ecological inference (1997), the study demonstrates that white support for the initiatives varied systematically by racial and ethnic environments across policy issues and over time. The white votes was consistently higher in "bifurcated" environments, as might be expected given Key's (1949) research on a racial threat; but is was also notably higher in "homogeneous" contexts, even after accounting for economic conditions and partisanship. Social heterogeneity, particularly white ethnic diversity, is associated with lower support for the ballot propositions. The research expands the social diversity interpretation (Hero 1998) by taking into consideration institutional context, contributes to our understanding of minorities and direct democracy, and raises broader questions about procedural democracy and the appropriate scope of conflict for direct democracy elections in the U.S.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)571-604
Number of pages34
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

direct democracy
minority
voting behavior
voting
voter
public policy
Group
election
threat
democracy
interpretation
economics
Social Policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Dealing with diversity : Racial/ethnic context and social policy change. / Tolbert, Caroline J.; Hero, Rodney.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 571-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7c500caecf74da2b3d916faf8d2c670,
title = "Dealing with diversity: Racial/ethnic context and social policy change",
abstract = "We propose and provide an explanation of voting behavior that argues it is a convergence of a social context (high racial/ethnic diversity) and institutional context (frequent, use of direct democracy) that is associated with the adoption of public policies targeted at minority groups. We examine this argument in the state of California, the most racially diverse state in the nation, and one that has historically high usage of ballot initiatives. We analyze white voting for four social policy ballot initiatives that directly targeted minority groups over a twelve-year period. Using King's method of ecological inference (1997), the study demonstrates that white support for the initiatives varied systematically by racial and ethnic environments across policy issues and over time. The white votes was consistently higher in {"}bifurcated{"} environments, as might be expected given Key's (1949) research on a racial threat; but is was also notably higher in {"}homogeneous{"} contexts, even after accounting for economic conditions and partisanship. Social heterogeneity, particularly white ethnic diversity, is associated with lower support for the ballot propositions. The research expands the social diversity interpretation (Hero 1998) by taking into consideration institutional context, contributes to our understanding of minorities and direct democracy, and raises broader questions about procedural democracy and the appropriate scope of conflict for direct democracy elections in the U.S.",
author = "Tolbert, {Caroline J.} and Rodney Hero",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/106591290105400305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "571--604",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with diversity

T2 - Racial/ethnic context and social policy change

AU - Tolbert, Caroline J.

AU - Hero, Rodney

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - We propose and provide an explanation of voting behavior that argues it is a convergence of a social context (high racial/ethnic diversity) and institutional context (frequent, use of direct democracy) that is associated with the adoption of public policies targeted at minority groups. We examine this argument in the state of California, the most racially diverse state in the nation, and one that has historically high usage of ballot initiatives. We analyze white voting for four social policy ballot initiatives that directly targeted minority groups over a twelve-year period. Using King's method of ecological inference (1997), the study demonstrates that white support for the initiatives varied systematically by racial and ethnic environments across policy issues and over time. The white votes was consistently higher in "bifurcated" environments, as might be expected given Key's (1949) research on a racial threat; but is was also notably higher in "homogeneous" contexts, even after accounting for economic conditions and partisanship. Social heterogeneity, particularly white ethnic diversity, is associated with lower support for the ballot propositions. The research expands the social diversity interpretation (Hero 1998) by taking into consideration institutional context, contributes to our understanding of minorities and direct democracy, and raises broader questions about procedural democracy and the appropriate scope of conflict for direct democracy elections in the U.S.

AB - We propose and provide an explanation of voting behavior that argues it is a convergence of a social context (high racial/ethnic diversity) and institutional context (frequent, use of direct democracy) that is associated with the adoption of public policies targeted at minority groups. We examine this argument in the state of California, the most racially diverse state in the nation, and one that has historically high usage of ballot initiatives. We analyze white voting for four social policy ballot initiatives that directly targeted minority groups over a twelve-year period. Using King's method of ecological inference (1997), the study demonstrates that white support for the initiatives varied systematically by racial and ethnic environments across policy issues and over time. The white votes was consistently higher in "bifurcated" environments, as might be expected given Key's (1949) research on a racial threat; but is was also notably higher in "homogeneous" contexts, even after accounting for economic conditions and partisanship. Social heterogeneity, particularly white ethnic diversity, is associated with lower support for the ballot propositions. The research expands the social diversity interpretation (Hero 1998) by taking into consideration institutional context, contributes to our understanding of minorities and direct democracy, and raises broader questions about procedural democracy and the appropriate scope of conflict for direct democracy elections in the U.S.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035604529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035604529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/106591290105400305

DO - 10.1177/106591290105400305

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035604529

VL - 54

SP - 571

EP - 604

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 3

ER -