Dating the cooling of exhumed central uplifts of impact structures by the (U-Th)/He method

A case study at Manicouagan

Marc B. Biren, Matthijs Van Soest, Jo Anne Wartho, John G. Spray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forty titanite grain fragments from 9 central uplift samples of metamorphosed anorthosite from the Manicouagan impact structure were dated by the (U-Th)/He technique. A (U-Th)/He central age of 207.1 ± 6.4. Ma (2 standard error (SE), n = 40) has been determined. With 4 outlier ages removed the central age is refined to 208.9 ± 5.1. Ma (2 SE). Both of these ages are within error of the previously determined U-Pb zircon age of 214 ± 1. Ma (2. σ) derived from the impact melt. Manicouagan's central uplift formed due to rapid elevation from ~. 7-10. km depth as part of the modification stage of the impact process, which has facilitated the dating of its emplacement due to resulting rapid exhumation and cooling and closure of the (U-Th)/He system in titanite. Correlation with the previous U-Pb zircon 214 ± 1. Ma impact melt crystallization age indicates that the (U-Th)/He titanite dating technique offers a new approach to dating complex impact structures in the absence of viable melt sheets, or other melt products. The youngest ca. 195. Ma (U-Th)/He dates preserved in some titanite fragments are synchronous with Early Jurassic, rift-induced lithospheric thinning and associated igneous activity that defines the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). The (U-Th)/He titanite data from Manicouagan indicate that the influence of this regional event may extend west of the previously proposed limit of CAMP activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-71
Number of pages16
JournalChemical Geology
Volume377
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 4 2014

Fingerprint

impact structure
titanite
uplift
Cooling
cooling
melt
Crystallization
zircon
anorthosite
outlier
exhumation
thinning
method
dating
emplacement
crystallization
Jurassic

Keywords

  • Central atlantic magmatic province
  • Central uplift
  • Helium diffusion
  • Radiation damage
  • Shock metamorphism
  • Thermochronology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Dating the cooling of exhumed central uplifts of impact structures by the (U-Th)/He method : A case study at Manicouagan. / Biren, Marc B.; Van Soest, Matthijs; Wartho, Jo Anne; Spray, John G.

In: Chemical Geology, Vol. 377, 04.06.2014, p. 56-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Biren, Marc B. ; Van Soest, Matthijs ; Wartho, Jo Anne ; Spray, John G. / Dating the cooling of exhumed central uplifts of impact structures by the (U-Th)/He method : A case study at Manicouagan. In: Chemical Geology. 2014 ; Vol. 377. pp. 56-71.
@article{7791f89e20594c9ebcb7fdc001ed6d38,
title = "Dating the cooling of exhumed central uplifts of impact structures by the (U-Th)/He method: A case study at Manicouagan",
abstract = "Forty titanite grain fragments from 9 central uplift samples of metamorphosed anorthosite from the Manicouagan impact structure were dated by the (U-Th)/He technique. A (U-Th)/He central age of 207.1 ± 6.4. Ma (2 standard error (SE), n = 40) has been determined. With 4 outlier ages removed the central age is refined to 208.9 ± 5.1. Ma (2 SE). Both of these ages are within error of the previously determined U-Pb zircon age of 214 ± 1. Ma (2. σ) derived from the impact melt. Manicouagan's central uplift formed due to rapid elevation from ~. 7-10. km depth as part of the modification stage of the impact process, which has facilitated the dating of its emplacement due to resulting rapid exhumation and cooling and closure of the (U-Th)/He system in titanite. Correlation with the previous U-Pb zircon 214 ± 1. Ma impact melt crystallization age indicates that the (U-Th)/He titanite dating technique offers a new approach to dating complex impact structures in the absence of viable melt sheets, or other melt products. The youngest ca. 195. Ma (U-Th)/He dates preserved in some titanite fragments are synchronous with Early Jurassic, rift-induced lithospheric thinning and associated igneous activity that defines the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). The (U-Th)/He titanite data from Manicouagan indicate that the influence of this regional event may extend west of the previously proposed limit of CAMP activity.",
keywords = "Central atlantic magmatic province, Central uplift, Helium diffusion, Radiation damage, Shock metamorphism, Thermochronology",
author = "Biren, {Marc B.} and {Van Soest}, Matthijs and Wartho, {Jo Anne} and Spray, {John G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "377",
pages = "56--71",
journal = "Chemical Geology",
issn = "0009-2541",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dating the cooling of exhumed central uplifts of impact structures by the (U-Th)/He method

T2 - A case study at Manicouagan

AU - Biren, Marc B.

AU - Van Soest, Matthijs

AU - Wartho, Jo Anne

AU - Spray, John G.

PY - 2014/6/4

Y1 - 2014/6/4

N2 - Forty titanite grain fragments from 9 central uplift samples of metamorphosed anorthosite from the Manicouagan impact structure were dated by the (U-Th)/He technique. A (U-Th)/He central age of 207.1 ± 6.4. Ma (2 standard error (SE), n = 40) has been determined. With 4 outlier ages removed the central age is refined to 208.9 ± 5.1. Ma (2 SE). Both of these ages are within error of the previously determined U-Pb zircon age of 214 ± 1. Ma (2. σ) derived from the impact melt. Manicouagan's central uplift formed due to rapid elevation from ~. 7-10. km depth as part of the modification stage of the impact process, which has facilitated the dating of its emplacement due to resulting rapid exhumation and cooling and closure of the (U-Th)/He system in titanite. Correlation with the previous U-Pb zircon 214 ± 1. Ma impact melt crystallization age indicates that the (U-Th)/He titanite dating technique offers a new approach to dating complex impact structures in the absence of viable melt sheets, or other melt products. The youngest ca. 195. Ma (U-Th)/He dates preserved in some titanite fragments are synchronous with Early Jurassic, rift-induced lithospheric thinning and associated igneous activity that defines the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). The (U-Th)/He titanite data from Manicouagan indicate that the influence of this regional event may extend west of the previously proposed limit of CAMP activity.

AB - Forty titanite grain fragments from 9 central uplift samples of metamorphosed anorthosite from the Manicouagan impact structure were dated by the (U-Th)/He technique. A (U-Th)/He central age of 207.1 ± 6.4. Ma (2 standard error (SE), n = 40) has been determined. With 4 outlier ages removed the central age is refined to 208.9 ± 5.1. Ma (2 SE). Both of these ages are within error of the previously determined U-Pb zircon age of 214 ± 1. Ma (2. σ) derived from the impact melt. Manicouagan's central uplift formed due to rapid elevation from ~. 7-10. km depth as part of the modification stage of the impact process, which has facilitated the dating of its emplacement due to resulting rapid exhumation and cooling and closure of the (U-Th)/He system in titanite. Correlation with the previous U-Pb zircon 214 ± 1. Ma impact melt crystallization age indicates that the (U-Th)/He titanite dating technique offers a new approach to dating complex impact structures in the absence of viable melt sheets, or other melt products. The youngest ca. 195. Ma (U-Th)/He dates preserved in some titanite fragments are synchronous with Early Jurassic, rift-induced lithospheric thinning and associated igneous activity that defines the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). The (U-Th)/He titanite data from Manicouagan indicate that the influence of this regional event may extend west of the previously proposed limit of CAMP activity.

KW - Central atlantic magmatic province

KW - Central uplift

KW - Helium diffusion

KW - Radiation damage

KW - Shock metamorphism

KW - Thermochronology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899698892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899698892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.013

M3 - Article

VL - 377

SP - 56

EP - 71

JO - Chemical Geology

JF - Chemical Geology

SN - 0009-2541

ER -