Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization

Brian M. Patterson, Nikolaus L. Cordes, Kevin Henderson, Xianghui Xiao, Nikhilesh Chawla

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Since its development in the 1970s (Hounsfield, Br J Radiol 46(552):1016–1022, 1973) [1], X-ray tomography has been used to study the three dimensional (3D) structure of nearly every type of material of interest to science, both in the laboratory (Elliott and Dover, J Microsc 126(2):211–213, 1982) [2] and at synchrotron facilities (Thompson et al., Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 222(1):319–323, 1984) [3]. The ability to nondestructively image internal structures is useful in the medical community for patient diagnosis. For this same reason, it is critical for understanding material structural morphology. X-ray tomography of static materials can generate a true 3D structure to map out content and distribution within materials including voids, cracks, inclusions, microstructure, and interfacial quality. This technology is even more useful when applying a time component and studying the changes in materials as they are subjected to non-equilibrium stimulations. For example, testing mechanical properties (e.g., compressive or tensile loading), thermal properties (e.g., melting or solidification), corrosion, or electrostatic responses, while simultaneously imaging the material in situ, can replicate real world conditions leading to an increase in the fundamental understanding of how materials react to these stimuli. Mechanical buckling in foams, migration of cracks in composite materials, progression of a solidification front during metal solidification, and the formation of sub-surface corrosion pits are just a few of the many applications of this technology. This chapter will outline the challenges of taking a series of radiographs while simultaneously stressing a material, and processing it to answer questions about material properties. The path is complex, highly user interactive, and the resulting quality of the processing at each step can greatly affect the accuracy and usefulness of the derived information. Understanding the current state-of-the-art is critical to informing the audience of what capabilities are available for materials studies, what the challenges are in processing these large data sets, and which developments can guide future experiments. For example, one particular challenge in this type of measurement is the need for a carefully designed experiment so that the requirements of 3D imaging are also met. Additionally, the rapid collection of many terabytes of data in just a few days leads to the required development of automated reconstruction, filtering, segmentation, visualization, and animation techniques. Finally, taking these qualitative images and acquiring quantitative metrics (e.g., morphological statistics), converting the high quality 3D images to meshes suitable for modeling, and coordinating the images to secondary measures (e.g., temperature, force response) has proven to be a significant challenge when a materials scientist ‘simply’ needs an understanding of how material processing affects its response to stimuli. This chapter will outline the types of in situ experiments and the large data challenges in extracting materials properties information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSpringer Series in Materials Science
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages129-165
Number of pages37
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Publication series

NameSpringer Series in Materials Science
Volume280
ISSN (Print)0933-033X

Fingerprint

Tomography
X rays
Solidification
Processing
Materials properties
Corrosion
Cracks
Imaging techniques
Experiments
Animation
Synchrotrons
Buckling
Foams
Electrostatics
Melting
Thermodynamic properties
Visualization
Metals
Statistics
Mechanical properties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Patterson, B. M., Cordes, N. L., Henderson, K., Xiao, X., & Chawla, N. (2018). Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization. In Springer Series in Materials Science (pp. 129-165). (Springer Series in Materials Science; Vol. 280). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99465-9_6

Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization. / Patterson, Brian M.; Cordes, Nikolaus L.; Henderson, Kevin; Xiao, Xianghui; Chawla, Nikhilesh.

Springer Series in Materials Science. Springer Verlag, 2018. p. 129-165 (Springer Series in Materials Science; Vol. 280).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Patterson, BM, Cordes, NL, Henderson, K, Xiao, X & Chawla, N 2018, Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization. in Springer Series in Materials Science. Springer Series in Materials Science, vol. 280, Springer Verlag, pp. 129-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99465-9_6
Patterson BM, Cordes NL, Henderson K, Xiao X, Chawla N. Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization. In Springer Series in Materials Science. Springer Verlag. 2018. p. 129-165. (Springer Series in Materials Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99465-9_6
Patterson, Brian M. ; Cordes, Nikolaus L. ; Henderson, Kevin ; Xiao, Xianghui ; Chawla, Nikhilesh. / Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization. Springer Series in Materials Science. Springer Verlag, 2018. pp. 129-165 (Springer Series in Materials Science).
@inbook{b0367d2e874b4f72888892d3fcb2c4ea,
title = "Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization",
abstract = "Since its development in the 1970s (Hounsfield, Br J Radiol 46(552):1016–1022, 1973) [1], X-ray tomography has been used to study the three dimensional (3D) structure of nearly every type of material of interest to science, both in the laboratory (Elliott and Dover, J Microsc 126(2):211–213, 1982) [2] and at synchrotron facilities (Thompson et al., Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 222(1):319–323, 1984) [3]. The ability to nondestructively image internal structures is useful in the medical community for patient diagnosis. For this same reason, it is critical for understanding material structural morphology. X-ray tomography of static materials can generate a true 3D structure to map out content and distribution within materials including voids, cracks, inclusions, microstructure, and interfacial quality. This technology is even more useful when applying a time component and studying the changes in materials as they are subjected to non-equilibrium stimulations. For example, testing mechanical properties (e.g., compressive or tensile loading), thermal properties (e.g., melting or solidification), corrosion, or electrostatic responses, while simultaneously imaging the material in situ, can replicate real world conditions leading to an increase in the fundamental understanding of how materials react to these stimuli. Mechanical buckling in foams, migration of cracks in composite materials, progression of a solidification front during metal solidification, and the formation of sub-surface corrosion pits are just a few of the many applications of this technology. This chapter will outline the challenges of taking a series of radiographs while simultaneously stressing a material, and processing it to answer questions about material properties. The path is complex, highly user interactive, and the resulting quality of the processing at each step can greatly affect the accuracy and usefulness of the derived information. Understanding the current state-of-the-art is critical to informing the audience of what capabilities are available for materials studies, what the challenges are in processing these large data sets, and which developments can guide future experiments. For example, one particular challenge in this type of measurement is the need for a carefully designed experiment so that the requirements of 3D imaging are also met. Additionally, the rapid collection of many terabytes of data in just a few days leads to the required development of automated reconstruction, filtering, segmentation, visualization, and animation techniques. Finally, taking these qualitative images and acquiring quantitative metrics (e.g., morphological statistics), converting the high quality 3D images to meshes suitable for modeling, and coordinating the images to secondary measures (e.g., temperature, force response) has proven to be a significant challenge when a materials scientist ‘simply’ needs an understanding of how material processing affects its response to stimuli. This chapter will outline the types of in situ experiments and the large data challenges in extracting materials properties information.",
author = "Patterson, {Brian M.} and Cordes, {Nikolaus L.} and Kevin Henderson and Xianghui Xiao and Nikhilesh Chawla",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-99465-9_6",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Springer Series in Materials Science",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "129--165",
booktitle = "Springer Series in Materials Science",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Data challenges of in situ X-ray tomography for materials discovery and characterization

AU - Patterson, Brian M.

AU - Cordes, Nikolaus L.

AU - Henderson, Kevin

AU - Xiao, Xianghui

AU - Chawla, Nikhilesh

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Since its development in the 1970s (Hounsfield, Br J Radiol 46(552):1016–1022, 1973) [1], X-ray tomography has been used to study the three dimensional (3D) structure of nearly every type of material of interest to science, both in the laboratory (Elliott and Dover, J Microsc 126(2):211–213, 1982) [2] and at synchrotron facilities (Thompson et al., Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 222(1):319–323, 1984) [3]. The ability to nondestructively image internal structures is useful in the medical community for patient diagnosis. For this same reason, it is critical for understanding material structural morphology. X-ray tomography of static materials can generate a true 3D structure to map out content and distribution within materials including voids, cracks, inclusions, microstructure, and interfacial quality. This technology is even more useful when applying a time component and studying the changes in materials as they are subjected to non-equilibrium stimulations. For example, testing mechanical properties (e.g., compressive or tensile loading), thermal properties (e.g., melting or solidification), corrosion, or electrostatic responses, while simultaneously imaging the material in situ, can replicate real world conditions leading to an increase in the fundamental understanding of how materials react to these stimuli. Mechanical buckling in foams, migration of cracks in composite materials, progression of a solidification front during metal solidification, and the formation of sub-surface corrosion pits are just a few of the many applications of this technology. This chapter will outline the challenges of taking a series of radiographs while simultaneously stressing a material, and processing it to answer questions about material properties. The path is complex, highly user interactive, and the resulting quality of the processing at each step can greatly affect the accuracy and usefulness of the derived information. Understanding the current state-of-the-art is critical to informing the audience of what capabilities are available for materials studies, what the challenges are in processing these large data sets, and which developments can guide future experiments. For example, one particular challenge in this type of measurement is the need for a carefully designed experiment so that the requirements of 3D imaging are also met. Additionally, the rapid collection of many terabytes of data in just a few days leads to the required development of automated reconstruction, filtering, segmentation, visualization, and animation techniques. Finally, taking these qualitative images and acquiring quantitative metrics (e.g., morphological statistics), converting the high quality 3D images to meshes suitable for modeling, and coordinating the images to secondary measures (e.g., temperature, force response) has proven to be a significant challenge when a materials scientist ‘simply’ needs an understanding of how material processing affects its response to stimuli. This chapter will outline the types of in situ experiments and the large data challenges in extracting materials properties information.

AB - Since its development in the 1970s (Hounsfield, Br J Radiol 46(552):1016–1022, 1973) [1], X-ray tomography has been used to study the three dimensional (3D) structure of nearly every type of material of interest to science, both in the laboratory (Elliott and Dover, J Microsc 126(2):211–213, 1982) [2] and at synchrotron facilities (Thompson et al., Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 222(1):319–323, 1984) [3]. The ability to nondestructively image internal structures is useful in the medical community for patient diagnosis. For this same reason, it is critical for understanding material structural morphology. X-ray tomography of static materials can generate a true 3D structure to map out content and distribution within materials including voids, cracks, inclusions, microstructure, and interfacial quality. This technology is even more useful when applying a time component and studying the changes in materials as they are subjected to non-equilibrium stimulations. For example, testing mechanical properties (e.g., compressive or tensile loading), thermal properties (e.g., melting or solidification), corrosion, or electrostatic responses, while simultaneously imaging the material in situ, can replicate real world conditions leading to an increase in the fundamental understanding of how materials react to these stimuli. Mechanical buckling in foams, migration of cracks in composite materials, progression of a solidification front during metal solidification, and the formation of sub-surface corrosion pits are just a few of the many applications of this technology. This chapter will outline the challenges of taking a series of radiographs while simultaneously stressing a material, and processing it to answer questions about material properties. The path is complex, highly user interactive, and the resulting quality of the processing at each step can greatly affect the accuracy and usefulness of the derived information. Understanding the current state-of-the-art is critical to informing the audience of what capabilities are available for materials studies, what the challenges are in processing these large data sets, and which developments can guide future experiments. For example, one particular challenge in this type of measurement is the need for a carefully designed experiment so that the requirements of 3D imaging are also met. Additionally, the rapid collection of many terabytes of data in just a few days leads to the required development of automated reconstruction, filtering, segmentation, visualization, and animation techniques. Finally, taking these qualitative images and acquiring quantitative metrics (e.g., morphological statistics), converting the high quality 3D images to meshes suitable for modeling, and coordinating the images to secondary measures (e.g., temperature, force response) has proven to be a significant challenge when a materials scientist ‘simply’ needs an understanding of how material processing affects its response to stimuli. This chapter will outline the types of in situ experiments and the large data challenges in extracting materials properties information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053842127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053842127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-99465-9_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-99465-9_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85053842127

T3 - Springer Series in Materials Science

SP - 129

EP - 165

BT - Springer Series in Materials Science

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -