Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems

Elliot P. Douglas, Nathan McNeill, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, David J. Therriault

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty materials engineering students solved four problems which varied in level of complexity as well as closed- and open-endedness. Students scored lower on more complex problems, but scored higher on open-ended problems. However, students who solved the problems in a think aloud setting expressed greater discomfort with the open-ended problems because of the lack of constraints provided by these problems. Students dealt with the ambiguity of the open-ended problems in a variety of ways. Some students provided ambiguous answers while others added their own constraints to the problems. The manner in which problems were scored may have contributed to the unexpected finding that students scored higher on open-ended problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResearch in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011
Pages850-858
Number of pages9
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, REES 2011 - Madrid, Spain
Duration: Oct 4 2011Oct 7 2011

Other

Other2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, REES 2011
CountrySpain
CityMadrid
Period10/4/1110/7/11

Fingerprint

Students
engineering
student
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Douglas, E. P., McNeill, N., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Therriault, D. J. (2011). Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems. In Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011 (pp. 850-858)

Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems. / Douglas, Elliot P.; McNeill, Nathan; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Therriault, David J.

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011. 2011. p. 850-858.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Douglas, EP, McNeill, N, Koro-Ljungberg, M & Therriault, DJ 2011, Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems. in Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011. pp. 850-858, 2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, REES 2011, Madrid, Spain, 10/4/11.
Douglas EP, McNeill N, Koro-Ljungberg M, Therriault DJ. Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems. In Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011. 2011. p. 850-858
Douglas, Elliot P. ; McNeill, Nathan ; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka ; Therriault, David J. / Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems. Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011. 2011. pp. 850-858
@inproceedings{8644e42a48364798a31b5a6db52efe66,
title = "Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems",
abstract = "Thirty materials engineering students solved four problems which varied in level of complexity as well as closed- and open-endedness. Students scored lower on more complex problems, but scored higher on open-ended problems. However, students who solved the problems in a think aloud setting expressed greater discomfort with the open-ended problems because of the lack of constraints provided by these problems. Students dealt with the ambiguity of the open-ended problems in a variety of ways. Some students provided ambiguous answers while others added their own constraints to the problems. The manner in which problems were scored may have contributed to the unexpected finding that students scored higher on open-ended problems.",
author = "Douglas, {Elliot P.} and Nathan McNeill and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Therriault, {David J.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781627481847",
pages = "850--858",
booktitle = "Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems

AU - Douglas, Elliot P.

AU - McNeill, Nathan

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Therriault, David J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Thirty materials engineering students solved four problems which varied in level of complexity as well as closed- and open-endedness. Students scored lower on more complex problems, but scored higher on open-ended problems. However, students who solved the problems in a think aloud setting expressed greater discomfort with the open-ended problems because of the lack of constraints provided by these problems. Students dealt with the ambiguity of the open-ended problems in a variety of ways. Some students provided ambiguous answers while others added their own constraints to the problems. The manner in which problems were scored may have contributed to the unexpected finding that students scored higher on open-ended problems.

AB - Thirty materials engineering students solved four problems which varied in level of complexity as well as closed- and open-endedness. Students scored lower on more complex problems, but scored higher on open-ended problems. However, students who solved the problems in a think aloud setting expressed greater discomfort with the open-ended problems because of the lack of constraints provided by these problems. Students dealt with the ambiguity of the open-ended problems in a variety of ways. Some students provided ambiguous answers while others added their own constraints to the problems. The manner in which problems were scored may have contributed to the unexpected finding that students scored higher on open-ended problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883095864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883095864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84883095864

SN - 9781627481847

SP - 850

EP - 858

BT - Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011

ER -